Publication Cover
Innovation
Organization & Management
Volume 5, 2003 - Issue 1
78
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technology Transfer Tactics

Cultural challenges to technology transfer

(Chief Scientist)
Pages 66-78 | Received 13 Aug 2003, Accepted 10 Sep 2003, Published online: 17 Dec 2014

References

  • Amend, Stephan and Thora Amend (eds.). 1995. National Parks Without People? The South American Experience. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
  • Angermeier, Paul L. 2000. The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conservation Biology 14(2):373–381.
  • Barnard, A. and J. Spencer. 1998. Encyclopaedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology. Routledge, London.
  • Bodley, John H. 1982. Victims of Progress (second edition). Mayfield Publishing, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Burnham, Philip. 2000. Indian Country, God’s Country: Native Americans and the National Parks. Island Press, Washington D.C.
  • Carr, Kimberly. 1999. Cuban biotechnology treads a lonely path. Nature 398:822–823.
  • Center for Food Safety. 2002. Compilation and Analysis of Public Opinion Polls on Genetically Engineered (GE) Foods. [Online]. [1 p.] Available at http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/facts&issues/polls.html (updated I Feb. 20002; accessed March 2003). The Center for Food Safety, Washington, DC.
  • Coghlan, Andy. 1999. How safe is safe? New Scientist 16 October: 7.
  • Commoner, B. 2002. The Spurious Foundation of Genetic Engineering. Harpers Magazine, February, 2002.
  • Dang, Himraj. 1991. Human Conflict in Conservation. Development Alternatives, New Delhi.
  • Degregori, Thomas R. 2001. Agriculture and Modern Technology: A Defence. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
  • Diamond, Jared. 1998. Guns, Germs, and Steel. Vintage, New York.
  • FAO. 2000. Agriculture: Towards 2015/30. Global Perspective Studies Unit, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • Gadgil, Madhav and Ramachandra Guha. 1993. This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  • Harmon, David. 2002. In Light of Our Differences: How Diversity in Nature and Culture Makes Us Human. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.
  • Kelley, Klara B. and Harris Francis. 1994. Navajo Sacred Places. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
  • Krech, Shepard. 1999. The Ecological Indian: Myth and History. W.W. Norton, New York.
  • Kroeber, A.L. 1948. Anthropology. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York.
  • Laird, Sarah A. (ed.). 2002. Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge: Equitable Partnership in Practice. Earthscan Publications,
  • London.
  • Lemonnier, P. 1993. Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic. Routledge, London.
  • Martin, Graham. 2003. Unbalanced view of a dynamic world. Nature 423:115.
  • McNeely, Jeffrey A. and Paul Wachtel. 1991. Soul of the Tiger: Searching for Nature’s Answers in Southeast Asia. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Mumford, L. 1934. Techniques and Civilization. Routledge, London. Peluso, Nancy Lee. 1992. Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  • Qaim, Martin. 1999. Assessing the impact of banana biotechnology in Kenya. ISAA Briefs 10: 1–38.
  • Roffe, P. and T. Tesfachew. 2003. Revisiting the Technology Transfer Debate: Lessons for the New WTO Working Group. From www.ictsd.org.
  • Sillitoe, Paul. 2000. Let Them Eat Cake: Indigenous Knowledge, Science and the “Poorest of the Poor”. Anthropology Today 16(6): 3–7.
  • Tylor, Edward Burnett. 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom.
  • UCAUSA. 2001. Risks of Genetic Engineering. Fact Sheet. 6p. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA
  • Vitug, Marites Danguilan. 1993. Power From the Forest: The Politics of Logging. Philippine Centre for Investigative Journalism, Manila.
  • Wambugu, Florence. 1999. Why Africa needs agricultural biotech. Nature 400:15–16.
  • Winterhalder, Bruce and Flora Lu. 1997. A forager-resource population ecology model and implications for indigenous conservation. Conservation Biology 11(6):1354–1364.
  • Zwart, Frank de. 2000. Practical knowledge and institutional design in India’s affirmative action policy. Anthropology Today 16(2):4–7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.