An interactive model for facilitating development of literature reviews

References

• American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2007). What makes education research ‘educational’? Educational Researcher, 36, 529–540.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J., & McGee Banks, C. A. (2001). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communicative research. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boice, R. (2000). Advice for new faculty members: Nihil nimus. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to metaanalysis (statistics in practice). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (1992). In pursuit of the PhD. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cesari, J. P. (1990). Thesis and dissertation support groups: A unique service for graduate students. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 375–376.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. (2009). Using Excel to conduct literature reviews. Unpublished manuscript. Huntsville, TX: Sam Houston State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.) (2009a). Research synthesis and metaanalysis: A step-by-step approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.) (2009b). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. (2nd ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dellinger, A. (2005). Validity and the review of the literature. Research in the Schools, 12(2), 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dellinger, A., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 309–332.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2004). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
   Google Scholar
• di Gregorio, S. (2000). Using NVivo for your literature review. Retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.sdgassociates.com/downloads/literature_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dyckman, L. M. (2005, April). Fear of failure and fear of finishing: A case study on the emotional aspects of dissertation proposal research, with thoughts on library instruction and graduate student retention. Paper presented at the ACRL Twelfth National Conference, Minneapolis, MN. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/events/pdf/dyckman05.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Education Sciences Reform Act (Pub. L. No. 107-279) (2002). Retrieved March 25, 2009, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/rschstat/leg/PL107-279.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, B. (2008). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, M., & DeHann, R. L. (2005). Doctoral preparation of scientifically based education researchers. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. (2007). Existing practice is not the template. Educational Researcher, 36, 553–559.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research: Theory, method and applications. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351–379.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Granello, D. H. (2001). Promoting cognitive complexity in graduate written work: Using Bloom’s taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to improve literature reviews. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40, 292–307.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C. M., Robelia, E., & Hughes, J. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 246–259.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2005). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, K. T. (1999). Writing for professional publication: Keys to academic and business success. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 274–294.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2004). The active interview. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 140–161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., Meeker, K., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004, April). Development and use of the Philosophical Beliefs Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsrud, L. K., & Banaria, J. (2004). Doctoral education: National issues with ‘local’ relevance. Educational Perspectives, 37(2), 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A. (2001). Meta-analysis: A primer. Exceptionality, 9, 177–183.
   Google Scholar
• Kracker, J. (2002). Research anxiety and students’ perceptions of research: An experiment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 282–294.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and Information services (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (2007). Information search process. Retrieved July 26, 2008, from http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/∼kuhlthau/information_search_process.htm
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 557–584.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques and a framework for selection for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 587–604.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mellon, C.A. (1986). Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its development. College and Research Libraries, 47, 160–165.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 147–149.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2001). Pub. L. No. 107-110.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M. T., & Leech, N. L. (2009). QDA Miner as a tool for conducting mixed research syntheses. Unpublished manuscript. Sam Houston State University: Huntsville, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M. T., Leech, N. L., Dellinger, A. B., & Jiao. Q. G. (2007, April). Mixed methods + literature reviews = mixed research syntheses: A framework for conducting and writing rigorous, comprehensive, and insightful literature reviews. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daniel, L. G. (2005). Editorial: Evidence-based guidelines for publishing articles in Research in the Schools and beyond. Research in the Schools, 12(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Dickinson, W. B. (2008). Mixed methods analysis and information visualization: Graphical display for effective communication of research results. The Qualitative Report, 13, 204–225. Retrieved April 2, 2009, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-2/ onwuegbuzie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Jiao, Q. G., & Bostick, S. L. (2004). Library anxiety: Theory, research, and applications. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). A call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 114–139.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N., Bustamante, R. M., Combs, J. P., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). Using qualitative analyses to conduct a rigorous literature review. Unpublished manuscript. Sam Houston State University: Huntsville, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005, March 10). A typology of errors and myths perpetuated in educational research textbooks. Current Issues in Education [online], 8(7). Retrieved July 26, 2008, from http://cie.ed.asu/volume8/number7
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2008). Interviewing the interpretive researcher: A method for addressing the crises of representation, legitimation, and praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). Conducting mixed analyses: A general typology. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 1, 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., Leech, N. L., & Collins, K. M. T. (2009). Mixed data analysis: Advanced integration techniques. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 13–33.
   Google Scholar
• Provalis Research. (2004-2009). QDA Miner: Qualitative data analysis software. Montreal, Canada: Author. Retrieved April 2, 2009, from http://www.provalisresearch.com/Documents/ QDAMiner32.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, C. R. (2004). Writing a philosophy statement: An educator’s workbook. Boston: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, C. R., Sloan, K., & Amobi, F. (2007). Three professors’ teaching philosophy of education: Strategies and considerations for undergraduate courses. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2008). NVIVO: Version 8. Reference guide. Doncaster, Victoria, Australia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• RefWorks. (2008). RefWorks [Computer software]. Bethesda, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sire, J. W. (2004). The universe next door: A basic worldview catalog. Downer’s Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2008). What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37, 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002). CIPP evaluation model checklist: Fifth installment of the CIPP model. Kalamazoo, MI: The Evaluation Center. Retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cip- pchecklist.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sue, S. (1991). Ethnicity and culture in psychological research and practice. In J. Goodchilds (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on human diversity in America (pp. 47–85). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Viadero, D. (2004). The skills gap. Education Week, 23(16), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G., Golde, C., Jones, L., Bueschel, A., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Witcher, A., & Travers, P. (1999). Witcher-Travers Survey of Educational Beliefs. Retrieved July 27, 2008, from http://www.abacon.com/witchertravers
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar