Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) pedagogies in Queensland

References

• Alexander, R. (2004). Still no pedagogy? Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 7–33.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2011). Draft shape of the Australian curriculum: Languages. Sydney, NSW: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Berthold, M. (Ed.). (1995). Rising to the bilingual challenge. Canberra, ACT: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, G. (1995). Developing teaching materials for immersion programs. In M. Berthold (Ed.), Rising to the bilingual challenge Canberra, ACT: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chilcott, T. (2013, August 5). School subject review considers axing mandatory languages. The Courier Mail. Retrieved from http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/school-subjectreview-considers-axing-mandatory-languages/story-fnihsrf2-1226691099731
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2012). Australia in the Asian century, white paper. Retrieved from http://asiancentury.dpmc.gov.au/white-paper
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL – A pedagogical approach. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., pp. 97–111). London, England: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1996). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Toronto, ON: California Association for Bilingual Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (1986). Bilingualism in education. London, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, N. (1995). Dual focus approach for immersion teaching. In M. Berthold (Ed.), Rising to the bilingual challenge (pp. 97–119). Canberra, ACT: The National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, B. (2009). Bilingual education in the Northern Territory: Principles, policy and practice. Paper presented at the AIATSIS Research Symposium, June, Visions Theatre, National Museum of Australia, Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deller, S., & Price, C. (2007). Teaching other subjects through English. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Education Queensland. (2007). Immersion program information handbook. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/curriculum/area/lote/immersion.html
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Hall Hayley, M., & Austin, T. (2004). Content-based second Language teaching and learning. An interactive approach. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, C. (2009). The multilingual subject. What language learners say about their experience and why it matters. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lessow-Hurley, J. (2005). The foundations of dual language instruction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lo Bianco, J., & Slaughter, Y. (2009). Australian education review: Second languages and Australian schooling (pp. 1–84). Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual education and content and language integrated learning. Paris, France: International Association for Cross-cultural Communication, Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua), University of Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Mehisto, P., Frigols, M.-J., & Marsh, D. (2008). Uncovering CLIL. London, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, B. A. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F. (Ed.). (2003). International handbook of curriculum research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Department of Education and Training. (2010): Immersion programs. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/curriculum/area/lote/immersion.html
   Google Scholar
• Reimers, F. (2009). Global competency: Educating the world. Harvard International Review, 30(4), 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Smala, S. (2009). Introducing: Content and language integrated learning. Paper presented at the Australian Curriculum Studies Association Annual Conference, October, Canberra, ACT. Retrieved from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/simone%20smala%20-%20introducing%20content%20and%20language.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smala, S. (2012a). CLIL down under: External support structures to overcome the ‘tyranny of distance’. In D. Marsh & O. Meyer (Eds.), Quality interfaces: Examining evidence and exploring solutions in CLIL (pp. 212–224). Eichstaett, Germany: Eichstaett Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smala, S. (2012b). CLIL programmes in Australia: Multilingual schooling contexts. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 1(1), 117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Smala, S. (2014, forthcoming). Sole fighter mentality: Stakeholder agency in CLIL programs in Queensland. Language Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Tochon, F. V. (2009). The key to global understanding: World languages education – Why schools need to adapt. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 650–681.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Craen, P. (2007). Cognitive development and bilingualism in primary schools: Teaching maths in a CLIL environment. In D. Marsh & D. Wolf (Eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals, CLIL in Europe (pp. 185–200). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar