Online Dispute Resolution and Family Disputes

References

• Altobelli, T. (2003). Family law in Australia – Principles and practice. Chatswood, New south Wales: LexisNexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Astor, H. & Chinkin, C. (2002). Dispute resolution in Australia (2nd ed.). Sydney: LexisNexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Attorney-General’s Department (2006). Family Relationship Centres. Retrieved August 6, 2006 from http://www.familyrelationships.gov.au/Family_Relationship_Centres.html
   Google Scholar
• Bellucci, E., & Zeleznikow, J. (2005). Trade-off manipulations in the development of negotiation decision support systems. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh,. & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/bellucci_zeleznikow.htm
   Google Scholar
• Boulle, L. (2005). Mediation: Principles, process, practice. Sydney: LexisNexis Butterworths
   Google Scholar
• Brannigan, C. (2004). Beyond E-Commerce: Expanding the potential of online dispute resolution. Interaction, March, 15–17. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.crnetwork.ca/magazine/include/BeyondE-Commerce.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Center for Law, Commerce & Technology (2000). Online alternative dispute resolution: An issues primer. Prepared for the National Association of Attorneys General. Center for Law, Commerce & Technology at the University of Washington School of Law. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from www.law.washington.edu.lct/publications.html#odr
   Google Scholar
• Cho, G.(2002, September). E-DR: Will it work and what are the barriers? Paper presented to the 6th National Mediation Conference: Pathways Towards Dispute Management, Canberra, ACT, Commonwealth of Australia. Commonwealth of Australia. (1975). Family Law Act of 1975. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Conley Tyler, M., & Bretherton, D. (2003) Research into online alternative dispute resolution: Exploration report prepared for the Department of Justice, Victoria. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://citdr.org/gsdl/collect/onlinedi/index/assoc/HASH01c0/d0f72324.dir/doc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conley Tyler, M., Bretherton, D., & Bastian, B. (2003). Research into online alternative dispute resolution: Needs assessment. Prepared for the Department of Justice, Victoria. International Conflict Resolution Centre, University of Melbourne. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/papers.php
   Google Scholar
• Conley Tyler, M. (2005). 115 and counting: The state of ODR 2004. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. International Conflict Resolution Centre in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2004. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/ConleyTyler.htm
   Google Scholar
• Conley Tyler, M., & Allen, E. (2005). Online dispute resolution library index. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/Cyberweek2005/odrlibraryindex.htm
   Google Scholar
• Conley Tyler, M. (2006, March). Evaluating recent developments in online dispute resolution. Paper presented at the Fourth International Forum on ODR, Cairo, Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Conley Tyler, M., & Raines, S. S. (2006). The human face of online dispute resolution. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 23(3), 333–342.
   Google Scholar
• Conley Tyler, M., & Bornstein, J. (2006). Accreditation of online dispute resolution practitioners. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 23(3), 383–404.
   Google Scholar
• Consumers International. (2001). Disputes in cyberspace 2001: Update of online dispute resolution for consumers in cross-border disputes. Consumers International Office for Developed and Transition Economies, London.
   Google Scholar
• DeSteven, D., & Helie, J. (2000). Online dispute resolution: Implications for the ADR profession. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from www.mediate.com/articles/helie1.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Eisen, J. (1998). Are we ready for mediation in cyberspace? Brigham Young University Law Review, 1305–1358.
   Google Scholar
• Femenia, N. (2000). ODR and the global management of customers’ complaints: How could ODR techniques be responsive to different social and cultural environments? Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.mediate.com/articles/femenia.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, L., & Brandon, M. (2002). Mediating with families. Frenchs Forest, New South Wales: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, L. J., Kennedy, R. M., & Gibbs J. (2002). Frontiers of law: The internet and cyberspace: Cyber-mediation: Computer-mediated communications: Medium massaging the message. New Mexico Law Review, 32, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, A. G. (2003) How do you write ‘Yes’?: A study on the effectiveness of online dispute resolution. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 20(3), 261–286.
   Google Scholar
• Hattotuwa, S. Y (2005). Untying the Gordian Knot: ICT for conflict transformation and peacebuilding. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/Hattotuwa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hattotuwa, S., & Conley Tyler, M. (2006). Online dispute resolution: An Asia Pacific perspective. Asian Journal on Mediation, 1, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Helie, J. (Ed.). (2006). ODR Section. Retrieved August 13, 20026 from www.mediate.com
   Google Scholar
• International Chamber of Commerce. (2002, May). Business-to-Consumer and Consumer-to-Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Inventory Project. (Summary Report). Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Katsh, E. (1996). Online dispute resolution: Building institutions in cyberspace. University of Connecticut Law Review, 28, 953–980. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.umass.edu/legal/articles/uconn.html
   Google Scholar
• Katsh, E., & Rifkin, J. (2001). Online dispute resolution: Resolving conflicts in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Katsh, E. (2004). Bringing online dispute resolution to virtual worlds: Creating processes through code. New York Law School Law Review, 49, 1101–1121. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.nyls.edu/pdfs/v49n1p271-291.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Katsh, E., Rifkin, J., & Gaitenby, A. (2000). E-commerce, E-disputes, and E-dispute resolution: In the shadow of “eBay Law”. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 15, 705.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann-Kohler, G., & Schultz, T. (2004). Online dispute resolution: Challenges for contemporary justice. The Hague: Kluwer Law International and Schulthess.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, G. E. (2005). E-negotiation systems: Interaction of people and technologies to resolve conflicts. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://interneg.concordia.ca/interneg/research/papers/2004/08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Larson, D. (2003). Online dispute resolution: Do you know where your children are? Negotiation Journal 20(3), 199–205.
   Google Scholar
• Law, S. F., & Leonard, D. (2005). Language, culture and online dispute resolution. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/law_leonard.htm McIntosh, J. (2003).Enduring conflict in parental separation: Pathways of impact on chid development. Journal of Family Studies, 9(1), 63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Melamed, J. (2002). Divorce mediation and the Internet. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.mediate.com/articles/melamed9.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, L., Fisher, T. (2003). Why a focus on children? Why now? Journal of Family Studies, 9(1), 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council (NADRAC). (2001a). A framework for ADR standards. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council (NADRAC) (2001b). Online ADR: Background Paper. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.nadrac.gov.au/www/disputeresolutionHome.nsf/0/ 954039C8FD1147B6CA256B4C0004A6AB?OpenDocument
   Google Scholar
• National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council. (NADRAC) (2002). Dispute resolution and information technology: Principles for good practice (Draft). Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.nadrac.gov.au/adr/DisputeResolutionInformationTechnology.htm
   Google Scholar
• Parlade, C. V. (2003). Challenges to ODR implementation in a developing country. In E. Katsh & D. Choi, (Eds.), Online dispute resolution: Technology as the “Fourth Party”. Proceedings of the UNECE Second Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. UNECE. Center for Information Technology and Dispute Resolution, University of Massachusetts. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unece2003/pdf/parlade.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Primerano, F. (2005). Multicultural Australia, information technology and online dispute resolution. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/Primerano.HTM
   Google Scholar
• Pyser, S. N., & Figallo, C. (2004). The ‘Listening to the City’ online dialogues experience: The impact of the full value contract. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 21, 381–393.
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S. (2004, July). Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Raines, S. (2005). The practice of mediation online: Techniques to use or avoid when mediating in cyberspace. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/raines.htm
   Google Scholar
• Raines, S. (2006). Mediating in your pajamas: The benefits and challenges for ODR practitioners. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 23(3), 359–369.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, S. (2005). The cultural vacuum in online dispute resolution. In In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/rao.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rule, C. (2000). New mediator capabilities in online dispute resolution. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.mediate.com/articles/rule.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Rule, C. (2002). Online dispute resolution for business: For Ecommerce, B2B, consumer ,employment, insurance, and other commercial conflicts. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, T., Kaufmann-Kohler, G., Langer, D., & Bonnet, V. (2001). Online dispute resolution: State of the art, issues, and perspectives. Report of the E-Com Research Project of the University of Geneva. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.online-adr.org/reports/TheBlueBook-2001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sourdin, T. (2005a). Alternative dispute resolution. Pyrmont, New South Wales: Lawbook.
   Google Scholar
• Sourdin, T. (2005b). ODR - An Australian perspective on the digital divide” In In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/
   Google Scholar
• Stonestreet, J.P. (2003). How the web can help children of divorce (and their parents...). Mediate.com. Retrieved 6 August, 2006, from http://www.mediate.com/articles/stonestreetJP1.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Strategic Partners Pty Ltd. (1998). Child inclusive practice in family and child counselling and family and child mediation. Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. Retrieved August 6, 2006, from http://www.facsia.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/aboutfacs/programs/families-CIPcontents.htm
   Google Scholar
• Syme, D. (2006). Keeping pace: On-line technology and ADR services. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 23(3), 342–357.
   Google Scholar
• Tamberlin, B. (2005). Online dispute resolution and the courts. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/tamberlin.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tan, J., Bretherton, D. & Kennedy, G. (2005). Negotiating online. In In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/
   Google Scholar
• The Economist (2006, March 11). March of the Robolawyers, pp. 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Thiessen, E., & and Zeleznikow, J. (2005). Technical aspects of ODR: Challenges and opportunities. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/thiessen_zeleznikow.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wahab, M. (2005). Online dispute resolution and digital inclusion: Challenging the global digital divide. In M. Conley Tyler, E. Katsh, & D. Choi, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Annual Forum on Online Dispute Resolution. The International Conflict Resolution Centre, The University of Melbourne in collaboration with the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.odr.info/unforum2004/
   Google Scholar
• Zeleznikow, J., & Bellucci, E. (2004). Building negotiation support systems by integrating game theory and heuristics. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://dsslab.sims.monash.edu.au/dss2004/proceedings/pdf/85_Zeleznikow_Bellucci.pdf#search=%22%22building%20negotiation%20support%20systems%22%22
   Google Scholar
• Zeleznikow, J., & Bellucci, E. (2005). Family_Winner: Integrating game theory and heuristics to provide negotiation support. Retrieved August 6, 2006 from http://www.jurix.nl/pdf/j03-03.pdf
   Google Scholar