User choice: Who’s the user? Who’s the chooser?

References

• Adams, R (2005) ‘Allocation of VET funding by state training authorities’, in Funding and financing vocational education and training. Research readings, ed. K. Ball, NCVER, Adelaide, pp. 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D (1998) ‘Students as clients: Refocussing training market reform’, in The market for vocational education and training, eds. C. Robinson and R. Kenyon, NCVER, Adelaide, pp. 307–322.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D (1999) ‘Vocational education reform and students: Redressing silences and omissions’, The Australian Educational Researcher, 26(2), pp. 99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D (2005) Trading places: The impact and outcomes of market reform in vocational education and training, NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D (2006) Trading places: The impact and outcomes of market reform in vocational education and training. Support document, NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, MW (2007) ‘Education, markets, and an audit culture’, International Journal of Educational Policies, 1(1), pp. 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) (2001) ‘Training and User Choice. The employer perspective’, The ACCI Review May (2001). 75.
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Training Authority (ANTA) (1996) Developing the training market of the future. A consultation paper, ANTA, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Training Authority (ANTA) (2004) Statement of User Choice Policy, ANTA, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Avenarius, H (1992) ‘Welche Folgerungen ergeben sich aus der rechtlichen Stellung von Pflichtschulen für eine Strukturreform der Sekundarstufe 1’, Forum e – Zeitschrift des Verbandes Bildung und Erziehung, 45(11–12), 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Avenarius, H (2001) Einführung in das Schulrecht, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, SJ, and Vincent, C (1998) ‘‘I heard it on the grapevine’: ‘hot’ knowledge and school choice’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 377–400.
   Google Scholar
• Bannikoff, K (1998) Report of the TAFE review taskforce. A plan to safeguard TAFE (Bannikoff Report), TAFE Queensland, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S (2006) 18. Sitzung des Ausschusses für Schule und Weiterbildung am 26.04.(2006) Verhandlungspunkt: Schulbezirke Berufskollegs/Zweiter Berufsschultag, Ausschussprotokoll 14/187.
   Google Scholar
• Belfield, C, Levin, H (2002) ‘The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: A review for the United States’, Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 279–341.
   Google Scholar
• Blossfeld, HP, Bos, W, Lenzen, D, Müller-Böling, D, Oelkers, J, Prenzel, M, and Wößmann, L (Aktionsrat Bildung) (2007) Bildungsgerechtigkeit. Jahresgutachten (2007) VS Verlag, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Bofinger, P, Franz, W, Schmidt, CM, Weder di Mauro, B., and Wiegard, W (Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung) (2009) Jahresgutachten 2009/10: Die Zukunft nicht aufs Spiel setzen.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C, Proctor, H, and Sherington, G (2009) School choice. How parents negotiate the new school market in Australia, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• County Association NRW (Landkreistag NRW) (2006) Stellungnahme 14/398 zum Gesetzentwurf eines Zweiten Gesetzes zur Änderung des Schulgesetzes für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (21.02.2006).
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, JS, and Holding, AC 1987, Skills for Australia, AGPS, Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Deißinger, T (1998) Beruflichkeit als “organisierendes Prinzip” der deutschen Berufsausbildung, EUSL, Markt Schwaben.
   Google Scholar
• Deißinger, T (2004) ‘Der Übergang von der Schule in die Arbeitswelt und die Vision eines ‘open training market’: australische Erfahrungen und Entwicklungen’, in Perspektiven der beruflichen Bildung und der Berufsbildungspolitik im europäischen und internationalen Kontext, ed. D. Münk, W. Bertelsmann, Bielefeld, pp. 13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Deißinger, T (2006) ‘Wege und Umwege zum EQF – Fragestellungen und Probleme aus nationaler Perspektive’, in Auf dem Weg zum Nationalen Qualifikationsrahmen, ed. Verband der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer an Wirtschaftsschulen (vLw), pp. 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Deveson, I (1990) Training costs of award restructuring. Report of the training costs review committee (Deveson Report), AGPS, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung) (2009) Initial and continuing vocational education and training statistics. URL: http://berufe.bibb-service.de/Z/B/30/99600000.pdf (26.01.2010).
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, F, and Selby Smith, C (2001) The experience of User Choice. Do size and location of the firm make a difference? A re-analysis of the results obtained from a survey of employer views conducted by the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in March (2001) Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 40.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, F, and Selby Smith, C (2003a) The User Choice experience of Australian firms. A further investigation, Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 49.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, F, and Selby Smith, C 2003b, An investigation of ACCI’s User Choice proposals, Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 47.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrier, F, Dumbrell, T, and Burke, G (2008) Vocational education and training providers in competitive training markets, NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, B (1991) Young people’s participation in post-compulsory education and training. Report of the Australian Education Council Review Committee (Finn Review), AGPS, Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, FC (1992) ‘School choice policy in France: Success and limitations’, Educational Policy, 6, 4, pp. 429–443.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M (1955) ‘The role of government in education’, in Economics and the public interest, ed. R.A. Solo, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, J (2003) What impact is implementing a quality system having on the vocational education and training classroom?, NCVER, Leabrook.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S, Machin, S, and Silva, O (2008) ‘Choice, competition and pupil achievement’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(4), 912–947.
   Google Scholar
• Goozee, G (2001) The development of TAFE in Australia, NCVER, Leabrook.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R (2001) ‘Training reform in Australia – Implications of a shift from a supply to a demand-driven VET system’, in Berufliche Bildung zwischen nationaler Tradition und globaler Entwicklung. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Berufsbildungsforschung, ed. T. Deißinger, Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 231–254.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R, and Deißinger, T (2003) ‘Learning cultures for apprenticeships: a comparison of Germany and Australia’, in Enriching learning cultures. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Post-compulsory Education and Training, eds. J. Searle, I. Yashin-Shaw and D. Roebuck, Australian Academic Press, Brisbane, pp. 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hellwig, S (2008) Zur Vereinbarkeit von Competency-Based Training (CBT) und Berufsprinzip. Konzepte der Berufsbildung im Vergleich, VS Verlag, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Hilmer, FG (1993) National competition policy. Report of the Independent Committee of Inquiry into Competition Policy in Australia (Hilmer Report), AGPS, Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Hippach-Schneider, U, Krause, M, and Woll, C. (2007) Vocational education and training in Germany – short description, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, CM (ed.) (2003) The economics of school choice. A National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, B (1981) Comparative education. Some considerations of method, Allen & Unwin, London.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, K (2009) ‘Freie Schulwahl im dualen System: Chancen und Risiken’, in Erträge und Perspektiven berufs- und wirtschaftspädagogischer Forschung, eds. E. Wuttke, H. Ebner and B. Fürstenau, Barbara Budrich, Opladen/Farmington Hills.
   Google Scholar
• Jülich, C (2006) Das neue Schulgesetz Nordrhein-Westfalen vom 15. Februar 2005 in der Fassung der Änderungsgesetze vom 13. und 27. Juni 2006. Bearbeitete Textausgabe mit Einführung, Anmerkungen und ausführlichem Stichwortverzeichnis, 2nd ed., Luchterhand, München.
   Google Scholar
• Kangan, M (1974) TAFE in Australia: Report on needs in technical and further education. Report of the Australian Committee on Technical and Further Education (ACOTAFE) (Kangan Report), AGPS, Canberra ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, P, and Hall, W (eds.) (1994) Kangan: 20 years on: a commemoration: TAFE 1974–1994, NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J, and Fitzclarence, L (1998) ‘Institutions with designs: consuming school children’, Journal of Education Policy, 13(6), 661–677.
   Google Scholar
• Key organisations representing municipal school administration in NRW (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der kommunalen Spitzenverbände NRW) (2006) Stellungnahme (14/434) zum Zweiten Gesetz zur Änderung des Schulgesetzes für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (19.05.2006).
   Google Scholar
• Knight, B, and Mlotkowski, P (2009) An overview of vocational education and training in Australia and its links to the labour market, NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG Consulting (1999) National evaluation of User Choice. Report to ANTA, ANTA, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG Consulting (2003) Impact of User Choice policy on the VET system. Report to ANTA, KPMG, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Lauder, H, Hughes, D, and Watson, S (1999) ‘The introduction of educational markets in New Zealand: questions and consequences’, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 34(1), 86–98.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, KS and Van Velzen, BAM (1990/91) ‘A look at choice in the Netherlands’, Educational Leadership, 48(4), 66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C (2003) ‘Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools’, American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 395–443.
   Google Scholar
• McRae, T (2001) Review of the WA training sector: positioning the training sector for excellence. Report of the WADOT Review Group (McRae Report), WADOT, East Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, JS (1859) On liberty (edn 1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministers of Vocational Education Employment and Training (MOVEET) (1992) Common and agreed national goals for vocational education and training, DEET, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for School and Further Education NRW (Ministerium für Schule und Weiterbildung des Landes NRW) (ed.) (2006) Neues Schulgesetz NRW. Sonderausgabe zum Amtsblatt des Ministeriums für Schule und Weiterbildung, Ritterbach, Düsseldorf.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, T (1998) ‘Competitiveness is the key’, in The market for vocational education and training, eds. C. Robinson and R. Kenyon, NCVER, Leabrook, pp. 175–185.
   Google Scholar
• National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) (1997) Developing the training market of the future. A review of research literature prepared as a submission by NCVER to the Australian National Training Authority, NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) (2009a) Australian vocational education and training statistics: Students and courses (2008) NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) (2009b) Australian vocational education and training statistics: Apprentice and trainees. Annual (2008) NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, C, Hill, D, Smith, E, and Smith, A (1999) ‘Policy issues in the implementation of ‘’User Choice’’ in the Australian training market’, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 51(1), 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• NRW School Law (Schulgesetz für das Land NRW), dated February 15, 2005 (GV. NRW. S. 102).
   Google Scholar
• NRW School Law (Schulgesetz für das Land NRW), dated February 15, 2005 (GV. NRW. S. 102), changed by amendment, dated June 13, 2006 (GV. NRW. S. 270) and June 27, 2006 (GV. NRW. S. 278).
   Google Scholar
• Paine, T (1791) The rights of man, Penguin, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Reuling, J (2002) ‘Vocational Training and Lifelong Learning in Australia: Observations and Conclusions from a German Perspective’, in Vocational Training and Lifelong Learning in Australia and Germany, eds. G. Burke and J. Reuling, NCVER, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, K (1999a) Independent investigation into the quality of training in Queensland’s traineeship system: final report 2 July 1999. Prepared for Department of Employment, Training and Industrial Relations, DETIR, Brisbane QLD.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, K (1999b) A risky business: Review of the quality of Tasmania’s traineeship system, Office of Vocational Education and Training, Hobart TAS.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, K (2000) Delivering quality: Report of the independent review of the quality of training in Victoria’s apprenticeship and traineeship system, DEET, Canberra ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Selby Smith, C (2005a) Analysis of User Choice resourcing arrangements in March (2004) Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 58.
   Google Scholar
• Selby Smith, C (2005b) User Choice resourcing arrangements in Australia in March (2004) Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 57.
   Google Scholar
• Selby Smith, C, and Ferrier, F (2001) User Choice: The experience since (1998) Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 36.
   Google Scholar
• Selby Smith, J, and Selby Smith, C (1997) Third party access and separation of roles in the implementation of User Choice, Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 12.
   Google Scholar
• Selby Smith, J, Selby Smith, C, and Ferrier, F (1996a) Survey of users in 1996 User Choice pilot projects, Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 7.
   Google Scholar
• Selby Smith, J, Selby Smith, C, and Ferrier, F (1996b) Key policy issues in the implementation of User Choice, Monash University – ACER, CEET working paper 8.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E, and Keating, J (2003) From training reform to training packages, Social Science Press, Tuggerah, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, LR (1999) The impact of User Choice on the Queensland training market: a progress evaluation, DETIR, Brisbane, QLD.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, B (NRW Minister for School and Further Education) (2006) ‚Perspektiven des kaufmänn-ischen Berufskollegs’, Die kaufmännische Schule, 51(5), 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stender, J (2006) Berufsbildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Teil 1: Strukturprobleme und Ordnungsprinzipien des dualen Systems, S. Hirzel, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Twardy, M (2006) ‘Zukunft der Schulbezirke. Stellungnahme von Prof. Martin Twardy am 11. Januar 2006 im Schulausschuss’, Die kaufmännische Schule, 51(3–4), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linde, C. (2006) ‘A new paradigm for evaluating TAFE graduate outcomes’, Inter-national Journal of Training Research, 4(1), 17–29.
   Google Scholar