22
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Where and how family members spend time at home: A quantitative analysis of observational tracking of everyday lives of Italian families

&
Pages 113-129 | Received 30 Jun 2009, Accepted 24 Feb 2010, Published online: 17 Dec 2014

References

  • Arcidiacono, F. (2009). Conflitti verbali in famiglie con preadolescenti: Modelli di analisi in chiave conversazionale. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 36(4), 821–841.
  • Arcidiacono, F., & De Gregorio, E. (2008). Methodological thinking in psychology: Starting from mixed methods. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 2(1), 118–126.
  • Arcidiacono, F., & Pontecorvo, C. (2004). Più metodi per la pluridimensionalità della vita familiare. Ricerche di Psicologia, 27(3), 103–118.
  • Arcidiacono, F., & Pontecorvo, C. (2009). Verbal conflicts as a cultural practice in Italian family interactions between parents and preadolescents, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 97–117.
  • Arnold, J. E., & Graesch, A. P. (2002). Space, time and activities in the everyday lives of working families: An ethnoarchaeological approach. CELF Working Paper 2, Los Angeles: UCLA.
  • Berglund-Lake, H. (2008). Among others in a world of one’s own. Appropriation of space in modern apartment houses in the early post-war period. Folklore, 39, 109–120.
  • Broege, N., Owens, A., Graesch, A. P., Arnold, J. E., & Schneider, B. (2007). Calibrating measures of family activities between largeand small-scale data sets. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 119–149.
  • Callister, P. (2004). Time-use data and work-life policy development. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 22, 108–118.
  • Campos, B., Graesch, A. P., Repetti, R., Bradbury, T., & Ochs, E. (2009). Opportunity for interaction? A naturalistic observation study of dual- earner families after work and school. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 798–807.
  • Caper, L., & Bianchi, S. M. (2002). Continuity and change in the American family. New York: Sage.
  • Christensen, P. (2002). Why more ‘quality time’ is not on the top of children’s lists: The ‘qualities of time’ for children. Children & Society, 16, 77–88.
  • Christensen, P., James, A., & Jenks, C. (2000). Home and movement: Children constructing ‘family time’. In S. L. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning (pp. 139–155). London: Routledge.
  • Colucci, F. P., & Montali, L. (2008). Comparative application of two methodological approaches to the analysis of discourse. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 2(1), 57–70.
  • David, N., & Kramer, C. (2001). Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gershuny, J., & Robinson, J. P. (1988). Historical changes in the household division of labor. Demography, 25, 537–552.
  • Giorgi, S., Padiglione, V., & Pontecorvo, C. (2007). Appropriations: Dynamics of domestic space negotiations in Italian middle-class working families. Culture & Psychology, 13(2), 147–178.
  • Graesch, A. P., Broege, N., Arnold, J. E., Owens, A., & Schneider, B. (2006). Family activities, uses of spaces, and emotional well being: A collaborative merging of time diary and ethnoarchaeological data. CELF Working Paper 44. Los Angeles: UCLA.
  • Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and application of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.
  • Greenacre, M. J., & Pardo, R. (2006). Multiple correspondence analysis of subsets of response categories. In M. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.), Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (pp. 197–217). London: Chapman & Hall.
  • Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Holt & Co.
  • Iedema, R., Heath, C., & Juhasz, A. (Eds.). (2009). Using video in social sciences and health research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(3), 1–126.
  • Jacob, E. (1982). Combining ethnographic and quantitative approaches: Suggestions and examples from a study on Puerto Rico. In P. Gilmore & A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education (pp. 124–147). Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  • Jefferson, G. (1985). On the interactional unpackag ing of a ‘gloss’. Language and Society, 14, 435–466.
  • Kremer-Sadlik, T., Fatigante, M., & Fasulo, A. (2008). Discourses on family time: The cultural interpretation of family togetherness in Los Angeles and Rome. Ethos, 36(3), 283–309.
  • Kremer-Sadlik, T., & Paugh, A. (2007). Everyday moments: Finding ‘quality time’ in American working families. Time & Society, 16(2–3), 287–308.
  • Lyra, M. (2007). Commentary: Modeling the dynamics of meaning construction: Appropriation of the home environment. Culture & Psychology, 13(2), 179–188.
  • Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. Sociological Review, 52(1), 62–89.
  • New, R. S., & Richman, A. L. (1996). Maternal beliefs and infant care practices in Italy and the United States. In S. Harkness & C. M. Super (Eds.), Parents’ cultural belief systems: Their origins, expressions, and consequences (pp. 385–404). New York: Guilford.
  • Ochs, E., Graesch, A. P., Mittmann, A., Bradbury, T., & Repetti, R. (2006). Video ethnography and ethnoarchaeological tracking. In M. PittCatsouphes, K. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.), The work-family handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches to research (pp. 387–409). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pontecorvo, C., & Arcidiacono, F. (2007). Famiglie all’italiana. Parlare a tavola. Milan: Cortina.
  • Raven, G. (2006). Methodological reflexivity: Towards evolving methodological frameworks through critical and reflexive deliberations. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 559–569.
  • Schneider, B., & Waite, L. J. (2005). Being together, working apart: Dual-career families and the worklife balance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schor, J. B. (1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.
  • Swan, J., & Cooper, C. (2005). Time, health and the family: What working families want. London: Working Families.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.