Developing a scoring rubric for a course-specific pair work telephoning speaking assessment using intuitive and data-based methods

References

• Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H.D. (2004). Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. White Plains, New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J.D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2003). Second language interaction: Current perspectives and future trends. Language Testing, 20(4), 369–383. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, J.H.A.L. & Bernstein, J. (n.d.). Relating PhonePass overall scores to the Council of Europe framework level descriptors. Retrieved November 25, 2008, from http://www.ordinate.com/pdf/EuroSpeech.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donna, S. (2000). Teach business English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N.C. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: word structure, collocation, word-class, and meaning. In Vocabulary: description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.122–139.
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. London: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). Scoring language tests and assessments. In Fulcher, G. & Davidson, F. (Eds.), Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book, pp.91–114. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• He, L., & Dai, Y. (2006). A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET-SET group discussion. Language Testing, 23(3), 370–401. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. (2002). Teaching and researching speaking. Harlow, Great Britain: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T., & O’Hagan, S. (2008). Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 24–49. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/29/1/24.
   Google Scholar
• Kormos, J. (1999). Simulating conversations in oral-proficiency assessment: A conversation analysis of role plays and non-scripted interviews in language exams. Language Testing, 16(2), 163–188. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.W. (2006). Dependability of scores for a new ESL speaking assessment consisting of integrated and independent tasks. Language Testing, 23(2), 131–166. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (1994). Words and their properties: arguments for a lexical approach to pedagogical grammar. In Terence Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar, pp.99–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, B.K. (2003). Language assessment and program evaluation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, H.S. (1983). Techniques in testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T.F. (1997). ‘Interaction’ in second language performance assessment: whose performance? Applied Linguistics, 18(4), 446–466. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• North, B. (2000). The development of a common framework scale of language proficiency. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• North, B. & Schneider, G. (1998). Scaling descriptors for language proficiency scales. Language Testing, 15(2), 217–263. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1998). Language teaching methodology. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, B., Weir, C.J. & Saville, N. (2002). Using observation checklists to validate speaking-test tasks. Language Testing, 19(1), 33–56. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, P. (2000). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (3rd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawaki, Y. (2007). Construct validation of analytic rating scales in a speaking assessment: Reporting a score profile and a composite. Language Testing, 24(3), 355–390. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18(3), 275–302. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, S. (2000). Communicating in business: A short course for business English students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, N. (1987). Testing spoken language: A handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Upshur, J.A. & Turner C.E. (1999). Systematic effects in the rating of second-language speaking ability: Test method and learner discourse. Language Testing, 16(1), 82–111. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, F.S. (2007). A conversation-analytic hermeneutic rating protocol to assess L2 oral pragmatic competence. Language Testing, 24(2), 155–183. Retrieved October 5, 2008, from EbscoHost database.
   Google Scholar
• Weigle, S.C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, C.J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. New York, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, X. (2007). Evaluating analytic scoring for the TOEFL® Academic Speaking Test (TAST) for operational use. Language Testing, 24(2), 251–286. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from www.ets.org.
   Google Scholar