The latent function of ‘responsibility for one’s health’ in Swedish healthcare priority-setting

References

• Buyx, A. (2005). Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: Why we don’t like it and why maybe we should. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(12), 871–874.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, A., & Norheim, O. (2006). Responsibility, fairness and rationing in health care. Health Policy, 76(3), 312–319.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, R. (1977). You are dangerous to your health – The ideology and politics of victim blaming. International Journal of Health Services, 7(4), 663–680.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. M., & McGuire, M. B. (1995). The political economy of responsibility in health and illness. Social Science and Medicine, 40(1), 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dore, R. P. (1961). Function and cause. American Sociological Review, 26(6), 843–853.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. (1959). The logic of functional analysis. In L. Gross (Ed.), Symposium on sociological theory (pp. 271–307). Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kieserling, A. (2004). Selbstbeschreibung und Fremdbeschreibung. Beiträge zur Soziologie soziologischen Wissens. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, M. (2010). Surprised by method – functional method and systems theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 11(3), Art. 12. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1003122
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. B., & Brosziewski, A. (2009). Observing society: Meaning, communication, and social systems. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1990a). Political theory in the welfare state. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1990b). Paradigm lost: Über die ethische Reflexion der Moral. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1997). Globalization or world society: How to conceive of modern society? International Review of Sociology, 7(1), 67–79.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2000). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2005a). Funktion und Kausalität. In N. Luhmann (Ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (pp. 11–38). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2005b). Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie. In N. Luhmann (Ed.), Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme (pp. 39–67). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. (2000). The ‘actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–120.
   Google Scholar
• Michailakis, D., & Schirmer, W. (2010). Agents of their health? How the Swedish Welfare State introduces expectations of individual responsibility. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(6), 930–947.
   Google Scholar
• Minkler, M. (1999). Personal responsibility for health? A review of the arguments and the evidence at century’s end. Health Education and Behavior, 26(1), 121–140.
   Google Scholar
• Nassehi, A. (2002). Politik des Staates oder Politik der Gesellschaft? Kollektivität als Problemformel des Politischen. In K. U. Hellmann, & R. Schmalz-Bruns (Eds.), Theorie der Politik. Niklas Luhmanns politische Soziologie (pp. 38–59). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Prioriteringscentrum. (2008). Resolving health care’s difficult choices. Survey of priority setting in Sweden and an analysis of principles and guidelines on priorities in health care. Linköping, Sweden: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisionen. (2004). Riktlinjer för prioriteringar inom hälso-och sjukvård. RiR 2004:9: Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, S. K. (2001). The evolution of human sociality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, W., & Hadamek, C. (2007). Steering as paradox. The ambiguous role of the political system in modern society. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 14(2), 133–150.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, W., & Michailakis, M. (2011). The responsibility principle. Contradictions of priority-setting in Swedish healthcare. Acta Sociologica, 54(3), 267–282.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmer, W., Weidenstedt, L., & Reich, W. (2012). Respect and agency: An empirical exploration. Current Sociology, 60(4), forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. L. (2005). Grundlagen der soziologischen Theorie Band 3. Sinnverstehen und Intersubjektivität – Hermeneutik, funktionale Analyse, Konversationsanalyse und Systemtheorie. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. (n.d.). Etisk plattform för prioriteringar i vården. Retrieved from http://www.socialstyrelsen. se/halso-ochsjukvard/prioriteringar/etiskplattform
   Google Scholar
• SOU. (1993). SOU 1993:93 Vårdens svåra val [Swedish Government official reports]. Stockholm, Sweden: Allmänna Förlaget.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. (1995). SOU 1995:5 Vårdens svåra val [Swedish Government official reports]. Stockholm, Sweden: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Government. (1996). Proposition [Government Bill] 1996/97:60. Prioriteringar inom hälso-och sjukvården. Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wikler, D. (1987). Who should be blamed for being sick? Health Education & Behavior, 14(1), 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wikler, D. (2002). Personal and social responsibility for health. Ethics & International Affairs, 16(2), 47–55.
   Google Scholar