HOW IS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TAUGHT AT THE MASTER'S LEVEL?

References

• Aguilar, G. (1995). Minority content in undergraduate social work curricula. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 1(1), 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Allen-Meares, P., & Lane, B. (1990). Social work practice: Integrating qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques. Social Work, 35(5), 451–458.
   Google Scholar
• Anastas, J. W. (1999). Research design for social work and the human services (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumohl, J., & Stahl, R. (2003, January). Ethical snares in fieldwork for contracted program evaluation. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work and Research Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Burnette, D. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching qualitative research: A compendium of model syllabi. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chenail, R. (1998). Qualitative research online syllabi. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/syllabi.html
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, M. (2003). Qualitative analysis: A teaching tool for social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 2(1), 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (1994). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2003). Handbook of accreditation standards and procedures (5th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2004). Statistics on social work education in the United Sates: 2002. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Drisko, J. (1997). Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to enhance academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 185–197.
   Google Scholar
• Drisko, J. (1998). Using qualitative data analysis software: Merits and hazards. Computers in Human Services, 15(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Drisko, J. (2001). How do clinical social workers evaluate practice? Smith College Studies in Social Work, 71(3), 419–439.
   Google Scholar
• Drisko, J. (2003, January). Improving sampling strategies and terminology in qualitative research. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work and Research Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, K. (1993). A history of research in social work education: 1915–1991. Journal of Social Work Education, 29, 293–301.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, M., Jenson, J., & Lewis, R. (1991). Training for research scholarship in social work doctoral programs. Social Service Review, 65(4), 597–613.
   Google Scholar
• Gilgun, J. (1994). Acase for case studies in social work research. Social Work, 39, 371–380.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, N. (1999). Qualitative practice evaluation. In I. Shaw & J. Lishman (Eds.), Evaluation and social work practice (pp. 63–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, A. (1994). Setting the theme: Many ways of knowing. In E. Sherman & W. Reid (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 459–463). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henley, H., & Dunlap, K. (1996). Policies and performance in the MSW research curriculum. Arete, 20(2), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsley, E. (1998). The impact of homelessness and shelter life on family relationships. Family Relations, 47, 243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Marino, R., Green, R., & Young, E. (1998). Beyond the scientist practitioner model's failure to thrive: Social workers participation in agency-based research activities. Social Work Research, 20(2), 188–912.
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, M., Birch, M., Jessop, J., & Miller, T. (Eds.). (2002). Ethics in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T. (1992). Teaching social workers research methods: Orthodox doctrine, heresy, or an atheistic compromise. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 6(1), 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., & Reynolds, W. (2003, January). Children in research: A qualitative exploration of assent, risk, and voluntariness. Paper presented at the Society for Social Work and Research Annual Conference, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, D., & O'Neill, B. (2004). Toward social justice: Teaching qualitative research. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(3/4), 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Oktay, J. (2004). Grounded theory. In D. Padgett (Ed.), The qualitative research experience (pp. 23–47). Belmont, CA: Thompson.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 83–98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. (Ed.). (1994). Qualitative studies in social work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rodwell, M., & Woody, D. (1994). Constructivist evaluation: The policy/practice context. In E. Sherman & W. Reid (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 315– 372). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research methods for social work (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ruckdeshel, R., Earnshaw, P., & Ferrik, A. (1994). The qualitative case study and evaluation: Issues, methods, and examples. In E. Sherman & W. Reid (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 251–264). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sar, B., Yankeelov, P., Wulff, D., & Singer, T. (2003). "Equal time" and "equal voice": A model foundation research course. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(3/4), 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J., & Silverman, D. (2004). Qualitative research practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sells, S., Smith, T., & Newfield, N. (1997). Teaching ethnographic research methods in social work: A model course. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 167–185.
   Google Scholar
• Shelby, R. D. (2000). Using the mentoring relationship to facilitate rigor in qualitative research. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 70(2), 315–328.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, E., & Reid, W. (1994). Qualitative research in social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, K. (1995). The strategy of grounded theory: Possibilities and problems. Social Work Research, 19(1), 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Wodarski, J., Feit, M., & Green, R. (1995). Graduate social work education: Areview of two decades of empirical research and consideration for the future. Social Service Review, 69(1), 106–130.
   Google Scholar
• Zeiger, S. (1995). A case for the inclusion of qualitative methodology into research course content. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 1(1), 111–124.
   Google Scholar