Association of Domain-Specific Knowledge and Analytical Ability with Insight Problem Solving in Mathematics

References

• Adelson, B. (2003). Issues in scientific creativity: Insight, perseverance, and personal technique. Profiles of the 2002 Franklin Institute Laureates. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 240, 163–189.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. J. & Bowden, E.M. (2000). The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be solved insight problems. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1231–1241.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, E. M., & Beeman, M. J., (1998). Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems. Psychological Science, 6, 435–440.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 730–737.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, R. E., & Runco, M. A. (2000). Developmental trends in the evaluative and divergent thinking of children. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 417–437.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, G. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 389–402.
   Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), whole no. 270.
   Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Lockhart, R. S. (1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds). The nature of insight, pp.197–228. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaak, M. I., & Just, M. A. (1995). Constraints on thinking in insight and invention. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds), The nature of insight, pp.281–325. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E.M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J.L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., Reber, P.J., & Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. Public Library of Science Biology, 2, E97.
   Google Scholar
• Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), whole no. 248.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 10, 115–143.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity, pp.211–228. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach, pp.249–268. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, O. (1995). Cognitive styles and experience in solving insight problems: Replication and extension. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 291–298.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1991). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. (2nd ed). New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1995). The search for insight: Grappling with Gestalt Psychology’s unanswered questions. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds), The nature of insight, pp.3–32. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. (1986). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 288–296.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, M. A., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Attention and working memory in insight problem-solving. In B.G. Bara, L. Barsalou & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.) Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.1571–1576. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Poincare, H. (1958). The value of science. In S. J. Gould (series editor, 2001), Henri Poincare. New York: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1992). Children’s divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review, 12, 233–264.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and non-gifted children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 212–218.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U. (2009). Test of the three-mathematical minds (M3) for the identification of mathematically gifted students. Roeper Review, 31, 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U., & Maker, C. J. (2006). Developmental variation in children’s creative mathematical thinking as a function of schooling, age and knowledge. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 279–291.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight, pp.229–251. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, D. M. (2003). The influence of cognitive style on insight problem solving. Unpublished master’s thesis. Buffalo State College, State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful Intelligence. New York: Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. (1995), The nature of insight. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2008). Applied Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B., Finke, R. A., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Creativity and the mind: Discovering the genius within. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and other myths. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: A taxonomy of problems. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight, pp.157–196. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity, pp.226–250. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of several “insight” problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. W. (1994). A note on the influence of outliers on parametric and nonparametric tests. Journal of General Psychology, 121(4), 391–401.
   Google Scholar