202
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Feelings About Housework: Understanding Gender Differences

Pages 141-159 | Published online: 17 Dec 2014

References

  • Allen, S, M., & Hawkins, A. J. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers’ beliefs and behaviours that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 199–212.
  • Baxter, J. (1993). Work at Home:The domestic division of labour. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
  • Baxter, J. (2000). The joys and justice of housework. Sociology, 34, 609–631.
  • Benjamin, O. (1998). Therapeutic discourse, power and change: Emotion and negotiations in marital conversations. Sociology, 32, 771–793.
  • Benjamin, O., & Sullivan, O. (1996). The importance of difference: Conceptualising increased flexibility in gender relations at home. Sociological Review, 44, 794–820.
  • Berheide, C.W (1984). Women’s work in the home: Seems like old times. In B. Hess & M.Sussman (Eds.), Women and the family:Two decades of change (pp.37–55). NewYork: Haworth Press.
  • Berk, S. E (1985). The gender factory. The apportionment of work in American households. NewYork: Plenum.
  • Bernard, J. (1976). The future of marriage. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Bittman, M. (1991). Juggling time. (Report for the Office of the Status of Women). Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
  • Bittman, M. (1995). Recent changes in unpaid work. (Occasional Paper, Catalogue No. 4154.0). Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra: Australian Commonwealth Government Printer.
  • Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework & ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570–81.
  • Bryson, L. (1985). Gender divisions and power relationships in the Australian family. In P. Close & R. Collins (Eds.), Family and economy in modern society (pp. 83–100). London: Macmillan.
  • DeMaris, A., & Longmore, M. A. (1996). Ideology, power and equity: Testing competing explanations for the perception of fairness in household labor. Social Forces, 74, 1043–1071.
  • Demo, D. H., & Acock, A. C. (1993). Family diversity and the division of domestic labor: How much have things really changed? Family Relations, 42, 323–31.
  • Dempsey, K. (1997a). Inequalities in marriage: Australia and beyond. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • Dempsey, K. (1997b).Trying to get husbands to do more work at home. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 33, 216–225.
  • Dempsey, K. (1992). A man’s town: Inequality between women and men in rural Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • Dempsey, K. C. (1999). Attempting to explain women’s perceptions of the fairness of the division of housework. Journal of Family Studies, 5, 3–24.
  • Dempsey, K. C. (2000). Men and women’s power relationships and the persisting inequitable division of housework. Journal of Family Studies, 6, 7–24.
  • DeVault, M. L. (1990) Conflict over housework: A problem that (still) has no name. In L. Kriesberg (Ed.) Research in social movements, conflict, and change (pp. 189–202). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ferree, M. (1976). Working-class jobs: Housework and paid work as sources of satisfaction. Social Problems, 23, 431–441.
  • Ferree, M. (1980). Satisfaction with housework: The social context. In S. Berk (Ed.), Women and household labor (pp.89–112). Beverly Hills/London: Sage.
  • Ferree, M. (1987). The struggles of superwoman. In C. Bose, R. Feldberg, & Skoloff, N. (Eds.), Hidden aspects of women’s work (pp.161–180). NewYork: Praeger.
  • Goodnow, J.J., & Bowes, J. M. (1994). Men, women and household work. Melbourne, Oxford University Press.
  • Greenstein, T. (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74, 1029–1042.
  • Haavind, H. (1984). Love and power in marriage. In H. Holter (Ed.), Patriarchy in a welfare state (pp. 136–167). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  • Hakim, C. (1991) Grateful slaves and self-made women: Fact and fantasy in women’s work orientation. European Sociological Review, 7, 101–121.
  • Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. NewYork:Viking.
  • Imray, L., & Middleton, A. (1983). Public and private: Marking the boundaries. In E. Gamarnikow, D. H.J. Morgan, J. Purvis & D.Taylorson (Eds.), The public and the private (pp. 12–27). London: Heinemann.
  • James, N. (1989). Emotional labour: Skill and work in the social regulation of feelings. Sociological Review, 37, 15–42.
  • Jones, F. L., & Davis, P. (1986). Models of society. London: Croom Helm.
  • Kane, E. W., & Sanchez, L. (1994). Family status and criticism of gender inequality at home and at work. Social Forces, 72, 1079–102.
  • Komter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender and Society, 3, 187–216.
  • Lynch, K. (1989). Solidary labour: Its nature and marginalisation. Sociological Review, 37, 1–14.
  • McMahon, A. (1999). Taking care of men: Sexual politics in the public mind. Melbourne, Victoria: Cambridge University Press.
  • McRae, S. (1986). Cross-class families: A study of wives’ occupational superiority. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Oakley, A. (1974). The sociology of housework. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
  • Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (1998). Back to the basics:Trends in and role determinants of women’s attitudes toward housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 205–218.
  • Shaw, S. M. (1988). Gender differences in the definition and perception of household labor. Family Relations, 37, 333–337.
  • Sullivan, O. (2000). The division of domestic labour: Twenty years of change? Sociology, 34, 437–456.
  • Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.