Assessing child sexual abuse allegations: An exploratory study on psychological reports

References

• AAVV (2011). Carta di Noto III. Linee guida per l’esame del minore in caso di abuso. Rome, Italy: Istituto Superiore Internazionale di Scienze Criminali (ISISC).
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (1997). Practice parameters for the forensic evaluation of children and adolescents who may have been physically or sexually abused. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 423–442.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2008). Software tools and the development of multiple and mixed methods research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 2(1), 127–131.
   Google Scholar
• Blackshaw, S., Chandarana, P. , Garneau, Y., Merskey, H., & Moscarello, R. (1996). Adult recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 305–306.
   Google Scholar
• Bruck, M. (1999). A summary of an affidavit prepared for commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Cheryl Amirault LeFave. Applied Developmental Science, 3(2), 110–127.
   Google Scholar
• Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Hembrooke, H. (1998). Reliability and credibility of young children’s reports: From research to policy and practice. American Psychologist, 53, 136–151.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarolanza, C., & De Gregorio, E. (2007). L’Analisi dei Processi Psicosociali. Lavorare con Atlas-ti. Rome, Italy: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Dammeyer, M. D. (1998). The assessment of child sexual abuse allegations: Using research to guide clinical decision-making. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 1, 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• De Gregorio, E. (2007). Posizionamento Narrativo e Azioni. La ricerca computer-assistita in psicologia sociale della devianza. Rome, Italy: Aracne.
   Google Scholar
• De Gregorio, E., & Mosiello, F. (2004). Tecniche di Ricerca Qualitativa e di Analisi delle Informazioni con Atlas.ti. Rome, Italy: Kappa.
   Google Scholar
• Dèttore, D. (2002). Il parere peritale conclusivo nei casi di minori nei casi di minori presunti vittime di abuso sessuale: Considerazioni e proposte metodologiche. Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 4, 83–116.
   Google Scholar
• Dèttore, D., & Innocenti, I. (2009). La validation: Qualcosa è cambiato? Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 11(2), 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J. (1986). Linking data. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (1992). Combining methods. Lack of methodology: Discussion of Sotirakopoulou & Breakwell. Ongoing Production on Social Representations, 1(1), 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gulotta, G., & Cutica, I. (2009). Guida alla perizia in tema di abuso sessuale e alla sua critica. Milan, Italy: Giuffrè Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Gulotta, G., De Cataldo, L., Pino, S., & Magri, P. (1996). Il bambino come prova negli abusi sessuali. In C. Cabras (a cura di). Psicologia della prova. Milan, Italy: Giuffrè Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, S. (2005). Improving decision making in forensic child sexual abuse evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 87–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse of children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164–180.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K. J., Jaldridge, J., Pearson, S., Stewart, H. L., … Bowler, L. (2009). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances the quality of investigative interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Britanny. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 449–467.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, E. E., & Pinnell, C. M. (1995). Some additional light on the childhood sexual abuse-psychopathology axis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 43, 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• London, K., Bruck, M., Wright, D. B., & Ceci, S. J. (2008). Review of the contemporary literature on how children report sexual abuse to others: Findings, methodological issues, and implications for forensic interviewers. Memory, 16(1), 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Losito, G. (2002). L’analisi del contenuto nella ricerca sociale. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, A. (2008). Investigating child sex abuse allegations: A guide to help legal professionals distinguish valid from invalid claims. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 36, 271–317.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rind, B., Tromovitch, P. , & Bauserman, R. (1998). The validity and appropriateness of methods, analyses, and conclusions in Rind et al. (1998): A rebuttal of victimological critique from Ondersma et al. (2001) and Dallam et al. (2001). Psychological Bulletin, 127, 734–758.
   Google Scholar
• Saywitz, K., & Camparo, L. (1998). Interviewing child witnesses: A developmental perspective. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22, 825–843.
   Google Scholar
• Semin, G., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558–568.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, N. E. (2002). Forensic interviews of children: The components of scientific validity and legal admissibility. Law and Contemporary Problems, 65, 149–178.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., & Quinn, K. M. (1988). Investigatory independence in child sexual abuse evaluations: Conceptual considerations. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 16, 269–278.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. (1981). Qualitative ‘versus’ quantitative methods in social research. In M. Küchler et al. (Eds.), Integration von qualitativen und quantita-tiven Forschungsansätzen. Mannheim, Germany: ZUMA.
   Google Scholar