DEVELOPING STUDENT KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS FOR HOME-BASED SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

References

• Allen, S. F., & Tracy, E. M. (2004). Revitalizing the role of home visiting in schools. Children and Schools, 26(4), 197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Astor, R. A., Behre, W. J., Wallace, J. M., & Fravil, K. A. (1998). School social workers and school violence: Personal safety, training, and violence programs. Social Work, 43, 223–232.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. J. L., Piotrkowski, C. S., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1999). The home instruction program for preschool youngsters (HIPPY). Future of Children, 9, 116–133.
   Google Scholar
• Beder, J. (1998). The home visit, revisited. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 79, 514–522.
   Google Scholar
• Birt, C. (1956). Family-centered project of St. Paul. Social Work, 2, 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Brickman, P., Kidder, L. H., Coates, D., Rabinowitz, V., Cohn, E., & Karuza, J. (1983). The dilemmas of helping: Making aid fair and effective. In J. D. Fisher, A. Nadler, & B. M. DePaulo (Eds.), New directions in helping, Volume 1: Recipient reactions to aid (pp. 17–49). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and by design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (n.d.). Pictures #1 & #2. Levels of Intensive Family Training, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Burry, C. L. (2002). Working with potentially violent clients in their homes: What child welfare professionals need to know. Clinical Supervisor, 2(1), 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B., & Bradley, R. (1984). Home observation for measurement of the environment (HOME), revised edition. Little Rock: University of Arkansas.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Jordan, C., & Coleman, H. (2007). An introduction to family social work (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, J. (2000). Family interventions with child physical abuse and neglect: A critical review. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 563–591.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2001). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, A., Fuddy, L., Burrell, L., Higman, S. M., McFarlane, E., Windham, A., et al. (2004). Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse: Impact in reducing parental risk factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 623–643.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J. (2000). Revisiting 'rethinking early intervention.' Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(2), 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (1994). Aims and principles of family support programs. In C. J. Dunst, C. M. Trivette, & A. G. Deal (Eds.), Supporting and strengthening families: Volume 1—Methods, strategies, and practices (pp. 30–48).Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Elkan, R., Kendrick, D., Dewey, M., Hewitt, M., Robinson, J., Blair, M., et al. (2001). Effectiveness of home-based support for older people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 323, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. E., Boothroyd, R. A., Armstrong, M. I., Greenbaum, P. E., Brown, E. C., & Kuppinger, A. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effectiveness of intensive inhome crisis services for children and their families: Program outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(2), 92–104.
   Google Scholar
• Farran, D. C. (2000). Another decade of intervention for children who are low income or disabled: What do we know now? In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed., pp. 510–548). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, B. J., & Poertner, J. (Eds.). (1995). From case management to service coordination for children with emotional, behavioral, or emotional disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. Gomby, D. S., Culross, P. L., & Behrman, R. E. (1999). Home visiting: Recent program evaluations—Analysis and recommendations. Future of Children, 9, 4–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gomby, D. S., Culross, P. L., & Behrman, R. E. (1999). Home visiting: Recent program evaluations—Analysis and recommendations. Future of Children, 9, 4–26.
   Google Scholar
• Guterman, N. B., & Taylor, C. A. (2005). Prevention of physical child abuse and neglect. In G. P. Mallon & P. M. Hess (Eds.), Child welfare for the twenty-first century (pp. 270–289). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, B. L., & Pelton, L. H. (1989). Home visits: History and functions. Social Casework: The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 70(1), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., & Smith, L. A. (1992). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: An effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 953–961.
   Google Scholar
• Henggeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Borduin, C. M., Rowland, M. D., & Cunningham, P. B. (1998). Multisystemic treatment of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: Treatment manuals for practitioners. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals With Disabilities Improvement Education Act of 2004, Public Law 108-446, 108th Cong., Stat. 2647 (December 3, 2004), 118.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S. L. (1997). Parental perceptions of helpgiving practices and control appraisal in early intervention programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17(4), 457–476.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, S. P., Whittaker, J. K., & Tracy, E. M. (1997). Person–environment practice: The social ecology of interpersonal helping. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzman, H., Yoos, L., Cole, R., Korfmacher, J., & Hanks, C. (1997). Prenatal and early childhood home-visitation program processes: A case illustration. Journal of Community Psychology, 25(1), 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• LeCroy, C. W., & Whitaker, K. (2005). Improving the quality of home visitation: An exploratory study of difficult situations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 1003– 1013.
   Google Scholar
• Lightburn, A., & Schamess, G. (2002). The generativity and intergenerational nature of social work practice. In A. R. Roberts & G. J. Greene (Eds.), Social workers' desk reference (pp. 817–821). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad-Goldberg, M., Dore, M. M., & Stern, L. (1998). Creating competence from chaos. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Littell, J. H., Popa, M., & Forsythe, B. (2005). Multisystemic therapy for social, emotional, and behavioral problems in youth aged 10–17 (Protocol for a Campbell Collaboration Review). Retrieved October 13, 2006, from http://www.campbell collaboration.org/doc-pdf/Mst_Littell_ Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, G., & Filer, J. (1996). How responsive is early intervention to the priorities and needs of families. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 16(4), 437–457.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, G., O'Sullivan, P., & Dennebaum, J. (1990). A national study of mothers' perceptions of family-focused early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 14(2), 133–146.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliam, R. A., & Scott, S. (2001). Asupport approach to early intervention: A threepart framework. Infants and Young Children, 13(4), 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. E., & Landsman, M. J. (1992). Alternative models of family preservation: Family-based services in context. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Odeh, M. S., Zeiss, R. A., & Huss, M. T. (2006). Cues they use: Clinicians' endorsement of risk cues in predictions of dangerousness. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24(2), 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Osher, T. W., & Osher, D. M. (2002). The paradigm shift to true collaboration with families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 11(1), 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Retrieved February 25, 2005, from http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/FinalReport/toc.html
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, M. E. (1899/1969). Friendly visiting among the poor. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, E. A., Ispa, J. M., Thornburg, K. R., & Lane, V. (2003). Relations among mother and home visitor personality, relationship quality, and amount of time spent in home visits. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(6), 591–606.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, R. G., & Layzer, J. I. (1999). Using home visits for multiple purposes: The Comprehensive Child Development Program. Future of Children, 9, 134–151.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, M. A., & Appelbaum, M. I. (2004). Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75, 1435–1456.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, A. P., Turbiville, V., & Turnbull, H. R. (2000). Evolution of family–professional partnerships: Collective empowerment as the model for the early twenty-first century. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed., pp. 630–650). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, E., Sandau-Beckler, P., & Mannes, M. (Eds.). (2001). Balancing family-centered services and child well-being: Exploring issues in policy, practice, theory, and research. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasik, B. H., & Bryant, D. M. (2001). Home visiting: Procedures for helping families (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, H. B. (1993). Home visits: Necessary but not sufficient. Future of Children, 3, 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, S. J. (1985). How we make decisions in child protective services intake investigation. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar