92
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN FIELD EDUCATION PLACEMENTS: THE FINDINGS OF A 6-YEAR AUSTRALIAN STUDY OF ADMISSIONS DATA

, &
Pages 67-84 | Published online: 16 Mar 2013

References

  • Australian Association of Social Workers. (2000, July). Policy and procedures for establishing eligibility for membership of Australian Association of Social Workers. Kingston, ACT: Author.
  • Bogo, M., & Davin, C. (1989). The use of admissions criteria and a practice skills measure in predicting academic and practicum performance of MSW students. Canadian Social Work Review, 6(1), 95–109.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
  • Cooper, L. (1994). Improved assessment practices in field education. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 110–124.
  • Cunningham, M. (1982). Admission variables and the prediction of success in an undergraduate fieldwork program. Journal of Education for Social Work, 18(2), 84–92.
  • Dailey, D. (1974). The validity of admissions predictions: Implications for social work education. Journal of Education for Social Work, 10(1), 12–19.
  • Dailey, D. (1979). The validity of admissions predictions: a replication study and implications for the future. Journal of Education for Social Work, 15(2), 14–22.
  • Duder, S., & Aronson, J. (1978). Values in the admission process: An application on multidimensional scaling. Canadian Journal of Social Work Education, 4, 56–76.
  • Dunlap, W. (1979). How effective are graduate social work admission criteria? Journal of Education f for Social Work, 15(3), 96–102.
  • Dunlap, K., Henley, H., & Fraser, M. (1998). The relationship between admissions criteria and academic performance in an MSW Program. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 437–453.
  • Gibbs, P. (1994). Screening mechanisms in BSW programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 63–74.
  • Glenmaye, L., & Oakes, M. (2002). Assessing suitability of MSW applicants through objective scoring of personal statements, Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 67–83.
  • Hepler, J., & Noble, J. (1990). Improving social work education: Taking responsibility at the door. Social Work, 35, 126–133.
  • Hughes, L., Heycox, K., & Eisenberg, M. (1994). Fear of "failing": Field teachers and the assessment of marginal students. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 139–146.
  • Jaffe, E. (1989). Disadvantaged students in social work education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 1, 305–335.
  • Kunnen, N., & Leitman, S. (2000). More than gatekeeping: Enacting conflicting duty (ies) of care in field education. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 3(1), 59–71.
  • Manzo, D., & Ross, G. (1990). Socialization outcomes of part time graduate professional social work education: A comparison of adult students in career transition to social work with returning adult students who have undergraduate training and practical experience in social work (Electronic Data Resources Service Higher Education Report #HE27679). Springfield, VA: Electronic Data Resources Service.
  • Miller, J., & Koerin, B. (1998). Can we assess suitability at admission? A review of MSW application procedures. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 455–462.
  • Munro, E. (1995). Selecting students for a social work master's degree courses. Issues in Social Work Education, 15(1), 21–32.
  • Neugeboren, B. (1988). Field practica in social work administration: Tasks, auspice, selection criteria and outcomes. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(4), 151–158.
  • Pelech, W., Stalker, C., Regehr, C., & Jacobs, M. (1999). Making the grade: The quest for validity in admissions decisions. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 215–226.
  • Pfouts, J., & Henley, H. (1977). Admissions roulette: Predictive factors for success in practice. Journal of Education for Social Work, 13(3), 56–62.
  • Ryan, M., Cleak, H., Brophy, L., & Furlong, M. (1998, September). An exploratory study of admission variables and prediction of success in an Australian BSW field education program. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Social Work and Welfare Educators, Cairns, Queensland.
  • Ryan, M., Cleak, H., Brophy, L., & Furlong, M. (2000). An exploratory study of the relationship of admission variables and performance in the field education program in an Australian BSW course. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 3(1), 117–135.
  • Ryan, M., Cleak, H., & McCormack, J. (2002, October). Predicting student performance in field education placements at admission: A report on a continuing 5-year study of the relationship of admission variables and student performance in the field education practica in the BSW program at La Trobe University, Melbourne. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Social Work and Welfare Education Conference, Perth, Western Australia.
  • Ryan, M., Habibis, D., & Craft, C. (1997). Guarding the gates of the profession: Findings of a survey of screening mechanisms in Australian BSW programs. Australian Social Work, 50(3), 5–12.
  • Ryan, M., Habibis, D., & Craft, C. (1998). Towards better gatekeeping: Discussion of the findings of a survey of gatekeeping mechanisms in Australian bachelor of social work programs. Australian Social Work, 51(1), 9–15.
  • Ryan, M., Sheehan, R., & Hawkins, L. (1999). Postgraduate social work education in Australia: Findings of a preliminary survey. Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, 2(2), 109–117.
  • Schubert, M. (1964). Admission decisions: Repetition of a study. Social Service Review, 38, 147–152.
  • Specht, H., Britt, D., & Frost, C. (1984). Undergraduate education and professional achievement of MSWs. Social Work, 29, 219–224.
  • Stratton, K. (2000). Before and after science: Admissions process to Australian university social work courses. Australian Social Work, 53(30), 29–35.
  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
  • Weinbach, R. & Grinnell, R. (2004). Statistics for social workers (6th ed.) Boston: Pearson Education.
  • Younes, M. (1998). The gatekeeping dilemma in undergraduate social work programs: Collision of ideal and reality. International Social Work, 41(2), 145–153.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.