An evaluation study using a mixed methods approach: Diabetes service redesign

References

• Borkan, J. M. (2004). Mixed methods studies: A foun-dation for primary care research. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, P. J., & Wood, M. J. (2001). Basic steps in planning nursing research: From question to proposal (5th ed.). Mississauga, ON, Canada: Jones and Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. (2001). Evaluation research in nursing and healthcare. Nurse Researcher, 8, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., & Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2003). Quality and outcomes framework. London, England: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., Dowswell, G., & Wright, J. (2002). Practice nurses and clinical guidelines in a changing primary care context: An empirical study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 39(3), 299–307.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, R., Paul, S. K., Bethel, M. A., Matthews, D. R., & Neil, H. A. W. (2008). 10-year follow up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 1599–1589.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., & Wright, L. (1993). Short form 36 (SF 36) health survey questionnaire: Normative data for adults of working age. British Medical Journal, 306, 1437–1440.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, K., Ong, B. N., & Croft, P. (1998). Mastering statistics. Cheltenham, England: Stanley Thornes Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Larne, A. C., & Pugh, J. A. (1998). Attitudes of primary care providers toward diabetes: Barriers to guideline implementation. Diabetes Care, 21, 1391–1396.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, G., Inverarity, K., & McDowell, J. (2011). Quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes in relation to deprivation, gender and age in a new community-based model of care. Nursing Research in Practice, article ID 613589 (online); doi: 10.1155/2011/613589.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, G., McDowell, J., & McPhail, K. (2006). An evaluation of the impact of the Glasgow Diabetes project for healthcare for patients with type 2 diabetes. Glasgow, Scotland: University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, C., & Fisher, M. (2007). Cardiovascular risk reduction. In J. R. S. McDowell, D. M. Matthews, & F. J. Brown (Eds.), Diabetes: A handbook for the primary health care team (pp. 173–193). Edinburgh, Scotland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. R. S., Lindsay, G., & McPhail, K. (2007). Development of a questionnaire to determine professionals’ attitudes to type 2 diabetes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12(4), 365–370.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. R. S., McPhail, K., Halyburton, G., Brown, M., & Lindsay, G. (2009). Perceptions of a service redesign by adults living with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(7), 1432–1441.
   Google Scholar
• McLoone, P. (2004). Carstairs scores for Scottish postcode sectors from the 1991 & 2001 Census. Glasgow, Scotland: MRC Social & Public Health Research Unit, University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Moule, P. , & Goodman, M. (2009). Nursing research: An introduction. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Quality Improvement Scotland. (2008). National overview follow-up report: Diabetes. Edinburgh, Scotland: NHS Quality Improvement Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Parahoo, K. (1997). Nursing research: Principles, process and issues (p. 264). Houndsmill, England: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F. , & Hungler, B. P. (1997). Nursing research: Methods, appraisal and utilization (4th ed., pp. 295–303). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F. , & Hungler, B. P. (1999). Nursing research: Principles and methods (6th ed., pp. 162–165, 181, 200–201). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, W. H., Anderson, B. J., Lohrer, P. A., Welch, G., Jacobson, A. M., Aponte, J. E., et al. (1995). Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care, 18(6), 754–760.
   Google Scholar
• Renders, C. M., Valk, G. D., Griffin, S. J., Wagner, E., van Eijk, J. T, & Assendelft, W. J. J. (2009). Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001481. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001481/abstract;jsessionid=137F913B07EC24D3F3865260134D560B.d02t03
   Google Scholar
• The Scottish Government. (2010). Scottish diabetes action plan: Quality care for diabetes in Scotland. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. (2002). Scottish diabetes framework. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN]. (2001). SIGN 55: Management of diabetes. Edinburgh, Scotland: SIGN.
   Google Scholar
• Stetler, C., Legro, M. W., Wallace, C. M., Bowman, C., Guihan, M., Hagedorn, H., et al. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A. (2009). Are we there yet?: The state of the mixed methods community. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 287–291.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Cresswell, J. W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. (2006). From patient data to medical knowledge: The principles and practice of health informatics (pp. 3–31). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. (1998). Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metfor-min on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet, 352, 854–865.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, A. S., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36: Health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: Nimrod Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J. E., Snyder, M. K., & Wright, W. R. (1976a). Part A: Review of literature, overview of methods and results regarding construction of scales. Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with medical care services (Vol. I, NTIS Publication No. PB 288–329). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J. E., Snyder, M. K., & Wright, W. R. (1976b). Part B: Results regarding scales constructed from the patient satisfaction questionnaire and measures of other health care perceptions. Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with medical care services (Vol. I, NTIS Publication No. PB 288–329). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, G., Weinger, K., Anderson, B., & Polonsky, W. H. (2003). Responsiveness of the problem areas in diabetes questionnaire. Diabetic Medicine, 20(1), 69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, G. W., Jacobson, A. M., & Polonsky, W. H. (1997). The problem areas in diabetic scale: An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care, 20(5), 760–767.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011a). Diabetes programme. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/diabetes/en/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011b). Patients for patient safety – Statement of case. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/patientsafety/patients_for_patient/statement/en/index.html
   Google Scholar