Drawn into mathematics: Applying student ideas about learning

References

• Adler, J., Ball, D., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotna, J. (2005). Refl ections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 359–381.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Reder, L., & Simon, H. (1997). Situative versus cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher, 26, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, L., & Lassen, L. M. (2006). Unraveling learning, learning styles, learning strategies and metacognition. Education + Training, 48, 178–189.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Refl ection: Turning experience into learning. London, England: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, E., & Fales, A. (1983). Refl ective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanist Psychology, 23(2), 99–117.
   Google Scholar
• Cleary, K., Danaher, P. A., Midgley, W., O’Neill, S., & Son, J.-B. (2007). Editors introduction to special theme issue: Meanings emerging in practice (Part 3). International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 3(3), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. V. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39, 250–256.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 131–147.
   Google Scholar
• Deed, C. (2008). Disengaged boys’ perspectives about learning. Education 3–13, 36, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, P. J., & Downey, P. M. (2005). Concept muraling: Dropping visual crumbs along the instructional trail. The Reading Teacher, 58, 376–380.
   Google Scholar
• Golomb, C. (1992). The child’s creation of the pictorial world. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1972). The visual image: Its place in communication. Scientific American, 272, 82–96.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. (2009). A framework bite on contextualizing, framing, and positioning: A companion to Son and
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone. Cognition and Instruction, 27(3), 269–275.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J., & Collins, A. (2008). Commentary on the final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Educational Researcher, 37(9), 616–623.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (1996). Revisiting voice. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual vies of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1, 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, A., & Lindsay, G. (2006). Emerging issues. In A. Lewis & G. Lindsay (Eds.), Researching children’s perspectives (pp. 189–197). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (2005). Learning to refl ect and to attribute constructively as basic components of self regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 351–372.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Refl ection: Issues related to improving professors’ teaching and students’ learning. Instructional Science, 28, 363–385.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. L. (2004). The significance of students: Can increasing “student voice” in schools lead to gains in youth development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, K., Ellis, S., Weinstock, W., Tarrant, J., & Hallmond, S. (2006). Re-engaging disaffected pupils in learning: Insights for policy and practice. Improving Schools, 9, 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113–125.
   Google Scholar
• Serig, D. (2006). A conceptual structure of visual metaphor. Studies in Art Education, 47(3), 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R., & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427–515.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen, D. (2006). Student knowledge, engagement, and voice in educational reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 345 358.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. J. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Affl erback, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2008). How did we get from there to here? An evolutionary perspective on embodied cognition. In P. Calvo & T. Gomila (Eds.), Directions for an embodied cognitive science: Towards an integrated approach. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar