Public research agencies as sources for innovations and the entrepreneurial absorptive capacity of manufacturing enterprises

References

• Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis. Canada: John Wiley and Sons. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. (1977). Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arundel, A. (1997). Enterprise Strategies and Barriers to Innovation. In Innovation Measurement and Policies (pp. 101–108). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1998). Innovation in Manufacturing 1996/97 Catalogue No. 8116.0. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and Veugelers, R. (1998). Complementarily between Technology Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms. Economic Working Papers: Department of Economics and Business; Strategic Management Society Meeting Barcelona: Universitet Pompeu Fabra.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. (1995). Empirical Studies of Innovation Activity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M.. & Levinthal D. A. (March 1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. (Technology, Organizations, andInnovation). Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–153.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journal; 99, 569–596.
   Google Scholar
• Cusmano, L. (2000). Technology Policy and Co-operative Rd-D: the role of relational research capacity. DRUID Working Paper No 00–3. Copenhagen: Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• David Paul. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497–529.
   Google Scholar
• DETYA. (2000). Research Expenditure: Selected Higher Education Statistics. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2001). Rol) and Absorptive Capacity: Theory and Empirical Evidence. London, Website: Institute of Fiscal Studies. [2002, January].
   Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld, A. (2001). Absorptive Capacity and Strategic R&D Development. Website: Norwegian Institute of International affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Guellec, D., & Pattinson, B. (2001). Innovation Surveys: Lessons from OECD Countries’ Experience. STI Review.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Analysis. Fifth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lankhuizen, M. (1998). Catching Up, Absorption Capability and the Organisation of Human Capital. Maastricht. Website.: Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bas, C., Picard, F., & Suchecki, B. (1998). Network Behaviour and Innovation Success: A Study on Individual Data. Revue D’Economie Politique, 108, 625–644.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation — Introduction. Edited by B.-A.
   Google Scholar
• Lundval. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. What Determines the Linkages of Enterprises with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from CIS2. Montreal: UQAM.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C. (1983). Innovation, Market Structure, and Government Policy in the American Semiconductor Electronics Industry: A Survey. Research Policy, 12, 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (1997) Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD/Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2001) OECD in Figures: Statistics on the Member Countries. Research and Development FY1998 [Web Page]. [2002, January].
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2002) Benchmarking industry—Science Relationships. Paris. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard, M. (2000). Absorptionsfahigkeit der Unternehmen. In U. Schmoch, G. Licht, & M. Reinhard Wissens-und Technologietransfer in Deutschland (pp. 243–258). Stuttgart: Frauenhofer IRB Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schmoch, U., Licht, G., & Reinhard, M. (2000). Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Frauenhofer IRB Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tilton, J. E. (1971). International diffusion of technology: the case of semiconductors. Washington. Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 26, 303–315.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. E. (2000). Logistic Regression. Chapter 7 L. G. Grimm, & P. R. Yarnold (Editors), Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics (pp. 217–244). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yencken et al (2001) Yellow Pages® Special Innovation Report — Medium and Small Enterprises. Pacific Access Pty. Ltd. Melbourne
   Google Scholar
• Yencken, J., & Gillin (2002) Sources of Ideas and Knowledge for Innovatory Small Companies: Disaggregation of Australian and Eurostat CIS2 Innovation Survey Data. Public Research Sources Analysed by Industry Sector and Enterprise Size. Innovation: Management, Theory and Practice 4(1–3):147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Yencken, J., Cole, T. and Gillin, M. (2002). Spin-off Companies from Universities and Other Public Research Agencies in Australia: Preliminary Findings from Early Stage Case Studies. Presented June 2002 at Tenth Conference on High-Tech Small Companies Conference, Enschede, Holland. Twente University.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. and George, G. (2002) Absorptive Capacity: A review Reconceptualisation and Extension. Academy of Management Review 27, 2, 185.
   Google Scholar