Blending qualitative and quantitative analyses in observing interaction: Misunderstandings, applications and proposals

References

• Argyle M (1967) The Psychology of Interpersonal Behavior. Penguin: Armondsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson JM and Drew P (1979) Order in Court. The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. Humanities Press: New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman R (2000) Behavioral observation and coding. In Reis HT and Judd CM(Eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology (pp. 138–159) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman R and Brownlee JR (1980) The strategic use of parallel play: A sequential analysis. Child Development, 51: 873–878.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman R and Gnisci A (2005) Sequential observational methods. In Eid M and Dieneer E (Eds), Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology (pp. 127–140) APA: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman R and Gottman JM (1997) Observing Interaction. An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd edn) Cambridge University Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman R and Quera V (1995a) Log-linear approaches to lag-sequential analysis when consecutive codes may and cannot repeat. Psychological Bulletin, 118: 272–284.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman R and Quera V (1995b) Analyzing Interaction. Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. Cambridge University Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin M (1986) The problem of speech genres. In Emerson C and Holquist M (Eds), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. University of Texas Press: Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Bales RF (1950) Interaction Process Analysis. A method for the study of small groups. Addison- Wesley: Reading, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas JB, Black A, Chovil N and Mullett J (1990) Equivocal Communication Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bearison DJ and Dorval B (with LeBlanc G, Sadow A and Plesa D and Commentary by Stetsenko A) (2001) Collaborative Cognition: Children negotiating ways of knowing. Ablex: Westport, CN.
   Google Scholar
• Billig M (1999) Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in Conversation Analysis. Discourse and Society, 10: 543–558.
   Google Scholar
• Brown P and Levinson SC (1978) Universal in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody E (Ed.) Questions and Politeness (pp. 56–310) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown P and Levinson SC (1987) Politeness: Some universal in language use. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Bull P (1994) On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interview. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13: 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Bull P (2002) Communication Under the Microscope. The theory and the practice of microanalysis. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Bull P (2003) The Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and ambiguity. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Bull P and Elliott J (1998) Level of threat: Means of assessing interviewer toughness and neutrality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17: 220–244.
   Google Scholar
• Bull P and Mayer K (1993) How not to answer questions in political interview. Political Psychology, 4: 651–666.
   Google Scholar
• Bull P, Elliott J, Palmer D and Walker L (1996) Why politicians are three-faced: The face model of political interviews. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 267–284.
   Google Scholar
• Church KW and Helfman JI (1993) Dotplot: A program for exploring self-similarity in millions of lines of text and code. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2: 153–174.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson TL, Fisher KW and Stein Z (2006) Reconsidering qualitative and quantitative research approaches: A cognitive developmental perspective. New Ideas in Psychology, 24: 229–239.
   Google Scholar
• Drew P and Heritage J (1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds) Talk at Work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Eckmann JP, Kamphorst SO and Ruelle D (1987) Recurrence plots of dynamical systems. Europhysics Letters, 5: 973–977.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards D and Potter J (1992) Discursive Psychology. SAGE: London.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards D and Potter J (1993) Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100: 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards D and Potter J (1999) Language and causal attribution: A rejoinder to Schmid and Fiedler. Theory and Psychology 9: 823–836.
   Google Scholar
• Eid M and Diener E (2006) Handbook of Multimethod Measurement in Psychology. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gnisci A (2005) Sequential strategies of accommodation: A new method in courtroom. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44: 621–643.
   Google Scholar
• Gnisci A (2008) Coercive and face-threatening questions to left-wing and right-wing politicians during two Italian broadcasts: Conversational indexes of par condition for democracy systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(5), in press.
   Google Scholar
• Gnisci A and Bakeman R (2007) Sequential accommodation of turn-taking and turn length: A study of courtroom interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9: 234–259.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18: 213–231. Reprinted in (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on face to face behavior (pp. 5–45) Anchor: Garden City, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1971) Relations in Public. Microstudies of the public order. Penguin Press: London.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin C and Duranti A (Eds) (1992) Rethinking Context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman JM (1979) Marital Interaction. Experimental investigations. Academic Press: New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman JM (1983) How children becomes friends. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48(3).
   Google Scholar
• Harré R (1979) Social Being. Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Harré R and Gillett G (1994) The Discursive Mind. Sage: Thousand Oaks CA.
   Google Scholar
• Harré R and Secord P (1972) The Explanation of Social Behavior. Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage J (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Heyns RW and Lippitt R (1954) Systematic observational techniques. In Handbook of Social Psychology. Theory and method (Chap. 10), Vol. 1. Addison-Wesley: London.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs JK, Kawanaba T and Stigler JW (1999) Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 31: 717–724.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G (1984) On the organisation of laughter in talk about troubles. In Atkinson JM and Heritage JC (Eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 347–369) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson G (1985) On the interactional unpackaging of a ‘gloss’. Language and Society, 14: 435– 466.
   Google Scholar
• Jucker J (1986) News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Gieben: Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon A (1982) Organization of behaviour in face to face interaction. In Scherer KR and Ekman P (Eds) Handbook of methods in nonverbal behaviour research, 26: 22–63.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1938) The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Contributions to Psychological Theory, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1944) Constructs in psychology and psychological ecology. University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare 20: 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Linell P, Gustavsson L and Juvonen P (1988) Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of iniziativeresponse analysis. Linguistic, 26: 415.
   Google Scholar
• Mey I (2001) The CA/CDA controversy. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 609–615.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney CG (2000) Theories of Childhood: An Introduction to Dewey, Montessori, Erikson, Piaget and Vygotsky. Redealf: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl P and Turnbull W (1998) Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29: 225–256.
   Google Scholar
• O’Barr WM and Lind EA (1981) Ethnography and experimentation-Partners in legal research. In Sales BD (Ed.) Perspectives in Law and Psychology: The trial process (pp. 181–208) Plenum Press: New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• O’Barr WM (1982) Linguistic Evidence: Language power and strategy in the courtroom. Academic Press: New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Parten MB (1932) Social participation among preschool children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27: 243–269.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä A (2004) Two traditions of interaction research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Psathas G (1995) Conversation Analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Sage: Thousand Oaks CA.
   Google Scholar
• Psathas G and Anderson T (1990) The ‘practices’ of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica, 78: 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Quera V (2008) RAP: A computer program for exploring similarities in behavior sequences using random projections. Behavior Research Methods, 40: 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Quera V, Bakeman R and Gnisci A (2007) Observer agreement for event sequences: Methods and software for sequence alignment and reliability estimates. Behavior Research Methods, 39: 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Reis HT and Judd CM (Eds) (2000) Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Roger DB, Bull PE and Smith S (1988) The development of a comprehensive system for classifying interruptions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7: 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum L (1978) The creation of a behavioral taxonomy. In Sackets GP (Ed.) Observing Behavior (vol. 2): Data collection and analysis methods (pp. 15–24) University Park Press: Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks H, Schegloff E and Jefferson G (1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turntaking for conversation. Language, 4: 696–735.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA (1993) Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26: 99–128.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff EA (1997) Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8: 165–187.
   Google Scholar
• Semin GR and Fiedler K (1988) The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 558–568.
   Google Scholar
• Semin GR and Fiedler K (1991) The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In Stroebe W and Hewstone M (Eds) European Review of Social Psychology, 2: 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Smith ML (1994) Qualitative plus/versus quantitative: The last word. In Reichardt CS and Rallis SF (Eds) The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New perspectives (pp. 37–44) Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PK (1978) A longitudinal study of social participation in preschool children: Solitary and parallel play reexamined. Developmental Psychology, 14: 517–523.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens SS (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103: 677–680.
   Google Scholar