Developing and sustaining new pedagogies: A case for embedding language, literacy and academic skills in vocational education curriculum

References

• Bartholomae, D (1999) ‘Ourselves – myself, yourself’, Sociology in Australia, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B, Reveles, J and Kelly, G (2005), ‘Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science education’, Science Education, 89: 779–802.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, N (2002) ‘Dovetailing language and content: teaching balanced argument in legal problem answer writing’ English for Specific Purposes 21: 321–345.
   Google Scholar
• Comber, B and Kamler, B (2004) ‘Getting out of deficit: pedagogies of reconnection’, Teacher Education, 15(3): 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Creese, A (2002) ‘The discursive construction of power in teacher partnerships: language and subject specialists in mainstream schools’, TESOL Quarterly, 36(4): 597–616.
   Google Scholar
• Crosswhite, J (1996), The rhetoric of reason: writing and the attractions of argument, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, C (2006) ‘Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right?’, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4): 454–475.
   Google Scholar
• Furze, B (2008), Sociology in today’s world, Cengage Learning, South Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, JP (2009) ‘Identity without identification’, in Why Writing Matters: Issues of access and identity in writing research and pedagogy, Eds. A Carter, T Lillis and S Parkin, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Graff G, Birkenstein C, and Durst R (2009) They say/I say: the moves that matter in academic writing, WW Norton & Co., New York.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, MAK (2004) Introduction to functional grammar, Edward Arnold, London.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, MAK (2003) ‘Written language standard language global language’, World Englishes, 22(4): 405–418.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R (1999) ‘The disempowerment game: Bourdieu and language’ Literacy, Linguistics and Education,10(1): 25–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, S (2004) ‘Managing attitude in undergraduate academic writing: a focus on the introductions to research reports’ In Analysing academic writing, Eds. L Ravelli and R Ellis, Continuum, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K (2009) Academic discourse, Continuum, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K (2005), Metadiscourse, Continuum, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R (1998) Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing, studies in written language and literacy, vol. 5, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R and Simpson, J (1990) ‘Who’s who in academic writing?’ in Critical language awareness, Ed. N Fairclough, Longman, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jory J (2004) The WAC Clearinghouse Bibliography, accessed at http://wac.colostate.edu/bib/index.cfm?category=9999, viewed at 23/01/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S (2010), ‘Research for praxis: knowing doing’, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(1): 9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, TM (2001) Student writing: access, regulation, desire, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, JR and Rose, D (2008) Genre relations: mapping culture, Equinox, London.
   Google Scholar
• Martin JR and White, RR (2005), The language of evaluation: appraisal in English, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K and Muller, J (2007) ‘A sociology for the transmission of knowledges’, In Language, Knowledge and Pedagogy: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives, Eds. F Christie, and J Martin, pp. 14–33, Continuum, London.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, R (2002) Learning to learn: the next step: teaching adults how to read and write the academic discourse, Language Australia for Victoria University, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Messinis, G, Sheehan, P and Miholcic, Z (2008) The diversity and performance of the student population at victoria university: a preliminary analysis, Centre For Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Moraitis, P and McCormack, R (1995) Public literacy: a curriculum for basic adult education, Adult, Community and Further Education Board, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, M 2007, ‘Students’ interim literacies as a dynamic resource for teaching and transformation’, Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 25(1): 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, AD (2004) ‘Performativity and language studies’, Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 1(1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, L (2006) ‘Owning (up to) reflective writing in social work education’, Social Work Education, 25(8): 785–797.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, W (1971) Blaming the victim, Vintage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, M (1977) Errors and expectations, Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, MJ Achugar, M and Oteíza, T (2004) ‘The grammar of history: enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language’, TESOL Quarterly, 38(1) Spring: 67–93.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M, Greer, S and Taylor, S (2008) ‘Literacy in History: language and meaning’ Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(2): 174– 187.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, L (2008) ‘Improving the experience of TAFE award-holders in higher education’, International Journal of Training Research, 6(2): 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L (2010a) Why knowledge matters in curriculum: a social realist argument, Routledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L (2010b), ‘The structure of pedagogic discourse as a relay for power: The case of competency-based training’, In Toolkits, Translation Devices and Conceptual Accounts: Essays on Basil Bernstein’s Sociology of Knowledge, Eds. P Singh, AR Sadovnik and SF Semel, Peter Lang, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Young, MFD (2007) Bringing knowledge back in: from social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar