Personal networks and IT innovation within the Esprit Programme: Some evidence from the UK

References

• Aldrich H and von Glinow M (1992) Personal networks and infrastructure development, in Gibson D et al. (eds) Technopolis Phenomenon, Rowman and Littlefield, NY, 125–45.
   Google Scholar
• Assimakopoulos D and Macdonald S (2002) A Dual Approach to Understanding Information Networks, International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 1, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Assimakopoulos D and Macdonald S (1999) Collaboration and Innovation Networks in Esprit, Prometheus, 17, 299–308.
   Google Scholar
• Assimakopoulos D, Piekkari R and Macdonald S (2000a) ESPRIT: Europe’s Response to US and Japanese Domination in IT, paper presented at the Eighth Schumpeter Conference on ‘Change, Development and Transformation’, CRIC, University of Manchester, Manchester, July.
   Google Scholar
• Assimakopoulos D, Chrissafis A, Gustavsson P, Macdonald S and Marschan-Piekkari R (2000b) Exploiting Informal Information Flow in the 1ST Programme, Final InEsprit (project 29538) Report, Brussels, June.
   Google Scholar
• Badaracco J (1991) The Knowledge Link, Boston MA, Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boisot M (1998) Knowledge Assets, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti S P, Everett M G and Freeman L C (1999) UCINET V, Columbia, Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Burt R (2000) The Network Structure of Social Capital, in Sutton R I and Staw B M (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Burt R (1987) Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence, American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287–1335.
   Google Scholar
• Coles A M, Harris L and Dickson K (2003) Testing Goodwill: Conflict and Cooperation in New Product Development Networks, International Journal of Technology Management, 25, 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman L C (1998) Exploring Social Structure Using Dynamic Three-dimensional Color Images, Social Networks, 20, 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou L (1999) Socio-economic effects of collaborative R&D: European experiences, Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou L et al (1992) The Impact of European Community Policies for Research and Technological Development upon Science and Technology in the UK,Report prepared for DGXII, UKIMPACT, London.
   Google Scholar
• Giusti W and Georghiou L (1988) The use of co-nomination analysis in real-time evaluation of an R&D programme, Scientometrics, 14, 265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J and Schakenraad J (1993) A comparison of private and subsidised R&D partnerships in the European information technology industry, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31, 373–390.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoom J, Link A N and Vonortas N S (2000) Research partnerships, Research Policy, 29, 567–586.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel G, Doz Y and Prahalad C (1989) Collaborate with your competitors — and win, Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb, 133–9.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson B (1998) Personal networks in emerging knowledge-based firms: spatial and functional patterns, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 10, 297–312.
   Google Scholar
• Mytelka L (1995) Dancing with wolves: global oligopolies and strategic partnerships, in Hagedoorn J (ed.) Technical Change and World Economy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 182–204.
   Google Scholar
• Mytelka L and Delapierre M (1987) The alliance strategies of European firms in the information technology industry and the role of Esprit, Journal of Common Market Studies, 26, 231–253.
   Google Scholar
• Narula R (1999) Explaining the growth of strategic R&D alliances by European firms, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37, 711–723.
   Google Scholar
• Narula R and Hagedoom J (1999) Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements, Technovation, 19, 283–294.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn R and Hagedoorn J (1997) The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of inter-organisational alliances and networks, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson J (1991) Technology policy in Europe: Explaining the Framework Programme and Eureka in theory and practice, Journal of Common Market Studies, 29, 269–290.
   Google Scholar
• Piekkari R, Macdonald S and Assimakopoulos D (2001) In bed with a stranger: finding partners for collaboration in Esprit, Science and Public Policy, 28, 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Quintas P and Guy K (1995) Collaborative, pre-competitive R&D and the firm, Research Policy, 24, 325–348.
   Google Scholar
• Ray T (1998) Collaborative research in Japan and the West: A case study of Britain’s response to MITI’s fifth generation computer initiative, in Hemmert M and Oberlander C (eds) Technology and Innovation in Japan, Routledge, London, 151–169.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson D and Presley B (1999) MAGE 5.4, Biochemistry Department, Duke University, Durham NC.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman S and Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar