330
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

RETHINKING REFLECTIVE PRACTICE EDUCATION IN SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION: A BLENDED CONSTRUCTIVIST AND OBJECTIVIST INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN STRATEGY FOR A WEB-BASED CHILD WELFARE PRACTICE COURSE

Pages 85-103 | Published online: 16 Mar 2013

References

  • Abell, M., & Galinsky, M. (2002). Introducing students to computer-based group work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 3(1), 39–54.
  • Aronson, D. T., & Briggs, L. J. (1983). Contributions of Gagne and Briggs to a prescriptive model of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 75–100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Blanchette, J., & Kanuka, H. (1999, June). Applying constructivist learning principles in the virtual classroom. In B. Collis & R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of ed-media 1999: World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia, and telecommunications, Seattle, Washington (pp. 434–439). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  • Borich, G. (2000). Effective teaching methods (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Walker, D. (1993). Using experience for learning. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research Into Higher Education and Open University Press.
  • Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bruner, J. (1973). Going beyond the information given. New York: Norton.
  • Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cognition and Technology Group. (1991). Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 115–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Designing learning environments that support thinking: The Jasper series as a case study. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, D. H. Jonassen, & T. Welsh (Eds.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 9–36). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological method. London: Butterworth.
  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Duff, R. E., Brown, M. H., & Van Scoy, I. J. (1995). Reflection and self-evaluation: Keys to professional development. Young Children, 50(4), 81–88.
  • Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivist and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(40), 50–72.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.
  • Friedman, M. I., & Fisher, S. P. (1998). Handbook on effective instructional strategies for decision making. Columbia, SC: Institute for Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Education.
  • Gagné, R. M., Wager, W. W., & Briggs, L. J. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into web courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), 29–35.
  • Gros, B., Elen, J., Kerres, M., Merrienboer, J., & Spector, M. (1997). Instructional design and the authoring of multimedia and hypermedia systems: Does a marriage make sense? Educational Technology, 37(1), 48–56.
  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.
  • Guzdial, M., & Kehoe, C. (1998). Apprenticeshipbased learning environments: A principled approach to providing software-realized scaffolding through hypermedia. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 9(3/4), 289–336.
  • Hutchings, P., & Wutzdorff, A. (1988). Experiential learning across the curriculum: Assumptions and principles. In P. Hutchings & A. Wutzdorff (Eds.), Knowing and doing: Learning through experience: New directions for teaching and learning (No. 35, pp. 5–19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivist vs. constructivist: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology: Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14.
  • Jonassen, D., Davidson, A., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26.
  • Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kinzie, M. B., & Berdel, R. L. (1990). Design and use of hypermedia systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 61–68.
  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17.
  • Presseley, M., Hogan, K., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Mistretta, J. (1996). The challenges of instructional scaffolding: The challenges of instruction that supports student thinking. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(3), 138–146.
  • Rand, A., Binswanger, H., & Peikoff, L. (Eds.). (1990). Introduction into objectivist epistemology (2nd ed.). London: Meridian Books.
  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1991). Reflections on the implications of constructivism for educational technology. Educational technology, 31(10), 34–37.
  • Ricks, F., & Charlesworth, J. (2003). Emergent practice planning. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  • Saskatchewan Education, Training, and Employment (1991). Instructional approaches: A framework for professional practice. Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada: Ministry of Education.
  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1993). Instructional design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Colson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structure domains [Electronic version]. Educational Technology. Retrieved September 15, 2001, from http://phoenix.sce.fct.unl.pt/simposio/Rand_Spiro.htm
  • Venezky, R., & Osin, L. (1991). The intelligent design of computer-assisted instruction. New York: Longman.
  • Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (1999, March). Interaction in an online course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
  • Wagner, E. D. (1997). In support of a functional definition of interaction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 19–26.
  • Wild, M., & Quinn, C. (1997). Implications of educational theory for the design of instructional multimedia. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 73–82.
  • Winfield, W., Mealy, M., & Scheibel, P. (1998, August). Design considerations for enhancing confidence and participation in web-based courses. In Distance Learning '98. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Learning and Teaching, Madison, WI.
  • Winn, W. D. (1991). The assumptions of constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, 31(9), 38–40.
  • Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.