Outsider, insider, alongsider: Examining reflexivity in hospital-based video research

References

• Adomat, R. and C. Hicks (2003). Measuring nursing workload in intensive care: an observational study using closed circuit video cameras. Journal of Advanced Nursing 42(4): 402-412.
   Google Scholar
• Alsop, R., A. Fitzsimons, and K. Lennon (2002). Theorizing Gender. Cambridge, Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bate, P. and G. Robert (2007). Bringing User Experience to Health Care Improvement: The Concepts, Methods and Practices of Experience- Based Design. Oxford, Radcliffe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, E., J. Engebretson, and Chaimberlain, R. (2006). Photovoice as a Social Process of Critical Consciousness. Qualitative Health Research 16(6): 836-852.
   Google Scholar
• Carmel, S. (2003). Clinical leadership in the intensive care unit. Leading Health Care Organizations. S. Dopson and A. Mark. New York, Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carnevale, F. (2008). Using participant observation in pediatric health care settings: Ethical challenges and solutions. Journal of Child Health Care 12(1): 18-32.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, K. (2009). Unpredictable Predictables: Complexity Theory and the Construction of Order in Intensive Care. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Sydney, University of Technology Sydney. Unpublished PhD.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, K., S. Bridgeford and R. Iedema (2007). Rostered labour and intensive work places: The organisational and industrial relations implications of providing 24 hour care. Our Work … Our Lives: National Conference on Women and Industrial Relations, South Australia, Hawke Research Institute, University of South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, K., R. Iedema and R. Kerridge (2008). Reshaping ICU ward round practices using video-reflexive ethnography. Qualitative Health Research 18(3): 380-390.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, J. (2005). Life and Death in Intensive Care. Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. (2007). Why we cannot know complex things completely. In F. Capra, A. Juarrero, P. Sotolongo and J. van Uden, ‘Reframing Complexity: Perspectives from the North and South’. Mansfield, ISCE Publishing: 81-90.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. and T. de Villiers (2000). The Complex ‘I’. In W. Wheeler, The Political Subject: Essays on the Self from Art, Politics and Science. London, Lawrence & Wishart: 226-245.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. and M. M. Fonow (1990). Knowledge and women’s interests: Issues of epistemology and methodology in feminist sociological research. In J. McCarl Nielson, Feminist Research Methods. Boulder, Westview Press: 69-93.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Sydney, Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Esterberg, K. (2002). Qualitative Methods in Social Research. Boston, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, T., C. May, M. Mort and F. Mair (2006). Telemedicine, Telecare, and the Future Patient: Innovation, Risk and Governance. New Technologies in Health Care. A. Webster. Hampshire, Palgrave MacMillan: 84-96.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2008). ‘Power is not an evil’: rethinking power in participatory methods. Children’s Geographies 6(2): 137-150.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. London, Hutchinson & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, B. (2002). Seeing Health and Illness Worlds – using visual methodologies in a sociology of health and illness: a methodological review. Sociology of Health and Illness 24(6): 856-872.
   Google Scholar
• Held, V. (1993). Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R., R. Forsyth, A. Georgiou, J. Braithwaite, and J. Westbrook. (2007). Video research in health: Visibilizing the normative and affective complexities of computerizing care. Qualitative Research Journal 6(15-30).
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R., R. Forsyth, D. Long, K. Carroll, G. Delaney, S. Jacob, M. Barton, J. Braithwaite, J. Westbrook, B. Lee, and R. Kerridge. (2005). ‘You Have to See it to Believe it: Video as a Tool for Facilitating Reflexive Health Care Practice’. Communication, Medicine and Ethics Conference, 30th June–2nd July Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R., C. Jorm, J. Braithwaite, J. Travaglia, and M. Lum. (2006). A root cause analysis of clinical error: Confronting the disjunction between formal rules and situated clinical activity. Social Science and Medicine 63: 1201-1212.
   Google Scholar
• Iedema, R., D. Long, R. Forsyth, and B. Lee. (2006). Visibilising clinical work: Video ethnography in the contemporary hospital. Health Sociology Review 15(2): 156-168.
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. (2001). Women of Vision. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. (2003). No woman is an object: Realizing the feminist collaborative video. Camera Obscura 54 518(3): 71-97.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J., H. Brake, and K. Steinberg. (2007). Intensivist physician staffing and the process of care in academic medical centres. Quality and Safety in Health Care 16: 329-333.
   Google Scholar
• Kamin, C., R. Deterding, B. Wilson, M. Armacost, and T. Breedon (1999). The Development of a Collaborative Distance learning Program to Facilitate Pediatric Problem-based Learning. Medical Education Online 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Kindon, S. (2003). Participatory video in geographic research: A feminist practice of looking? Area 35(2): 142-153.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R. (1983). How to do what we want to do: Thoughts about feminist methodology. In G. Bowles and R. Klein, Theories of Women’s Studies. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul: 88-104.
   Google Scholar
• Lammer, C. (2007). Bodywork: Social somatic interventions in the operating theatres of invasive radiology. In S. Pink, Visual Interventions. New York, Berghan Books: 91-118.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, H. and N. Casey (1998). Reordering social life: Reflexivity and video methodology. Sociological Research Online 3(2).
   Google Scholar
• Long, D., R. Forsyth, R. Iedema, and K. Carroll. (2006). The (im)possibilities of clinical democracy. Health Sociology Review 15(5): 506-519.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall, D. (1998). Transcultural Cinema. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macrae, C. (2008). Learning from patient safety incidents: Creating participative risk regulation in healthcare. Health, Risk and Society 10(2): 53-67.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual. Durham and London, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merrick, E., R. Iedema, and R. Sorrenson (2008). Exploiting Complexity and Enhancing Adaptability: creating opportunities for communication solutions in health services. Institute of Public Administration Australia (IPAA), National Congress, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Mesman, J. (2007). Disturbing observations as a basis for collaborative research. Science as Culture 16(3): 281-295.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, C. (1974). Film Language. New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. and C. Treitel (1991). Feminist Research Methods. New York, Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2003). The Body Multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham and London, Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naples, N. (1996). A Feminist Revisiting of the Insider/Outsider Debate: The ‘Outsider Phenomenon’ in Rural Iowa. Qualitative Sociology 19(1): 83-106.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. (2006). Social Research Methods. Boston, Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, V. (2000). Feminisms and qualitative research at and into the new millenium. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks CA, Sage: 215-255.
   Google Scholar
• Park-Fuller, L. (2003). Audiencing the audience: Playback theatre, performance writing, and social activism. Text and Performance Quarterly 23(3): 288-310.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London, SAGE
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2001). Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2006). The Future of Visual Anthropology: Engaging the Senses. Oxford, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Introduction. In S. Pink, Visual Interventions. New York, Berghan Books: 2-28.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Ed. (2007). Visual Interventions. New York, Berghan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ramazanoglu, C. (2002). Feminist Methodology. London, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2001). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rouch, J. (2003). The camera and the man. Cine-Ethnography. M. Renov, F. Ginsburg and J. Gaines. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. (1980). Participant Observation. Orlando FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanivich.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, R., R. Burgoyne and S. Flitterman-Lewis (1992). New Vocabularies in Film Semiotics. London and New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waldby, C. (2000). The Visible Human Project: Informatic bodies and posthuman medicine. London and New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A Participatory Action Research Strategy Applied to Women’s Health. Journal of Women’s Health 8(2): 185-192.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. and Y. Redwood-Jones (2001). Photovoice Ethics: Perspectives from Flint Photovoice. Health Education and Behaviour 28(5): 560-572.
   Google Scholar
• Westcott, M. (1990). Feminist Criticism of the Social Sciences. In J. McCarl Nielson, Feminist Research Methods. Boulder, Westview Press: 58-68.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., N. Jones., and F. Richardson., and C. Jones, and P. Richmond (1996). The Nursing Triage Process: a video review and a proposed audit tool. Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine 13: 398-399.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., F. Seagull, J., C. MacKenzie, and K. Klein. (2004). Adaptive leadership in trauma resuscitation teams: a grounded theory approach to video analysis. Cognition, Technology, Work 6: 158-164.
   Google Scholar