Dynamic capabilities of resource-poor exporters: A study of SMEs in New Zealand

References

• Acedo F.J. and Galán J.L. (2011), ‘Export stimuli revisited: The influence of the characteristics of managerial decision makers on international behaviour’, International Small Business Journal, 29(6), 648–670.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez R.E. (2004), ‘Sources of export success in small- and medium-sized enterprises: The impact of public programs’, International Business Review, 13(3), 383–400.
   Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K. (1995), ‘The influence of new product factors on export propensity and performance: An empirical analysis’, Journal of International Marketing, 3(2), 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Augier M. and Teece D.J. (2007), ‘Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions’, Management International Review, 47(2), 175–192.
   Google Scholar
• Baird I.S., Lyles M.A., and Orris J.B. (1994), ‘The choice of international strategies by small businesses’, Journal of Small Business Management, 32(1), 48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Barney J. (1991), ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Barney J., Wright M., and Ketchen D.J. (2001), ‘The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991ʹ, Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641.
   Google Scholar
• Beamish P.W., Craig R., and McLellan K. (1993), ‘The performance characteristics of Canadian versus U.K. exporters in small and medium sized firms’, Management International Review, 33(2), 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• Beleska-Spasova E., Glaister, K.W., and Stride, C. (2012), ‘Resource determinants of strategy and performance: The case of British exporters’, Journal of World Business, 47(4), 635–647.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham C.B. and Eisenhardt K.M. (2011), ‘Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience’, Strategic Management Journal 32(13), 1437–1464.
   Google Scholar
• Bloodgood J.M., Sapienza H.J., and Almeida J.G. (1996), ‘The internationalization of new highpotential U.S. ventures: Antecedents and outcomes’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4), 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Brouthers L.E., Nakos G., Hadjimarcou J., and Brouthers K.D. (2009), ‘Key factors for successful export performance for small firms’, Journal of International Marketing, 17(3), 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Hunt, C. and Chetty, S. (2011), ‘The binary choice facing SME internationalization’, in: N. Nummela (ed.), International Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises (135-154), New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cao L. (2011), ‘Dynamic capabilities in a turbulent market environment: Empirical evidence from international retailers in China’, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(5), 455–469.
   Google Scholar
• Casillas J.C., Moreno A.M., Acedo F.J., Gallego M.A., and Ramos E. (2009), ‘An integrative model of the role of knowledge in the internationalization process’, Journal of World Business, 44(3), 311–322.
   Google Scholar
• Cavusgil S.T. (1984), ‘Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization’, Journal of Business Research, 12(2), 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Cavusgil S.T. and Zou S. (1994), ‘Marketing strategy-performance relationship: An investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures’, Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Coviello N. E., Ghauri P. N., and Martin K. A.-M. (1998), ‘International competitiveness: Empirical findings from SME service firms’, Journal of International Marketing, 6(2), 8–27.
   Google Scholar
• Danneels E. (2008), ‘Organizational antecedents of second-order capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 519–543.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado-Gómez J.M., Ramírez-Alesón M., and Espitia-Escuer M.A. (2004), ‘Intangible resources as a key factor in the internationalisation of Spanish firms’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53(4), 477–494.
   Google Scholar
• Dhanaraj C. and Beamish P.W. (2003), ‘A resourcebased approach to the study of export performance’, Journal of Small Business Management, 41(3), 242–261.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopolous A. and Kakkos N. (2007), ‘Managerial assessments of export performance: Conceptual framework and empirical illustration’, Journal of International Marketing, 15(3), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning J.H. (2001), ‘The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future’, International Journal of Economics of Business, 8(2), 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K.M. (1989), ‘Building theories from case study research’, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K.M. (1991), ‘Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic’, Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 620–627.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K.M. and Graebner M.E. (2007), ‘Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges’, Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K.M. and Martin J.A. (2000), ‘Dynamic capabilities: What are they? ’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Elg U., Ghauri P.N., and Tarnovskaya V. (2008), ‘The role of networking and matching in market entry to emerging retail markets’, International Marketing Review, 25(6), 674–699.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson T., Nummela N., and Saarenketo S. (2014), Dynamic capability in a small global factory. International Business Review, 23(1), 169–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.03.007.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ortiz R. and Fuentes Lombardo G. (2009), ‘Influence of the capacities of top management on the internationalization of SMEs’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21(2), 131–154.
   Google Scholar
• Filatotchev I. and Piesse J. (2009), ‘R&D, internationalization and growth of newly listed firms: European evidence’, Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1260–1276.
   Google Scholar
• Gassmann O. and Keupp M.M. (2007), ‘The competitive advantage of early and rapidly internationalizing SMEs in the biotechnology industry: A knowledge-based view’, Journal of World Business, 42(3), 350–366.
   Google Scholar
• Graves C. and Thomas G. (2006), ’Internationalization of Australian family businesses: A managerial capabilities perspective’, Family Business Review, 19(3), 207–224.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith D.A. and Harvey M.G. (2001), ‘A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities’, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 597–606.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat C.E. and Lieberman M.B. (2002), ’The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 725–760.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat C.E. and Peteraf M.A. (2003), ‘The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles’, Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.
   Google Scholar
• Helfat C.E. and Winter S.G. (2011), ‘Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: Strategy for the (n)ever-changing world’, Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1243–1250.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt M.A., Bierman L., Uhlenbruck K., and Shimizu K. (2006), ‘The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly’, Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1137–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson G.P. and Healey M.P. (2011), ‘Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 32(13), 1500–1516.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu C.-C. and Pereira A. (2008), ‘Internationalization and performance: The moderating effects of organizational learning’, Omega, 36(2), 188–205.
   Google Scholar
• Hymer S.H. (1976), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibeh K. (2003), ‘Toward a contingency framework of export entrepreneurship: Conceptualisations and empirical evidence’, Small Business Economics, 20(1), 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ibeh K. and Young S. (2001), ‘Exporting as an entrepreneurial act: An empirical study of Nigerian firms’, European Journal of Marketing, 35(5/6), 566–586.
   Google Scholar
• Jantunen A., Puumalainen K., Saarenketo S., and Kyläheiko K. (2005). ‘Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance’, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 223–243.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson J. and Vahlne J.E. (1990), ‘The mechanism of internationalization’, International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kaleka A. (2002), ‘Resources and capabilities driving competitive advantage in export markets: Guidelines for industrial exporters’, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(3), 273–283.
   Google Scholar
• Kaleka A. (2011), ‘When exporting manufacturers compete on the basis of service: Resources and marketing capabilities driving service advantage and performance’, Journal of International Marketing, 19(1), 40–58.
   Google Scholar
• Kaleka A. (2012), ‘Studying resource and capability effects on export venture performance’, Journal of World Business, 47(1), 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• King A.A. and Tucci C.L. (2002), ‘Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities’, Management Science, 48(2), 171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen T. and Madsen T.K. (2002), ‘Export strategy: A dynamic capabilities perspective’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 18(4), 475–502.
   Google Scholar
• Kontinen T. and Ojala A. (2011), ‘Network ties in the international opportunity recognition of family SMEs’, International Business Review, 20(4), 440–453.
   Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M.S. and Zajac E.J. (2001), ‘How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence’, Organizational Science, 12(5), 632–657.
   Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen A. (2012), ‘How to concretize dynamic capabilities? Theory and examples’, Journal of Strategy and Management, 5(4), 381–392.
   Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen A. (2012a), ‘International growth of a Finnish high-tech SME: A dynamic capabilities approach’, Research in Economics & Business: Central & Eastern Europe, 4(2), 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kyläheiko K., Jantunen A., Puumalainen K., Saarenketo S., and Tuppura A. (2011), ‘Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: The role of technological capabilities and appropriability’, International Business Review, 20(5), 508–520.
   Google Scholar
• Lee H., Kelley D., Lee J., and Lee S. (2012), ‘SME survival: The impact of internationalization, technology resources, and alliances’, Journal of Small Business Management, 50(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Leonidou C.L., Katsikeas S.C., and Samiee S. (2002), ‘Marketing strategy determinants of export performance: A meta-analysis’, Journal of Business Research, 55(1), 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Reason L. and Mughan T. (2002), ‘Strategies for internationalisation within SMEs: The key role of the owner-manager’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9(2), 120–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lu J.W. and Beamish P.W. (2006), ‘Partnering strategies and performance of SMEs’ international joint ventures’, Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 461–486.
   Google Scholar
• Luo Y. (2000), ‘Dynamic capabilities in international expansion’, Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355–378.
   Google Scholar
• Luo Y. (2002), ‘Capability exploitation and building in a foreign market: Implications for multinational enterprises’, Organization Science, 13(1), 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Marschan-Piekkari R. and Welch C. (eds) (2004), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• March J.G. (1991), ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, Organization Science, 2(1), 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall P.P. and Oviatt B.M. (2000), ‘International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths’, Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 902–906.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer K. and Skak A. (2002), ‘Networks, serendipity and SME entry into Eastern Europe’, European Management Journal, 20(2), 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Miles M.B. and Huberman A.M. (1994), Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miocevic D. and Crnjak-Karanovic B. (2011), ‘Cognitive and information-based capabilities in the internationalization of small- and mediumsized enterprises: The case of Croatian exporters’, Journal of Small Business Management, 49(4), 537–557.
   Google Scholar
• Moen Ø. (1999), ‘The relationship between firm size, competitive advantages and export performance revisited’, International Small Business Journal, 18(1), 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad O., Julian C.S., Ahmed Z.U., and Tooksoon P. (2011), ‘The marketing capabilities-performance relationship: The empirical link in export ventures‘, International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 4(3), 290–310.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Thomas A. (2009), ‘Online activities and export performance of the smaller firm: A capability perspective’, European Journal of International Management, 3(3), 266–284.
   Google Scholar
• Musteen M., Francis J., and Datta D.K. (2010), ‘The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance: A study of Czech SMEs’, Journal of World Business, 45(3), 197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro A., Acedo F.J., Robson M.J., Ruzo E., and Losada F. (2010), ‘Antecedents and consequences of firms’ export commitment: An empirical study’, Journal of International Marketing, 18(3), 41–61.
   Google Scholar
• Newbert S.L. (2007), ‘Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research’, Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cass A. and Julian C.C. (2003), ‘Examining firm and environmental influences on export marketing mix strategy and export performance of Australian exporters’, European Journal of Marketing, 37(3/4), 366–384.
   Google Scholar
• Oviatt B.M. and McDougall P.P. (1997), ’Challenges for internationalization process theory: The case of international new ventures’, Management International Review, 37(2), 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Pajunen K. and Maunula M. (2008), ‘Internationalisation: A co-evolutionary perspective’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(3), 247–258.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou P.A. and El Sawy O.A. (2011), ‘Understanding the black box of dynamic capabilities’, Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273.
   Google Scholar
• Peng M.W. (2001), ‘The resource-based view and international business’, Journal of Management, 27(6), 803–829.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990). ‘The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Prange C. and Verdier S. (2011), ‘Dynamic capabilities, internationalization processes and performance’, Journal of World Business, 46(1), 126–133.
   Google Scholar
• Sapienza H.J., Autio E., George G., and Zahra S.A. (2006), ‘A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth’, Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 914–933.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy S.D. (2001), ‘Causation and effectuation: Towards a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency’, Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa C.M.P. (2004), ‘Export performance measurement: An evaluation of the empirical research in the literature‘, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 9(12), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa C.M.P., Martínez-López F.J., and Coelho F. (2008), ‘The determinants of export performance: A review of the research in the literature between 1998 and 2005ʹ, International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 343–374.
   Google Scholar
• Tallman S. and Fladmore-Lindquist K. (2002), ‘Internationalization, globalization, and capability-based strategy’, California Management Review, 45(1), 116–135.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M. and Jack R. (2013), ‘Understanding the pace, scale and pattern of firm internationalization: An extension of the ‘born global’ concept’, International Small Business Journal, 31(6), 701–721. doi: 10.1177/0266242611431992.
   Google Scholar
• Teece D.J. (2007), ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
   Google Scholar
• Teece D.J. and Pisano G. (1994), ‘The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556.
   Google Scholar
• Teece D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997), ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. (1997), ‘Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.
   Google Scholar
• Weerawardena J., Sullivan Mort G., Liesch P.W., and Knight G. (2007), ‘Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective’, Journal of World Business, 42(3), 294–306.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. (1984), ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Westhead P., Wright M., and Ucbasaran D. (2001), ‘The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view’, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 333–358.
   Google Scholar
• Yin R.K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zaheer S. (1995), ‘Overcoming the liability of foreignness’, Academy of Mangement Journal, 38(2), 341–363.
   Google Scholar
• Zou S. and Cavusgil S.T. (1996), ‘Global strategy: A review and integrated conceptual framework’, European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 52–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zou S. and Stan S. (1998), ‘The determinants of export performance: A review of the empirical literature between 1987 and 1997ʹ, International Marketing Review, 15(5), 333–356.
   Google Scholar