74
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Aligning pedagogy and technology: A case study using clickers in a first-year university education course

, &
Pages 229-241 | Received 28 Jul 2013, Accepted 05 Aug 2013, Published online: 17 Dec 2014

  • Abrandt-Dahlgren, M., & Öberg, G. (2001). Questioning to learn and learning to question: Structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. Higher Education, 41, 263–282.
  • Anderson, L. S., Healy, A. F., Kole, J. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2011). Conserving time in the classroom: The clicker technique. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6(8), 1457–1462.
  • Atkinson, M., & Hunt, A. (2008). Inquiry-guided learning in sociology. Teaching Sociology, 36(1), 1–7.
  • Barnett, J. (2006). Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: Student perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 474–494.
  • Barraket, J. (2005). Teaching research method using a student-centred approach? Critical reflections on practice. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2(2), 64–74.
  • Beatty, I., & Gerace, W. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 146–162.
  • Broussard, B. (2012). To click or not to click: Learning to teach to the microwave generation. Nurse Education in Practice, 12, 3–5.
  • Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2012). Against best practice: Uncertainty, outliers and local studies in educational research. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 38(3), 343–357.
  • Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9–20.
  • Campbell, C., & Monk, S. (2012). How do we get students talking in first year courses? Engaging students using learner response systems. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2012 (pp. 3541–3546). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Charman, D. J., & Fullerton, H. (1995). Interactive lectures: A case study in a geographical concepts course. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 19, 57–68.
  • Ertmer, P., Sadaf, A., & Ertmer, D. (2011). Student-content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 157–186.
  • Farmer, L. (2007). What is the question? IFLA Journal, 33(41), 41–49.
  • Fobes, C., & Kaufman, P. (2008). Critical pedagogy in the sociology classroom: Challenges and concerns. Teaching Sociology, 36(1), 26–33.
  • Gray, K., & Steer, D. (2012). Personal response systems and learning: It is the pedagogy that matters, not the technology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(5), 80–88.
  • Hall, R. H., Collier, H. L., Thomas, M. L., & Hilgers, M. G. (2005). A student response system for increasing engagement, motivation, and learning in high enrolment lectures. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2005, Paper 255. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2005/255
  • Hoekstra, A., & Mollborn, S. (2012). How clicker use facilitates existing pedagogical practices in higher education: Data from interdisciplinary research on student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 303–320.
  • Keller, C., Finkelstein, N., Perkins, K., Pollock, S., Turpen, C., & Dubson, M. (2007). Research-based practices for effective clicker use. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference, American Institute of Physics. doi: 10.1063/1.2820913. Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/per/items/detail.cfm?ID=9085
  • Kerr, A. (2011). Teaching and learning in large classes at Ontario Universities: An exploratory study. Toronto, ON: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.
  • Koenig, K. (2010). Building acceptance for pedagogical reform through wide-scale implementation of clickers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(3), 46–50.
  • Kolikant, Y. B.-D., Drane, D., & Calkins, S. (2010). ‘Clickers’ as catalysts for transformation of teachers. College Teaching, 58(4), 127–135.
  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking teaching for the knowledge society. Educause Review, 37, 16–25.
  • Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science. London, England: Routledge.
  • Lingard, B., Hayes, D., & Mills, M. (2003). Teachers and productive pedagogies: Contextualising, conceptualising, utilising. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 11(3), 399–424.
  • Lyons, H. (2009). Case study research methodology for publishing developments in ICT-facilitated learning in higher education – A prescriptive approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 27–39.
  • McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2008). Mapping the digital terrain: New media and social software as catalysts for pedagogical change. Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne. Retrieved from http://cms.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
  • Milner-Bolotin, M., Antimirova, T., & Petrov, A. (2010). Clickers beyond the first-year science classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(2), 14–18.
  • Murray, G., & Poyatos-Matas, C. (2004). Layered teaching with large classes. Paper presented at the ETL Conference, Logan Campus, Griffith University. Retrieved from http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/2460/30488.pdf?sequence=1
  • Oliver, R. G. (2007). Using mobile technologies to support learning in large on campus university classes. Proceedings of ASCILITE Conference, Singapore, 788–98. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/oliver.pdf
  • Patterson, B., Kilpatrick, J., & Woebkenberg, E. (2010). Evidence for teaching practice: The impact of clickers in a large classroom environment. Nurse Education Today, 30, 603–607.
  • Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H., da Silva Lopes, B., Moreira, A., & Watts, M. (2012). Contexts for questioning: Two zones of teaching and learning in undergraduate science. Higher Education, 64, 557–571. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9512-9
  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learn to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Sevian, H., & Robinson, W. E. (2011). Clickers promote learning in all kinds of classes – Small and large, graduate and undergraduate, lecture and lab. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(3), 14–18.
  • White, P. J. T., Delaney, D. G., Syncox, D., Akerberg, O. A., & Alters, B. (2011). Clicker implementation models. Educause Quarterly, 34(4). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/clicker-implementation-models
  • Wit, E. (2003). Who wants to be… The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections, 3(2), 14–20.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.