GENERAL AND SUPERVISION-SPECIFIC ATTACHMENT STYLES: RELATIONS TO STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF FIELD SUPERVISORS

References

• Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, M. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709–716.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bahrick, A. (1990). Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the supervisory working alliance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(3–B), 1484 (Abstract No. 1991–51645).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. (2008). Attachment-informed supervision for social work field education. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36, 97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., & Deal, K. (in press). Beginnings and endings in social work supervision: The interaction between attachment and developmental processes. Journal of Teaching in Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., & Saks, L. (2006). A conceptual application of attachment theory and research to the social work student-field instructor supervisory relationship. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11, 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzarelli, C., Hoekstra, S., & Bylsma, W. (2000). General versus specific mental models of attachment: Are they associated with different outcomes? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 605–618.
   Google Scholar
• Creasey, G., & Ladd, A. (2005). Generalized and specific attachment representations: Unique and interactive roles in predicting conflict behaviors in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1026–1038.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. (2002). Attachment behavior and psychotherapy supervision. Dissertation Abstracts International: A, 64 (02). (UMI No. 3082649)
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A., & Abramson, J. (1993). Predictors of satisfaction with field practicum among social work students. The Clinical Supervisor, 11, 95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Fraley, C. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: A meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 123–151.
   Google Scholar
• Fraley, C. (2005). Relationship structures (RS) questionnaire. Retrieved August 25, 2005, from http://www.psych.uiuc.edu/∼rcfraley/measures/relstructures.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fraley, C., & Shaver, P. (2000). Adult romantic attachments: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154.
   Google Scholar
• Friedlander, M., & Ward, L. (1984). Development and validation of the supervisory styles inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 541–557.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships, Vol. 5: Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 17–52). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A. (1992). What's wrong, what's right with social work supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 10, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klohnen, E. C., Weller, J. A., Luo, S., & Choe, M. (2005). Organization and predictive power of general and relationshipspecific attachment models: One for all, and all for one? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1665–1682.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students' views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 357–379.
   Google Scholar
• Kurdek, L. (2002). On being insecure about the assessment of attachment styles. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 811–834.
   Google Scholar
• Ladany, N., & Lehrman-Waterman, D. (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self-disclosure and their relationship to supervisor style. Counselor Education & Supervision, 38, 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, C. (2002). Handbook of clinical social work supervision (3rd ed.). New York: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., & Friedlander, M. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee's perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 384–395.
   Google Scholar
• Neswald-McCalip, R. (1995). Development of the secure counselor: Case examples supporting Pistole & Watkins's (1995) discussion of attachment theory in counseling supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, C. (2002). Using developmental processes in supervision: A psychodynamic approach. The Clinical Supervisor, 21, 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. (2001). Global and specific relational models in the experience of social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 613–631.
   Google Scholar
• Pistole, C., & Watkins, E. (1995). Attachment theory, counseling process, and supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 457–478.
   Google Scholar
• Power, R., & Bogo, M. (2002). Educating field instructors and students to deal with challenges in their teaching relationships. The Clinical Supervisor, 21, 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, B. (1942). Learning and teaching in the practice of social work. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Rholes, S., & Simpson, J. (Eds.). (2004). Attachment theory: Basic concepts and contemporary questions. In S. Rholes & J. Simpson (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research and clinical implications (pp. 3–14). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, S., & Bretz, K. (2006). Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship: An exploratory investigation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 558–566.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. (1936). Supervision in social casework. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, C. (1989). The process of learning in clinical social work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 50, 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1993). Interactional supervision. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Towle, C. (1954). The learner in education for the professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, T., & Kokotovic, A. (1989). Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 1, 207– 210.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, E. (1995). Pathological attachment styles in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy, 32, 333–340.
   Google Scholar
• White, V., & Queener, J. (2003). Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education & Supervision, 42, 203–218.
   Google Scholar