RESEARCH NOTES: EPAS OBJECTIVES AND FOUNDATION PRACTICE SELF-EFFICACY: A REPLICATION

References

• Amir, Y., & Sharon, I. (1990). Replication research: A "must" for the scientific advancement of psychology. In J. W. Neulip (Ed.), Handbook of replication research in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 51–69). Corte Madera, CA: Select Press (Special issue of the Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1990[5]).
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997a). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997b). Guide for constructing selfefficacy scales. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Baskind, F.R., Shank, B.W., & Ferraro, E.K. (2001). Accountability for professional practice: Assessment in social work education. In C. A. Palomba & T. W. Banta (Eds.), Assessing student competence in accredited disciplines, pioneering approaches to assessment in higher education (pp. 95–119). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Globerman, J. (2002). Evaluating a measure of student field performance in direct service: Testing reliability and validity of explicit criteria. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 385–401.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Power, R., Hughes, J., Woodford, M., & Regehr, G. (2004). Toward new approaches for evaluating student field performance: Tapping the implicit criteria used by experienced field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 417–426.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R.F. (1990). Publication politics, experimenter bias and the replication process in social science research. In J. W. Neulip (Ed.), Handbook of replication research in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 71–82). Corte Madera, CA: Select Press (Special issue of the Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1990[5]).
   Google Scholar
• Buchan, V., Rodenhiser, R., Hull, G., Smith, M., Rogers, J., Pike, C., & Ray, J. (2004). Evaluating an assessment tool for undergraduate social work education: Analysis of the Baccalaureate Educational Assessment Package. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 239–253.
   Google Scholar
• Cliff, N. (1987). Analyzing multivariate data. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cuzzi, L.C., Holden, G., Chernack, P., Rutter, S., & Rosenberg, G. (1997). Evaluating social work field instruction: Rotations versus year-long placements. Research on Social Work Practice, 7, 402–414.
   Google Scholar
• Cuzzi, L. C., Holden, G., Rutter, S. Rosenberg, G., & Chernack, P. (1996). A pilot study of fieldwork rotations vs. year long placements for social work students in a public hospital. Social Work in Health Care, 24, 73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Fahs, P.S., Morgan, L. L., & Kalman, M. (2003). A call for replication. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35(1), 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Frans, D. J. (1993). A scale for measuring social worker empowerment. Research on Social Work Practice, 3, 312–328.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. D. (2000). Honest brokering of knowledge and ignorance. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 387–397.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. D. (2001a). Educational policy and accreditation standards: Do they work for clients? Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 226–239.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. D. (2001b). Evaluating the quality of social work education: Options galore. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 418–429.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. A., & Floyd, C. E. (2002). Addressing evaluative standards related to program assessment: How do we respond? Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 369–382.
   Google Scholar
• Gingerich, W. J., Kaye, K. M., & Bailey, D. (1999). Assessing quality in social work education: Focus on diversity. Assessment in Higher Education, 24(2), 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G. (1991). The relationship of self-efficacy appraisals to subsequent health related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Work in Health Care, 16, 53–93.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Anastas, J., & Meenaghan, T. (2003). Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives: Evidence for the use of self-efficacy as an outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 425–440.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Barker, K., Meenaghan, T., & Rosenberg, G. (1999). Research self-efficacy: A new possibility for educational outcomes assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 3, 463–476.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Cuzzi, L. C., Rutter, S., Chernack, P., Spitzer, W., & Rosenberg, G. (1997). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: A partial replication and extension. Health & Social Work, 22, 256–263.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Cuzzi, L. C., Rutter, S., Chernack, P., & Rosenberg, G. (1997). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: A replication. Research on Social Work Practice, 7, 490–499.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Cuzzi, L. C., Rutter, S., Rosenberg, G., & Chernack, P. (1996). The Hospital Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale: Initial development. Research on Social Work Practice, 6, 353–365.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Moncher, M. S., Schinke, S. P., & Barker, K. M. (1990). Self-efficacy of children, and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 66, 1044–1046.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S., & Dailey, P. R. (1979). Response shift bias: A source of contamination of selfreport measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 144–150.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G.H., Mather, J.H., Christopherson, P.M., & Young, C.M. (1994). Quality assurance in social work education: a comparison of outcome assessments across the continuum. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 388–396.
   Google Scholar
• Lamal, P. A. (1990). On the importance of replication. In J. W. Neulip (Ed.), Handbook of replication research in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 31–35). Corte Madera, CA: Select Press (Special issue of the Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1990[5]).
   Google Scholar
• Ley, P., & Florio, T. (1996). The use of readability formulas in health care. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1, 7–28
   Google Scholar
• Murray, F. B. (2001). From consensus standards to evidence of claims: Assessment and accreditation in the case of teacher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 113(Spring), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–60). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1990). Replication in behavioral research. In J. W. Neulip (Ed.), Handbook of replication research in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 1–30). Corte Madera, CA: Select Press (Special issue of the Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1990[5]).
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, W. D. (2001). Replication in field research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(15). Retrieved July 15, 2004, from: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=15
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar