Midwifery directions: The Australian Maternity Services Review

References

• ACM (2008) National midwifery guidelines for consultation and referral (2nd ed). available at: http://www.midwives.org.au/Portals/8/Documents/standards%20&%20guidelines/Consultation%20Referral%20Guidelines%20Sept%202008.pdf [Date of access: 20 May 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (1999) Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems Sage: London.
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, L. (1995) ‘The education of midwives in Australia: Current trends and future directions’ in Murphy-Black, T. (ed.) Issues in midwifery Churchill-Livingstone: London.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (2008) Improving maternity services in Australia: A discussion paper from the Australian Government. Department of Health and Ageing: Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (2009) Report of the maternity services review. Department of Health and Ageing: Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (2010a) Community Affairs Legislation Committee Health Legislation Amendment (Midwives and Nurse Practitioners) Bill 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (2010b) Midwife Professional Indemnity (Commonwealth Contribution) Scheme Bill 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia (2010c) Midwife Professional Indemnity (Run-off Cover Support Payment) Bill 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd, R.; and Davis, E. (1997) ‘Intuition as authoritative knowledge in midwifery and home birth’ in Davis-Floyd, R. and Sargent, C. (eds) Childbirth and authoritative knowledge: Cross-cultural perspectives University of California Press: Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Ageing (2010a) Maternity Services Reforms: More choice for women – indemnity insurance for midwives available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/maternityservicesreview [Date of access: 20 April 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Ageing (2010b) Maternity Services reform: More choice for women – MBS and PBS access page available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/maternityservicesreview [Date of access: 20 April 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Ageing (2010c) Midwife Reform Legislation: Fact Sheet available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/maternityservicesreview [Date of access: 20 April 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Ageing (2010d) Maternity Services Advisory Group available at http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/maternityservicesreview [Date of access: 20 April 2010].
   Google Scholar
• DeVries, R.; and Barosso, R. (1997) ‘Midwives among the machines: Recreating midwifery in the late twentieth century’ in Marland, H. and Rafferty, A. (eds) Midwives, society and childbirth: Debates and controversies in the modern period Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Donnison, J. (1988) Midwives and medical men: A history of the struggle for the control of childbirth Historical Publications: London.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, N. (2000) ‘Women planning homebirths: Their own views on their relationships with midwives’ in Kirkham, M. (ed.) The midwife-mother relationship Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B.; and English, D. (1973) Witches, midwives and nurses: A history of women healers The Feminist Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Flint, C. (1988) ‘On the brink: Midwifery in Britain’ in Kitzinger, S. (ed.) The midwife challenge Pandora Press: London.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980/1976) ‘Two Lectures’ in Gordon, C. (ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 The Harvester Press: Brighton, pp. 78–108.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984a) ‘Truth and power’ in Rabinow, P. (ed.) The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought Penguin Books: Camberwell.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984b) ‘On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress’ in Rabinow, P. (ed.) The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought Penguin Books: Camberwell.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2000) [1981] ‘So is it important to think?’ in Faubion, J. (ed.) Power: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 Vol 3, New Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008) [1976] The history of sexuality: Volume 1 Penguin Books: Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Foureur, M. (2008) ‘Creating birth space to enable undisturbed birth’ in Fahy, K., Foureur, M. and Hastie, C. (eds) Birth territory and midwifery guardianship: Theory for practice, education and research Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier: Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, J.; and Vernon, B. (2007) ‘Midwifery in Australia: Emerging from the shadows’ in Reid, L. (ed.) Midwifery: Freedom to practise?: An international exploration of midwifery practice Churchill Livingstone Elsevier: Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Glezerman, M. (2006) ‘Five years to the term breech trial: The rise and fall of a randomized Controlled trial’ American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 194(1):20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia, Department of Health (DoH) (2005a) Policy – First stage labour in water. Department of Health: Adelaide. available at http://www.health.sa.gov.au/Default.aspx?tabid = 62.
   Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia, Department of Health (DoH) (2005b) Policy – Birth in water. Department of Health: Adelaide. available at http://www.health.sa.gov.au/Default.aspx?tabid=62.
   Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia, Department of Health (DoH) (2007) Policy for Planned Birth at Home in South Australia. Department of Health: Adelaide. available at http://www.health.sa.gov.au/Default.aspx?tabid=62.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, M.; Hannah, W.; Hewson, S.; Hodnett, E.; Saigal, S.; and Willan A. for the Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group (2000) ‘Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial’ The Lancet 356:1375–1383.
   Google Scholar
• Keirse, M. (1982) ‘Interaction between primary and secondary antenatal care, with particular reference to the Netherlands’ in Enkin, M. and Chalmers, I. (eds) Effectiveness and satisfaction in antenatal care William Heineman: London.
   Google Scholar
• Keirse, M. (2002) ‘Evidence-based childbirth only for breech babies?’ Birth 29(1):55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Keirse, M.; and Andrews, C. (2006) ‘Development of statewide policies for alternative birth options: The water birth option’ Birth Issues 15(1):5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkham, M. (ed.) (2000) ‘How can we relate?’ in The midwife-mother relationship Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kotaska, A. (2004) ‘Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: Case study of vaginal breech delivery’ British Medical Journal 329:1039–1042.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (2006) ‘The plasticity of professional boundaries: A case study of collaborative care in maternity services’ Health Sociology Review 15(4):341–353.
   Google Scholar
• Leap, N. (2000) ‘The less we do, the more we give’ in Kirkham, M. (ed.) The midwife-mother relationship Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lepori, B.; Foureur, M.; and Hastie, C. (2008) ‘Mindbodyspirit architecture: Creating birth space’ in Fahy, K., Foureur, M. and Hastie, C. (eds) Birth territory and midwifery guardianship: Theory for practice, education and research Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier: Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• MacColl, M. (2009) The birth wars University of Queensland Press: St Lucia, QLD.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. (2004) ‘Tradition as a political symbol in the new midwifery in Canada’ in Bourgeoult, I., Benoit, C.; and Davis-Floyd, R. (eds) Reconceiving midwifery McGill-Queen’s University Press: London.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005) On the political Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C.; and Laclau, E. (2001) Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical and democratic politics (2nd edn) Verso Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy-Lawless, J. (1998) Reading birth and death: A history of obstetric thinking Cork University Press: Cork.
   Google Scholar
• Myers-Cieko, J. (1988) ‘Direct-entry midwifery in the USA’ in Kitzinger, S. (ed.) The Midwife challenge Pandora Press: London.
   Google Scholar
• Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia and Department of Health and Ageing (2010) Guidelines and assessment framework for the recognition and endorsement of eligible midwives Draft #4.0.
   Google Scholar
• Odent, M. (1986) Birth reborn Fontana: London.
   Google Scholar
• Odent, M. (1999) The scientification of love Free Association Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• Odent, M. (2004) The caesarean Free Association Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, S. (1997) ‘Midwifery and medicine: Gendered knowledge in the practice of delivery’ in Marland, H. and Rafferty, A. (eds) Midwives, society and childbirth: Debates and controversies in the modern period Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1994) ‘Medicine, history and the present’ in Jones, C. and Porter, R. (eds) Reassessing Foucault: Power, medicine and the body Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, J. (2003) ‘The midwife in the ‘risk’ society’ New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 28:4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S.; Sullivan, E.; Wang, Y.; Black, D.; and Tracy, M. (2007) ‘Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: A population-based study’ Women and Birth 20(2):41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Turkel, K. (1995) Women, power and childbirth: A case study of a free-standing birth center Bergin and Garvey: Westport, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (2004) ‘Outcomes of free-standing, midwife-led birth centers: A structured review’ Birth 31(3):222–229.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (2007) Evidence-based care for normal labour and birth: A guide for midwives Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, R. (2000) ‘Poor relations: The paucity of the professional paradigm’ in Kirkham, M. (ed.) The midwife-mother relationship Palgrave Macmillan: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (1997) ‘The controlling power of childbirth in Britain’ in Marland, H. and Rafferty, A. (eds) Midwives, society and childbirth: Debates and controversies in the modern period Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, E. (1989) Medical dominance (2nd edn) Allen and Unwin: Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, E. ed. (2006) ‘Medical dominance revisited’ Health Sociology Review 15(5):421–534.
   Google Scholar