INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN DOCTORAL SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION: DOES IT MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

References

• Abbott, A. D. (1999). Department & discipline: Chicago sociology at one hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C. (1996). Organizational ecology. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 77–114). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blossfeld, H. P., & Rohwer, G. (2002). Techniques of event history: Modeling new approaches to causal analysis (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. D. (1999). The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences, 32, 327–337.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, F. J. (1957). Trends in social work 1874–1956. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, G., & Hannan, M. T. (2000). The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. (1993). The two cultures. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuzick, J. (1985). Asymptotic properties of censored linear rank-tests. Annals of Statistics, 13(1), 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (1993). Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. (1992). The uses and limitations of citation data as science indicators (Reprinted from Science and Public-Policy, (19) 321–327, 1992). Current Contents, 49, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hagoel, L., & Kalekin-Fishman, D. (2002). Crossing borders: Toward a transdisciplinary scientific identity. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 297–308.
   Google Scholar
• Håkanson, M. (2005). The impact of gender on citations: An analysis of college & research libraries, journal of academic librarianship, and library quarterly. College & Research Libraries, 66, 312–322.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, B. (1999). Interdisciplinarity: for what purpose? Policy Sciences, 32, 339– 343.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. A. (1993). Regression with dummy variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005). Bibliometrics: A potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions, Social Work in Health Care, 41(3–4), 67–92.
   Google Scholar
• Karlqvist, A. (1999). Going beyond disciplines: The meanings of interdisciplinarity, Policy Sciences, 32, 379–383.
   Google Scholar
• Kimble, G. A. (1984). Psychology's two cultures. American Psychologist, 39, 833–839.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural perspectives on academic work. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 711–739.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R., Voight, L. J., & Fath, K. Q. (2004). Does interdisciplinarity promote learning? Theoretical support and researchable questions. Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2003). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2003). Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1237–1249.
   Google Scholar
• Nissani, M. (1997). Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. Social Science Journal, 34, 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, S. L. (1999). Interdisciplinarity: Potentials and challenges. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(2), 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.
   Google Scholar
• Romm, N. R. A. (1998). Interdisciplinary practice as reflexivity. Systemic Practice and Action Research,, 11(1), 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, N., Speers, M. A., Silva, J. M., Tomes, H., & Gentry, J. H. (Eds.). (2001). Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Seipel, M. M. O. (2003). Assessing publication for tenure. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sibeon, R. (1991). Towards a new sociology of social work. Aldershot, Hants, England: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sil, R. (2000). The division of labor in social science research: Unified methodology or "organic solidarity"? Polity, 32, 499–531.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171–193.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. (2005). Stata statistical software: Release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
   Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A., & Arnold, T. G. (2003). A program guide to doctoral study in social work. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D. J. (1996). Eclecticism is not a free good: Barriers to knowledge development in social work. Social Service Review, 70, 400–434.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D. J. (2004). The self-study report of the interdepartmental program in social work in social science (Vol. I). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D. J., Garvin, C. G. & Sarri, R. C. (1997). Introduction: Evolution and change in the relationship between social work and social science. In D. J. Tucker, C. D. Garvin, & R. C. Sarri (Eds.), Integrating knowledge and practice: The case of social work and social science (pp. 1–23). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D. J., & Hurl, L. F. (1992). An ecological study of the dynamics of foster-home entries. Social Service Review, 66, 617–641.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D. J., Hurl, L. F., & Ford, H. (1994). Applying organizational ecology to the family: The case of who persists in providing foster-care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 1005–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Van Raan, A. F. J. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 36, 397–420.
   Google Scholar
• Vinter, R. D., & Sarri, R. C. (1997). Doctoral education in social work and social science at Michigan. In D. J. Tucker, C. D. Garvin, & R. C. Sarri (Eds.), Integrating knowledge and practice: The case of social work and social science (pp. 273–298). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1930)
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1934)
   Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307–333.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. M. (2001). Unthinking social science: The limits of nineteenth-century paradigms. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wonnacott, R. J., & Wonnacott, T. H. (1970). Econometrics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wulczyn, F. (1996). A statistical and methodological framework for analyzing the foster care experiences of children. Social Service Review, 70, 318–329.
   Google Scholar