Improving educational and professional standards of public relations professionalism: Towards a mixed methods research approach

References

• Abdullah, Z., & Threadgold, T. (2008). Towards the professionalisation of public relations in Malaysia: Perception management & strategy development. Public Relations Review, 34(3), 285–287.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Bahl, S. (1995). Whither Asian public relations? Media Asia: An Asian Mass Communication Quarterly, 22(3),136–143.
   Google Scholar
• Balnaves, M., & Caputi, P. (2001). Introduction to quantitative research methods: An investigative approach. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., & Gaskell, G. (2000). (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2002). Public relations orientation: Development, empirical testing and implications for managers. Journal of Communication Management, 7(2), 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, G., & Dozier, D. (1990). Using research in public relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (1993). Quantity and quality in social research. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, D. (2000). Research training for social scientists. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, G., Sallot, L., & Weaver-Lariscy, R. (1996). Developing standards of professional performance in public relations. Public Relations Review, 22(1), 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Chay-Nemeth, C. (2009). Becoming professionals: A portrait of public relations in Singapore. In K. Sriramesh & D. Vercic (Eds.), The global public relations hand-book (Revised and expanded edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chen N., & Culbertson, H. M. (2009). Public relations in mainland China: An adolescent with growing pains. In K. Sriramesh & D. Vercic (Eds.), The global public relations handbook. Revised and expanded edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, V. K. (2005, March 11). Modern technology the ideal teaching aid. The Star Retrieved from http://thestar.com.my
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1989). Research methods in education. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. P. (2000). Toward an understanding of the use of academic theories in public relations prac-tice. Public Relations Review, 26(3), 315–326.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. P. (2011). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice (3rd ed). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. P. , & Thorpe, R. (2001). The organisa-tion of external communication disciplines in UK companies: A conceptual and empirical analysis of dimensions and determinants. Journal of Business Communication, 38(4), 413–438.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. (2004). Extending symmetry: Toward a convergence of professionalism, practice & pragmatics in public relations. Journal of Public Relations, 16(2), 185–211.
   Google Scholar
• Daymon, C., & Holloway, I. (2011). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2007). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (3rd ed). London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dozier, D. M., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (1995). Manager’s guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ehling, W. (1992). Public relations education and professionalism. In J. Grunig (Eds.), Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ekachai, D., & Komolsevin, R. (1998). Public relations in Thailand. Public Relations Review, 24(2), 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Elmer, P. (2000). Beyond professionalism: A govern-ment relations model. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 5(4), 190–196.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking data: The articulation of qualitative and quantitative methods in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, A. (1995). How to design surveys. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Freitag, A. L. (2002). Ascending cultural competence potential: Profile of US public relations practitioners. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(3), 207–227.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E. (2000). Collectivism, collaboration, and societal corporatism as core professional values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, J. E., & Grunig, L. A. (2002). Implications of the IABC excellence study for PR education. Journal of Communication Management, 7(1), 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (2009). Public relations in the United States: A generation of maturation. In K. Sriramesh & D. Vercic (Eds.), The global public relations handbook. Revised and expanded edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent public relations and effective organisations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. (2003). Public relations and involvement in strategic decision-making. A seminar paper presented in Professor John Leckenby’s proseminar in advertising and brand communication.
   Google Scholar
• Kruckeberg, D. (1998). The future of public relations education: Some recommendations. Public Relations Review, 24(2), 235–248.
   Google Scholar
• Lages, C., & Simkin, L. (2003). The dynamics of public relations: Key constructs and the drive for profes-sionalism at the practitioners, consultancy and industry levels. European Journal of Marketing, 37(1), 298–328.
   Google Scholar
• L’Etang, J. (1999). Public relations education in Britain: A historical review in the context of professionalisation. Public Relations Review, 25(3), 261–289.
   Google Scholar
• L’Etang, J. (2002). Public relations education in Britain: A review at the outset of the millennium and thoughts for a different research agenda. Journal of Communication Management, 7(1), 43–53.
   Google Scholar
• L’Etang, J. (2003). The myth of the ‘ethical guardian’: An examination of its origins, potency and illusions. Journal of Communication Management, 8(1), 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan (2002). Macmillan English Dictionary. International student edition. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moloney, K. (1999). Public relations: Does the industry need regulating? Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 4(1), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, D., Warnaby, G., & Thame, L. (1996). Tactical publicity or strategic relationship management? An exploratory investigation of the role of public relations in the UK retail sector. European Journal of Marketing, 30(12), 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Motion, J., Leitch, S., & Cliffe, S. (2009). Public relations in Australasia: Friendly rivalry, cultural diversity & global focus. In K. Sriramesh & D. Vercic (Eds.), The global public relations handbook (Revised and expanded edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, B. D., Walker, G. Smith, M. F. , & Creedon, P. J. (1999). Outcomes desired by practitioners and academics. Public Relations Review, 25(1), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, A. (2002). Media freedom in Malaysia: The chal-lenge facing civil society. Media Asia, 29(1), 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Newsom, D., Turk, J. V., & Krugkeberg, D. (2010). This is PR: The realities of public relations (11th edition). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2002). SPSS survival manual. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panol, Z. S. (2000). Philippine public relations: An industry and practitioner profile. Public Relations Review, 26(2), 237–254.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2003). Discrepancy between Korean government and corporate practitioners regarding professional standards in public relations: A co-orientation approach. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(3), 249–275.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M. (2001). The PRSA code of professional standards and member code of ethics: Why they are neither professional nor ethical. Public Relations Quarterly, 46(3), 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkleton, B., Austin, E. W., & Dixon, A. (1999). Orientation in public relations research & campaign evaluation. Journal of Marketing Communication, 5(2), 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rawel, A. (2003). How far do professional associations influence the direction of public relations education? Journal of Communication Management, 7(1), 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sallot, L., Cameron, G., & Weaver-Lariscy, R. (1997). Professional standards in public relations: A survey of educators. Public Relations Review, 23(3), 197–216.
   Google Scholar
• Sallot, L., Cameron, G., & Weaver-Lariscy, R. (1998). Pluralistic ignorance and professional standards: Underestimating professionalism of our peers in public relations. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P. , & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). London, England: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. London, England: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., & Smyth, R. (2000). Australian public relations: Status at the turn of the 21st century. Public Relations Review, 26(4), 387–401.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C., Mersham, G., & Valin, J. (2003). Global protocol on ethics in public relations. Journal of Communication Management, 8(1), 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sriramesh, K. (2002). The dire need for multiculturalism in public relations education: An Asian perspective. Journal of Communication Management, 7(1), 54–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sriramesh, K., & Vercic, D. (2001). International public relations: A framework for future Research. Journal of Communication Management, 6(2), 103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Stacks, D. W., Botan, C., & Turk, J. V. (1999). Perceptions of public relations education. Public Relations Review, 25(1), 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Starck, K., & Kruckeberg, D. (2003). Ethical obligations of public relations in an era of globalisation. Journal of Communication Management, 8(1), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, C. (1999). How important is professionalism in public relations management? Working paper series. RMIT business. Retrieved from http://rmit.edu.au/RDU.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, E., Serini, S, Wright D., & Emig, A. (1998). Trends in public relations roles, 1990–1995. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruler, B. (2000). Communication management in The Netherlands. Public Relations Review, 26(4), 403–423.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruler, B., Verĉiĉ, D., Flodin B., & Buetschi G. (2001). Public relations in Europe: A kaleidoscopic picture. Journal of Communication Management, 6(2), 166–175.
   Google Scholar
• White, J., L’Etang, J., & Moss, D. (2009). The United Kingdom: Advances in practice in a restless kingdom, In K. Sriramesh & D. Vercic (Eds.), The global public relations handbook (Revised and expanded edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M. Y., & Taylor, M. (2003). Public relations in Taiwan: Roles, professionalism & relationship to marketing. Public Relations Review, 29(4), 473–483.
   Google Scholar