How do new technologies emerge? A patent-based analysis of ICT-related new industrial activities

References

• Corrocher, N. and Montobbio, F. (2003), “Analysing the emergence of new industrial activities: some methodological issues”. TENIA Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, N., Monarch, I., and Konda, S. (1998), “Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), pp.1206–1223.
   Google Scholar
• Courtial, J.P. (1994), “A coword analysis of scientometrics”, Scientometrics 31(3), pp.251–260.
   Google Scholar
• Courtial, J.P., Callon, M. and Sigogneau, A. (1993), “The use of patent titles for identifying the topics of invention and forecasting trends”, Scientometrics, 26(2), pp.231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1980), “Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity”, Economic Journal, 90(358), pp 266–293.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. (1996), “Innovation in Large Technical Systems: The Case of Telecommunications”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5(4), pp.1143–1180.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G.C., and Foo, S. (2000), “Bibliography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis”, Information Processing and Management, 37, pp.817–842.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnberg, E. and Jacobsson, S. (1997), “Technological Discontinuities and Incumbents’ Performance: An Analytical Framework”, in Edquist, C. (ed.) Systems of Innovation - Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. Pinter, London.
   Google Scholar
• Fai, F. and von Tunzelmann, N. (2001), “Industry-specific competencies and converging technological systems: evidence from patents”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 12, pp.141–170.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, M., Miyazaki, K. and von Tunzelmann, N. (2000), “Technological fusion and telemedicine in Japanese companies”, Technovation, 20, pp.169–187.
   Google Scholar
• Gort, M. and Klepper, S. (1982), “Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations”, The Economic Journal, 92, pp. 630–653.
   Google Scholar
• Granstrand, 0., Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1997), “Multitechnology corporations: whey they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competencies”, California Management Review, 39, pp.8–25.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M. and Elhanan, H. (1991), “Quality Ladders and Product Cycles”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 557–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hall B.H. (2000), “A Note on the Bias in the Herfindahl Based on Count Data”. Mimeo. UC Berkeley and Nuffield College, Oxford. http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/hhibias.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hall B.H., Jaffe, A.B., and Trajtenberg M. (2000), “Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look”. NBER Working Paper No. 7741.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., and Fogarty M.S. (2000), “The Meaning of Patent Citations: Report on the NBER/Case-Western reserve survey of Patentees”. NBER Working paper series n 7361.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg, M., and Henderson, R. (1993), “Geographic Localisation of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, pp.577–598
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (1996), “Entry, Exit, Growth and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle”, American Economic Review, 86,3, pp. 562–583.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (1997), “Industry Life Cycles”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 6 (1), pp.145–181.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. and Graddy, E. (1990), “The Evolution of New Industries and the Determinants of Market Structure”, RAND Journal of Economics, v. 21(1), pp. 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama, F. (1992), “Technology Fusion and The New R&D”, Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp. 70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Koumpis, K. and Pavitt, K. (1999), “Corporate Activities in Speech Recognition and Natural Language: Another ‘New-Science’-Based Technology”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 3(3), pp. 335–366.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1979), “A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income”, Journal of Political Economy, 87 (21), pp. 253–66.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1995), “Technical Change in International Trade”, in Stoneman, P. (ed.) Handbook of the Economic of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 342–365.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdi, S. and Pavitt, K. (1997), “Key National Factors in the Emergence of Computational Chemistry Firms”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 1(4), pp.355–386.
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2002) “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”, Research Policy, 31(2), pp. 247–264.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R. and Steinmueller, W.E. (2000), Mobilizing the Information Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, S. (1998), Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, London
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, K. (1994), “Search, Learning and Accumulation of Technological Competences: The Case of Optoelectronics”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), pp.631–654.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S. (1982), An evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press, Cambridge (Mass).
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R. (1994), “The Co-evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure and Supporting Institutions”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), pp.47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993) National Innovations Systems: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Noyons, E.C.M. and van Raan, A.F.J. (1998), “Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: self-organised structuring to map neural network research”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(1), pp.68–81.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1997), “The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety”, Research Policy, 36, pp.141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Pistorious, C.W.I. and Utterback, J.M. (1997), “Multi-mode interaction among technologies”, Research Policy, 26, pp.67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Rikken, P., Jiers, H.A.L., and Vos, R. (1995), “Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL”, Scientometrics, 33(3), pp.367–380.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. (1995), “Introduction of New Technology: Making Use of Recent Insights from Sociology and Economics of Technology”, Technology Analysis 6- Strategic Management, 7(4), pp.417–431.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. (1976), Perspectives on technology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M (1990), “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations”, Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), pp. 172–187
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M.L. and Anderson, P. (1986), “Technological Discontinuities and Organisational Environment”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, pp.439–465.
   Google Scholar
• Utterback, J. M. (1994), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Ende, J. and Kemp, R. (1999), “Technological transformations in history: how the computer regime grew out of existing computing regimes”, Research Policy, 28, pp. 833–851.
   Google Scholar
• Van Raan, A.F.J. and Tijssen, R.J.W. (1993), “The neural net of neural network
   Google Scholar
• research”, Scientometrics, 26(1), pp-169–192.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 2, pp. 190–207.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. (1979), “The Product Life Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4), pp 255–67
   Google Scholar
• Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., Armstrong J. (1994), “Intellectual capital and the firm: the technology of geographically localized knowledge spillovers”. NBER Working Paper No. 4946, December.
   Google Scholar