Family Mediation and Women’s Services: Towards Effective Referral

References

• Abrahams, P. (1986). Violence against the Family Court: Its roots in domestic violence. Australian Journal of Family Law, 1(1), 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, A., & Bickerdike, A. (2005). Family violence and family mediation. DVIRC Quarterly, 1(Summer), 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, C., & Sales, B. (2000). A critical reappraisal of divorce mediation research and policy, Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6(4), 989–1056.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerdike, A. (2005, November). Mediation and family violence. Paper presented to the Safe Transitions Conference, Sydney
   Google Scholar
• Bordow, S., & Gibson, J. (1994). Evaluation of the Family Court mediation service. Sydney, Family Court of Australia, Research Report No 12.
   Google Scholar
• Botttomley, A. (1985). What is happening to family law? A feminist critique of conciliation. In J. Brophy & C. Smart, (Eds), Women in law: Explorations in law, family and sexuality (pp. 162–189). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• DePorto, D., & Miller, J. (2005). Honouring the victim’s voice. ACResolution, Summer, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, L. (1986). Establishing an alternative dispute resolution project with a community based philosophy. In J. Mugford, (Ed.), Alternative dispute resolution (pp. 250–276). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology Seminar, No. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, R., Laumann-Billings, L., Waldron, M., Sbarra, D., & Dillon, P. (2001). Twelve year follow up of mediated and litigated child custody disputes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 323–332.
   Google Scholar
• Family Law Council. (1983). Report to the Attorney General in respect to family law centres. Family Relationship Centres. (2005). available at http//www.ag.gov.au/family
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, L., Horwood, J., & Ridder, E. (2005a). Partner violence and mental health outcomes in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1103–1119.
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson, L., Horwood, J., & Ridder, E. (2005b). Rejoinder. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1131–1136.
   Google Scholar
• Girdner, L. (1990). Mediation triage: Screening for spouse abuse in divorce mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 7(4), 365–376.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, E. (1986). Dispute resolution family law: Is “conciliatry procedure” the answer? Australian Journal of Family Law, 1(1), 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, K., & Roberts, G. (1998), How common is domestic violence against women? The definition of partner abuse in prevalence studies. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 22(1), 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2005). Domestic violence: It’s not about gender – or is it? Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1126–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. (2004). Family mediation research: Is there empirical support for the field? Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22(1–2), 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B. (1996). A decade of divorce mediation research: Some answers and questions. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 34, 373–385.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., & Duryee, M. (1992). Women’s and men’s view of mediation in voluntary and mandatory settings. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 30, 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Keys Young. (1996). Research/evaluation of family mediation practice and the issue of violence. (Final Report). Canberra: Legal Aid and Family Services.
   Google Scholar
• Kressel, K. (1985). The process of divorce. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, M. (1987). The politics of compromise: A feminist perspective on mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 4 , 14.
   Google Scholar
• Love, T., Moloney, L., & Fisher, T. (1995). Federally-funded family mediation in Melbourne. Canberra: CPN Publications.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, H. (1998). What’s in a name? Definitions and domestic violence. Melbourne, Victoria: Domestic Violence and Incest Resource Centre. (Research Report No 1).
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J., & Long, C. (2006). Children beyond dispute: A prospective study of outcomes from child focused and child inclusive post separation family dispute resolution. Canberra: Commonwealth Attorney General’s Department.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J., & Moloney, L. (2002). Child inclusive primary dispute resolution: Clinical demonstrations. Melbourne, Victoria: Centre for Online and Media Educational Technologies, La Trobe University, Australian Institute for Primary Care.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J., & Moloney, L. (2006). Child focused dialogues. Melbourne, Victoria: Centre for Online and Media Educational Technologies, La Trobe University, Australian Institute for Primary Care.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, A. (2004). Mediation and domestic abuse. In J. Folberg, A. Milne, & P. Salem, (Eds.), Divorce and family mediation (pp. 304–335). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, L. (2006). Child sensitive practices in family law disputes. Are we finally beginning to get it right? In B. Smyth, N. Richardson, & G. Suriano, (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Forum on Family Relationships in Transition (pp. 116136). Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, L., Fisher, T., Love, A., & Ferguson, S. (1996). Managing difference: Federally-funded family mediation in Sydney. Canberra: CPN Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, L., T, Love, A. Fisher, & Ferguson, S. (1996). The words to say it: Clients’ own experiences of family mediation. Australian Journal of Family Law, 10(1), 53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, L., & McIntosh, J, (2006). Child focused dialogues: Clinical and theoretical underpinnings. Melbourne, Victoria: La Trobe University, Australian Institute for Primary Care.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, P. (2006). Keeping in contact: The role of Family Relationship Centres in Australia. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 18(2), 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, P. (1995). Custody, access and domestic violence. Australian Journal of Family Law, 9(1), 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J. (1997). Mediating when domestic violence is a factor: Policies and practice in court-based divorce mediation programs. Mediation Quarterly, 14(4), 319–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pinzon, L. (1996). The production of power and knowledge in mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 14, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. (1984). Mediation from a feminist perspective: Promise and problems. Law and Inequality, 21(2), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M., & Gee, T. (2003). Mediation, conciliation and high conflict families: Dialogue with a dead horse. Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, 14(4), 266–279.
   Google Scholar
• Saposnek, D. (2004). Commentary: The future of the history of family mediation research. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22(1–2), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Scutt, J. (1983). Even in the best of homes: Violence in the family. Ringwood, Victoria: Pelican Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scutt, J. (1980). Introduction. In J. Scutt (Ed.), Violence in the family: A collection of conference papers (pp. ix – xvi). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Scutt, J. (1983). Even in the best homes: Violence in the family. Ringwood, Victoria: Pelican Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scutt, J. (1986). The privatisation of justice: Power differentials, inequality and the palliative of counselling and mediation. In J. Mugford (Ed.), Alternative dispute resolution: Proceedings of the Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, Australia, 15, 185–212.
   Google Scholar