References
- Bales, S., Eklund, S., Siffin, C. (2000). Children's perceptions of elders before and after a school-based intergenerational program. Educational G Gerontology, 26, 677–689.
- Barton, H. (1999). Effects of an intergenerational program on the attitudes of emotionally disturbed youth toward the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 25, 623–640.
- Bengston, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1), 1–16.
- Berkman, B., Silverstone, B., Simmons, W. J., Volland, P. J., & Howe, J. L. (2001). Social work gerontological practice: The need for faculty development in the new millennium. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 34(1), 5–23.
- Bostrum, A., Hatton-Yeo, A., Ohsako, T., & Sawano, Y. (2000). A general assessment of IP initiatives in the countries involved. In A. Hatton-Yeo & T. Ohsako (Eds.), Intergenerational programmes: Public policy and research implication and international perspectives (pp. 3–8). Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Education.
- Chowdhary, U., Schultz, C. M., Hasselris, P., Kujath, H. A., Penn, D., & Hensen S. (2000). Intergenerating activities and aging appreciation of elementary school children. Educational Gerontology, 26, 541–565.
- Damron-Rodriguez, J., & Lubben, J. (1997). The 1995 White House Conference on Aging: An agenda for social work education and training. In C. Salz (Ed.), Social work response to the 1995 White House Conference on Aging: From issues to action(pp. 65–77). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
- Damron-Rodriguez, J., Villa, V., Tseng, F., & Lubben, J. (1997). Demographic and organizational influences on the development of gerontological social work curriculum. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 17(3), 3–18.
- Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. (2005). Multigenerational health, development and equality. The Gerontologist, 44(6), 125–130.
- Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., & Bonifas, R. P. (In press). Multigenerational practice and curricular infusion. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships.
- Fredriksen-Goldsen, K., & Hooyman, N. (2005). A multigenerational paradigm for social work education. Unpublished manuscript under review.
- Hodges, M. (1996). Strengthening gerontological social work through faculty development. Educational Gerontology 22(1), 37–52.
- Hooyman, N. R., & Kiyak, A. H. (2002). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Kassab, C., & Vance, L. (1999). An assessment of the effectiveness of an intergenerational program for youth. Psychological Reports, 84, 198–200.
- Kingson, E. R., & Williamson, J. B. (1993). The generational equity debate: A progressive framing of a conservative issues. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 5(3), 31–53.
- Kuehne, V. S. (1999). Intergenerational programs: Understanding what we have created. Child and Youth Services, 20(1/2), 1–3.
- Kuehne, V. S. (2003a). The state of our art: Intergenerational program research and evaluation: Part one. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 145–161.
- Kuehne, V. S. (2003b). The state of our art: Intergenerational program research and evaluation: Part two. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(2), 79–94.
- Lubben J. E., Damron-Rodriguez, J., & Beck, J. C. (1992). A national survey of aging curriculum in schools of social work. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 18(3/4), 157–171.
- Meredith, S. D., & Watt, S. (1994). The gerontology development project: Infusing gerontology into social work curriculum. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 15(2), 91–100.
- Newman, S. (2003). An introductory message from the editor. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 1–4.
- Newman, S., Faux, R., & Larimer, B. (1997). Children's view s of aging: Their attitudes and values. The Gerontologist, 37(3), 412–417.
- Olson, C. J. (2002). A curriculum module enhances students' gerontological practice-related knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 38(4), 85–101.
- Rosebrook, V., & Larkin, E. (2003). Introducing standards and guidelines: A rationale for defining the knowledge, skills, and dispositions of intergenerational practice. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 133–144.
- Rosen, A. L., & Zlotnik, J. L. (2001). Demographics and reality: The "disconnect" in social work education. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 36(3/4), 81–97.
- SAGE-SW (n.d.) Social work with older people [brochure]. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
- Scharlach, A., Damron-Rodriguez, J., Robinson, R., & Feldman, R. (2000). Educating social workers for an aging society: A vision for the 21st century. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(3), 521–540.
- Torres-Gil, F. M. (2003). Perspectives on intergenerational aspects of aging and diversity. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 5–9.
- Uhlenberg, P. (1996). Mutual attraction: Demography and life-course analysis. TheGerontologist, 36, 226–229.
- U.S. Administration on Aging. (2003). Older population by age: 1900 to 2050. Retrieved February 20, 2003, from http://www.aoa.gov/prof/Statistics/online_stat_data/AgePop2050.asp
- VanderVen, K. (1999). Intergenerational theory: The missing element in today's intergenerational programs. In V. S. Kuehne (Ed.), Intergenerational programs: Understanding what we have created (pp. 33–47). New York: Haworth.
- Watt, S., & Meredith, S. (1995). Integrating gerontology into social work education programs. Educational Gerontology, 21, 55–68.
- Wisensale, S. K. (2003). Global aging and intergenerational equity. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(1), 29–47.