Direct-to-consumer health genetic testing services: What commercial strategies for which socio-ethical issues?

References

• Aïach, P. (1994). La prévention, une idéologie de progrès? Agora Ethique Médecine Société, 30, 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Aïach, P. (1998). Les voies de la médicalisation. In P. Aïach & D. Delanoë (Eds.), L’ère de la médicalisation: Ecce homo sanitas (pp. 15–35). Paris, France: Éditions Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Bibeau, G. (2004). Le Québec transgénique: Science, marché, humanité. Montréal, QC: Editions Boréal.
   Google Scholar
• Borry, P., Howard, H., Sénécal, K., & Avard, D. (2009). Ethics watch direct-to-consumer genome scanning services. Also for children? Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(1), 8–8.
   Google Scholar
• Canguilhem, G. (1966). Le normal et le pathologique. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, J. J. (2007). Introduction to over the counter genetic testing (Unpublished communication). In génétiques en accès libre et pharmacogénétique: Quels enjeux individuels et collectifs en Europe? Paris, France: European Council.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalisation of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365–388.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ducournau, P., & Strand, R. (2009). Trust, distrust and co-production: The relationship between research biobanks and donors. In J. H. Solbakk, S. Holm, & B. Hofmann (Eds.), The ethics of research biobanking (pp. 115–130). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duster, T. (1990). Back door to Eugenics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel, E. F., & Geransar, R. (2009). Framing genetic risk: Trust and credibility markers in online direct-to-consumer advertising for genetic testing. New Genetics and Society, 28(4), 339–362.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, D., & Memmi, D. (Eds.). (2004). Le Gouvernement des corps. Paris, France: Editions de l’EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1976). La volonté de savoir. Paris, France: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et écrits. La politique de santé au XVIIIème siècle. Paris, France: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, S., & Novas, C. (Eds.). (2008). Biosocialities, genetics and the social sciences: Making biologies and identities. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1976). Gender advertisements. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 3(2), 69–154.
   Google Scholar
• Gourraud, -A., McElroy, P., Caillier, J., Johnson, A., Santaniello, A., Hauser, L., & Oksenberg, R. (2011). Aggregation of multiple sclerosis genetic risk variants in multiple and single case families. Annals of Neurology, 69, 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A. (2009). From genetic risk to post-genomic uncertainties: Nutrigenomics and the birth of the ‘genetic entrepreneur’. New Genetics and Society, 28(2), 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, S. L., & Johnston, S. C. (2009). Personalised genetic scans: With gifts like these.… Annals of Neurology, 65(3), 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hennen, L., Sauter, A., & van den Cruyce, E. (2009). Direct to consumer genetic testing, final report. Brussels, Belgium: ETAG.
   Google Scholar
• Hennen, L., Sauter, A., & van Den Cruyce, E. (2010). Direct to consumer genetic testing: Insights from an internet scan. New Genetics and Society, 29(2), 167–186.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, S., Javitt, G., & Melzer, D. (2008). The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Legal. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 9, 161–182.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, H., & Borry, P. (2008). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: More questions than benefits? Personalised Medicine, 5(4), 317–320.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, H. C., & Borry, P. (2012). Is there a doctor in the house? The Journal Community Genetics, 3, 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, D. J., Khoury, M. J., & Drazen, J. M. (2008). Letting the genome out of the bottle – Will we get our wish? New England Journal of Medicine, 358, 105–107.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsdottir, J., Gorin, M. B., Conley, Y. P., Ferrell, R. E., & Weeks, D. E. (2009). Interpretation of genetic association studies: Markers with replicated highly significant odds ratios may be poor classifiers. PLoS Genetics, 5(2), e1000337.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, A. C., Gwinn, M., Bradley, L. A., Oostra, B. A., Van Duijn, C. M., & Khoury, M. J. (2008). A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalise health interventions. American Journal of Human Genetics, 82(3), 593–599.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, M. L., Fishman, J. R., & Lambrix, M. A. (2010). Personal genomics and individual identities: Motivations and moral imperatives of early users. New Genetics and Society, 29(3), 261–290.
   Google Scholar
• Memmi, D. (2003). Faire vivre et laisser mourir: Le gouvernement contemporain de la naissance et de la mort. Paris, France: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, D. (2011). Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for Alzheimer and other diseases: Lessons from two cases. New Genetics and Society, 30(1), 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, T. M., Krumholz, H. M., Lifton, R. P., & Spertus, J. A. (2007). Non-validation of reported genetic risk factors for acute coronary syndrome in a large-scale replication study. Journal of American Medical Association, 297, 1551–1561.
   Google Scholar
• Nordgren, A., & Juengst, E. T. (2009). Can genomics tell me who I am? Essentialistic rhetoric in direct-to-consumer DNA testing. New Genetics and Society, 28(2), 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Omran, A. R. (1971). The epidemiologic transition: A theory of the epidemiology of population change. The Milbank Quarterly, 83(4), 731–757.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1996). Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In P. Rainbow (Ed.), Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, Power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saukko, P. M., Reed, M., Britten, N., & Hogarth, S. (2010). Negotiating the boundary between medicine and consumer culture: Online marketing of nutrigenetic tests. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 744–753.
   Google Scholar
• Sénécal, K., Borry, P., Howard, H. C., & Avard, D. (2009). Les tests génétiques offerts directement aux consommateurs: Vue d’ensemble des normes et politiques applicables. GenEdit, 7(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, R. (2008). The on-line promotion and sale of nutrig-enomic services. Genetics in Medicine, 10(11), 784–796.
   Google Scholar
• Tutton, R., & Prainsack, B. (2012). Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(7), 1081–1095.
   Google Scholar
• William-Jones, B. (2006). Be ready against cancer, now: Direct-to-consumer advertising for genetic testing. New Genetics and Society, 25(1), 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C., & Gregory-Jones, S. (2010). Size of the direct-to-consumer genomic testing market. Genetics in Medicine, 12(9), 594.
   Google Scholar