The last frontier? Autonomy, uncertainty and standardisation in general practice

References

• Abbott, A. (1995) ‘Things of boundaries’ Social Research 62(4):857–882.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C.E.; and Gilbody, S. (2001) ‘Nobody ever expects the Spanish Inquisition’ (Python, 1991) Psychiatric Bulletin 25(8):291–292.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, T.F.; and Mooney, G. (1990) The challenges of medical practice variations Palgrave Macmillan: London.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. (2002) ‘Clinical autonomy, individual and collective: the problem of changing doctors’ behaviour’ Social Science and Medicine 55(10):1771–1777.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (1984) ‘Training for certainty’ Social Science and Medicine 19:949–956.
   Google Scholar
• Balint, M. (1970) The doctor, his patient and the illness Tavistock: London.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M.; Horstman, K.; Plass, S.; and Heusden, M.V. (2000) ‘Guidelines, professionals and the production of objectivity: Standardisation and the professionalism of insurance medicine’ Sociology of Health and Illness 22(6):765–791.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, B.; Glenton, C.; and Pope, C. (2007) ‘Thou shalt versus thou shalt not. A qualitative meta-synthesis of GPs’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines’ British Journal of General Practice 57(545):971–978.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, B.; and Norheim, O.F. (2005) ‘“Saying no is no easy matter”. A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice’ BMC Health Services Research 5:70.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, B.; and Norheim, O.F: (2008) ‘“What lies beneath it all?” - an interview study of GPs’ attitudes to the use of guidelines’ BMC Health Services Research 8:218.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, B.G. (1997) ‘Restoring the balance: Evidence-based medicine put in its place’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 3(2):87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, K.; Harrison, S.; and Marshall, M. (2007) ‘Is the metaphor of ‘barriers to change’ useful in understanding implementation? Evidence from general medical practice’ Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 12(2):95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, K.; Harrison, S.; McDonald, R.; Grant, S.; Campbell, S.; and Guthrie, B. (2008) ‘Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: Responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract’ Sociology of Health and Illness 30(5):788–803.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, P.; Gribben, B.; Scott, A.; and Lay-Yee, R. (2000) ‘The ‘supply hypothesis’ and medical practice variation in primary care: Testing economic and clinical models of inter-practitioner variation’ Social Science and Medicine 50(3):407–418.
   Google Scholar
• Denny, K. (1999) ‘Evidence-based medicine and medical authority’ Journal of Medical Humanities 20(4):247–263.
   Google Scholar
• De Simone, J. (2006) ‘Reductionist inference-based medicine, i.e. EBM’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12(4):445–449.
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar, C.M.; Kofa, E.W.; and Slutsky, J.R. (2002) ‘Clinicians’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review’ The Medical Journal of Australia 177(9):502–506.
   Google Scholar
• Forsetlund, L.; and Bjorndal, A. (2002) ‘Identifying barriers to the use of research faced by public health physicians in Norway and developing an intervention to reduce them’ Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 7(1):10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R.C. (2000) ‘Medical uncertainty revisited’ in Albrecht, G.L., Fitzpatrick, R. and Scrimshaw C.S. (eds) The handbook of social studies in health and medicine SAGE Publications: London, pp. 409–425.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A.C.; and Sweeney, K. (2001) ‘Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: Qualitative study’ British Medical Journal 323(7321):1100–1102.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbay, J.; and le May, A. (2004) ‘Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed ‘mind-lines?’ Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care’ British Medical Journal 329(7473):1013.
   Google Scholar
• Grahame-Smith, D. (1995) ‘Evidence based medicine: Socratic dissent’ British Medical Journal 310:1126–1127.
   Google Scholar
• Iglehart, J.K. (2004) ‘Editor’s Note’ Health Affairs 10. Available at: http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.var.3v1 [Date of access: 6 March 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995) ‘Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups’ British Medical Journal 311:299–302.
   Google Scholar
• Kumpusalo, E.; Neittaanmaki, L.; Mattila, K.; Virjo, I.; Isokoski, M.; Kujala, S.; et al. (1994) ‘Professional identities of young physicians – a Finnish national survey’ Medical Anthropology Quarterly 8(1):69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, H. (2006) ‘Accounting for EBM: Notions of evidence in medicine’ Social Science and Medicine 62(11):2633–2645.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, C.; Faulkner, A.; Watkins, C.; Gray, S.; and Harvey, I. (1998) ‘Use of guidelines in primary care-practitioners’ perspectives’ Family Practice 15(2):105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Light, D. (1979) ‘Uncertainty and control in professional training’ Journal of Health and Social Behavior 20:310–322.
   Google Scholar
• Light, D.W (2003) ‘Towards a new professionalism in medicine: Quality, value and trust’ Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 123.
   Google Scholar
• Light, D.W (2003) ‘Towards a new professionalism in medicine: Quality, value and trust’ Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 123. Available at: http://www.tidsskriftet.no/index.php?seks_id=843776 [date of access: 6 March 2008].
   Google Scholar
• Markey, P.; and Schattner, P. (2001) ‘Promoting evidence-based medicine in general practice – the impact of academic detailing’ Family Practice 18(4):364–366.
   Google Scholar
• Michie, S.; and Johnston, M. (2004) ‘Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific’ British Medical Journal 328(7435):343–345.
   Google Scholar
• Mykhalovskiy, E. (2003) ‘Evidence-based medicine: Ambivalent reading and the clinical recontextualization of science’ Health (London) 7(3):331–352.
   Google Scholar
• Mykhalovskiy, E.; and Weir, L. (2004) ‘The problem of evidence-based medicine: Directions for social science’ Social Science and Medicine 59(5):1059–1069.
   Google Scholar
• NAV [The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Organisation]. (2007) Fastlegeordningen, Hovedtallsrapport [The regular GP scheme, Key statistical report] NAV, available at: http://www.nav.no/page?id=1073743257: Oslo [Date of access: 20 May 2008].
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.A. (2000) ‘Variation in GP referral rates: What can we learn from the literature?’ Family Practice 17(6):462–471.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2002) Enhancing Expenditure Control with a Decentralised Public Sector in Denmark OECD: Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2005) Economic Surveys. Country Reviews. Norway (No. 17).
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, A. (2005) ‘The English National Health Service: 1979–2005’ Health Economics 14:75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, K.; and Grime, J. (2003) ‘The cost and cost-effectiveness of PPIs: GP perspectives and responses to a prescribing dilemma and their implications for the development of patient-centred healthcare’ European Journal of General Practice 9(4):126–133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C. (2003) ‘Resisting evidence: The study of evidence-based medicine as a contemporary social movement’ Health (London) 7(3):267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, K.L.; Gild, W.M.; and Winans, E.V (1995) ‘Changes in clinical practice in response to reductions in reimbursement: Physician autonomy and resistance to bureaucratization’ Medical Anthropology Quarterly 9(4):476–492.
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisjonen (2005) [The Office of the Auditor General]. Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse om forvaltning av og måloppnåelse av fastlegeordningen [The Office of the Auditor General’s report regarding the management and achievements of the goals of the Regular General Practitioner Scheme.] Report No. 1 2005. Riksrevisjonen: Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, D.L.; Rosenberg, W.M.C.; Gray, J.A.M.; Haynes, R.B.; and Richardson, W.S. (1996) ‘Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t’ British Medical Journal 312(7023):71–72.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T.; and Harrison, S. (2008) ‘Professional legitimacy claims in the multidisciplinary workplace: The case of heart failure care’ Sociology of Health and Illness 30(2):289–308.
   Google Scholar
• Shuval, K.; Shachak, A.; Linn, S.; Brezis, M.; and Reis, S. (2007) ‘Evaluating primary care doctors’ evidence-based medicine skills in a busy clinical setting’ Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13(4):576–580.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S.; and Angell, A. (2001) ‘Evidence-based medicine, clinical uncertainty, and learning to doctor’ Journal of Health and Social Behavior 42(4):342–359.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S.; and Berg, M. (2003) The gold standard. The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care Temple University Press: Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Treweek, S.; Flottorp, S.; Fretheim, A.; Håvelsrud, K.; Kristoffersen, D.T.; Oxman, A.; et al. (2005) ‘Retningslinjer for allmennpraksis – blir de lest og blir de brukt? (Guidelines in general practice: Are they read and are they used?)’ Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 125:300–303.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg, D.E.; and Wennberg, J.E. (2003) ‘Addressing variations: is there hope for the future?’ Health Affairs Jul–Dec, W6 14.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. (2001a) ‘From professional to subcontractor – the swift decline of general practice: A rejoinder to N. Watts and N. Pinskier’ Health Sociology Review 10(2):55–59.
   Google Scholar
• White, K. (2001b) ‘What’s happening in General Practice: Capitalist monopolisation and state administrative control: A profession bailing out?’ Annual Review of Health Social Sciences 10:5–18.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper No 23. [Stortingsmelding nr 23. (1996–97) Trygghet og ansvarlighet. Om legetjenesten i kommunene og fastlegeordningen.] About the primary health care services. Sosial- og helsedepartementet: Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, K.W.; Chen, S.H.; Chiang, L.C.; Chen, L.C.; and Huang, J.L. (2006) ‘Survey of asthma care in Taiwan: A comparison of asthma specialists and general practitioners’ Annuals of Allergy Asthma Immunology 96(4):593–599.
   Google Scholar