Dreaming the impossible dream: Ordering risks in Australian maternity care policies

References

• Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council. (2008). Primary maternity services in Australia – A framework for implementation for primary maternity services. Canberra, ACT, Australia: The Maternity Services Interjurisdictional Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, H., Keirse, M. J., & Lancaster, P. (1998). Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: Population based study. British Medical Journal, 317, 384–388.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society:Towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2009). World risk society. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Biro, M., Waldenstrom, U., & Pannifex, J. (2000). Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service. A randomised control trial. Birth, 27(3), 168–174.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2007). Performing and reforming leaders, gender, educational restructuring and organizational change. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky, P. L. (2008). The control of childbirth: Women versus medicine through the ages. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K. (1989). The concept of regulation in the analysis of the organised world. Law and Policy, 11(1), 71–237.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Improving maternity services in Australia: A discussion paper from the Australian Government. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, S. (1999). Ordering risks. In D. Lupton (Ed), Risk and sociocultural theory (pp. 160–185). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, S., Pakulski, J., & Waters, M. (1992). Postmodernization: Change in advanced society. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Risk, calculable and incalculable. In D. Lupton (Ed), Risk and sociolcultural theory (pp. 131–159). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Ageing. (2009). Improving maternity services in Australia (maternity services review). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, NSW (2008). Primary maternity services in Australia: A framework for implementation, Prepared on behalf of the Maternity Services Inter-jurisdictional Committee, Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Victoria. (1990). Having a baby in Victoria. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services and Health. (1995). Australian hospital care study: Preliminary report. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forde, O. H. (1998). Is imposing risk awareness cultural imperialism? Social Science and Medicine, 47(9), 1155–1159.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). The history of sexuality. Vol. 1, An introduction (Robert Hurley Trans. from the French). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies, towards a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guilliland, K., & Pairman, S. (1995). The midwifery partnership: A model for practice. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Heimer, C., Petty, J. C., & Culyba, R. J. (2005). Risk and rules: the ‘legalization’ of medicine. In B. Hutter & M. Power (Eds.), Organizational encounters with risk (pp. 92–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodnett, E. D. (2001). Continuity of care givers for care during pregnancy and childbirth. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2000(2): CD000062.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, C. S. E., Davis, G. K., Brodie, P. M., Sheehan, A., Barclay, L. M., Wills, J., et al. (2001). Collaboration in maternity care: A randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108(1), 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, B. M. (2005). ‘Ways of seeing’: Understandings of risk in organizational settings. Organizational encounters with risk (pp. 67–91). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, B. M., & Power, M. (2005). Organizational encounters with risk: An introduction. Organizational encounters with risk (pp 1–32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K., & Davis, B. (2005). Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: Large prospective study in North America. British Medical Journal, 330, 1416–1422.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (1995). The medical model of the body as a site of risk: A case study of childbirth. In J. Gabe (Ed.), Medicine, health and risk: Sociological approaches (sociology of health and illness monograph series). Oxford, England: Blackwells.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (2000). Multiple visions or multiple aversions? Consumer representation, consultation and participation in maternity issues. The Annual Review of Health Social Sciences, 10, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (2005). Collaborative care in maternity services. International research in midwifery. New York, NY: Nova.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K. (2006). The plasticity of professional boundaries. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 341–352.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2002). Risk culture. In U. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 47–62). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leap, N., & Hunter, B. (1993). The midwife’s tale: An oral history from handywoman to professional midwife. London, England: Scarlet Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, M. S., & Ramano, A. (2007). Birth can safely take place at home and in birthing centres. Journal of Perinatal Education – Supplement, 16, 81S–88S.
   Google Scholar
• Lofquist, W. S., Cohen, M. A., & Rabe, M. A. (Eds.) (1997). Debating corporate crime. Highland Heights, KY: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Northern Kentucky University.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1994). The great debate about cholesterol: Medical controversy and the news media. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 334–339.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999). Introduction: risk and sociocultural theory. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociolcultural theory (pp. 1–11). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malpas, J., & Wickham, G. (1995). Governance and failure: The limits of sociology. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31(3), 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, C., & Page, L. (1996). Report on the evaluation of one-to-one midwifery. London, England: The Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust and Thames Valley University.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, L. (2000). Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A., & Thornton, S. L. (1995). Rethinking ‘moral panic’ for multi-mediated social worlds. British Journal of Sociology 46(4), 559–574.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy-Lawless, J. (1998). Reading birth and death – A history of obstetric thinking. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, O. (1997). Home vs hospital birth. In J. P. Neilson, C. A. Crowther, E. D. Hodnett, & G. F. Hofmeyr (Eds.), Pregnancy and childbirth module of the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (issue 1). Oxford, England: Cochrane Library.
   Google Scholar
• Pesce, A. (2009). President AMA (transcripts from Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee, Thursday, December, 17), Canberra, ACT, Australia: AMA.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything. London, England: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiger, K. (2006). The neoliberal quickstep: Contradictions in Australian maternity care policy. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 330–340.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, M. J., Hensley, M. J., Brinsmead, M. W., & Wlodarczyk, J. H. (1995). Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: A randomised trial. Medical Journal of Australia, 163(6), 289–193.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, B. (2004). The new politics of medicine. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shilling, C. (2003). The body and social theoy. (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J. (1992). Defining, explaining and managing risks. In J. Short, & L. Clarke, (Eds.), Organizations, uncertainties and risk (pp.3–23). Boulder, CO: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Skolbekken, J. A. (1995). The risk epidemic in medical journals. Social Science and Medicine, 40(3), 291–305.
   Google Scholar
• Tew, M. (1990). Safer childbirth? A critical history of maternity care. London, England: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. (2006). Contemporary economic sociology: Globalisation, production, inequality. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, B. (2008). The body & society: Explorations in social theory. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenstrom, U., & Turnbull, D. (1998). A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 1160–1170.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, E. (1989). Medical dominance: The division of labour in Australian health care. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar