TECHNOLOGY AND WEB-BASED SUPPORT

References

• Arthur, D., et al. (2001). The effect of technology on the caring attributes of an international sample of nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies 38(1), 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Axisa, F., et al. (2005). Flexible technologies and smart clothing for citizen medicine, home healthcare, and disease prevention. IEEE Transactions in Information Technology in Biomedicine 9(3), 325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. (2004). Introducing telecare: The international experience. Public Policy and Aging Report 14(1), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, D. M., et al. (1998). The buffering effect of a computer support network on caregiver strain. Journal of Aging and Health 10(1), 20–43.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, N., et al. (2005). Worksite-based Internet multimedia program for family caregivers of persons with dementia. Gerontologist 45(6), 793–801.
   Google Scholar
• Berland, G. K., et al. (2001). Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association 285(20), 2612–2621.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, K. H, & Baugh, A. C. (2007). Applying research evidence to optimize telehomecare. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 22(1), 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, P. F., et al. (1995). The effects of a special computer network on caregivers of persons with Alzheimer's disease. Nursing Research 44(3), 166–172.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies. (2008). What is CHESS? University of Wisconsin–Madison. https://chess.wisc.edu/chess/projects/about_ch ess.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Connors, H., et al. (2007). HITS: Health Information Technology Scholars program. http://www.hits-colab.org
   Google Scholar
• Currell, R., et al. (2001). Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Nursing Times 97(35), 35.
   Google Scholar
• Czaja, S. J., et al. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21(2), 333–352.
   Google Scholar
• Czaja, S. J., & Schultz, R. Innovations in technology and aging: Introduction. Generations 30(2), 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Dauz, E., et al. (2004). Installing computers in older adults' homes and teaching them to access a patient education Web site: A systematic approach. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22(5), 266–272.
   Google Scholar
• Davis Kirsch, S. E., & Lewis, F. M. (2004). Using the World Wide Web in health-related intervention research. A review of controlled trials. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22(1), 8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Day, M., et al. (2007). Exploring underutilization of videophones in hospice settings. Telemedicine Journal and E Health 13(1), 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2006, Oct. 29). Online health search 2006. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Internet Project reports, Health. http://www.pewin ternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Online_Health_2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2007, Oct. 8). E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project, Pew Internet Project reports, Health. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/EPatients_Chronic_Conditions_2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., & Rainie, L. (2004 May). Vital decisions: How Internet users decide what information to trust when they or their loved ones are sick. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; Pew Internet Project reports: Health; http://www. pewin ternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Vital_Decisions_May2002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, V. A., et al. (2006). Trends in the use of assistive technology and personal care for late-life disability, 1992–2001. Gerontologist 46(1), 124–127.
   Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E. (2007). eHealth evaluation and dissemination research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 32(suppl. 5), S119–S126.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, D. H., et al. (2002). CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. International Journal of Medical Informatics 65(3), 169–177.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, W. R., et al. (2001a). Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, W. R., et al. (2001b, July). Telemedicine for the Medicare population. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department for Health and Human Services; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Publication No. 01-E012. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat1.chapter.33002
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, W. R., et al. (2006). Diagnosis, access and outcomes: update of a systematic review of telemedicine services. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 12(suppl. 2), S3–S31.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J., et al. (2005). Use of e-health services between 1999 and 2002: A growing digital divide. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 2(2), 164–171.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, B., et al. (2000). Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente Tele-Home Health Research Project. Archives of Family Medicine 9(1), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph Rowntree Foundation. (2007). Introducing smart homes. http://www.jrf.org.uk /housingandcare/smarthomes
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, D. R., & Rockoff, M. L. (2006). Increasing access to online information about health: A program for inner-city elders in community-based organizations. Generations 30(2), 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., et al. (2007, Nov. 16-29). Technology and family caregiving: Advantages and challenges for delivering education, training and support. In The Era of Global Aging: Challenges and Opportunities. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kinney, J. M., & Kart, C. S. (2006). Not quite a panacea: Technology to facilitate family caregiving for elders with dementia. Test of a monitoring system. Generations 30(2), 64–66.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, S., et al. (2003). Internet-enabled interactive multimedia asthma education program: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 111(3), 503–510.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P. (2004). Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: A qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies. BMC Health Servics Research 4(1), 28.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. T. (2006). Existing and emerging healthcare devices for elders to use at home. Novel ways of meeting everyday needs. Generations 30(2), 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, E., et al. (2003). The impact of health information on the Internet on the physician-patient relationship: Patient perceptions. Archives of Internal Medicine 163(14), 1727–1734.
   Google Scholar
• Pare, G., et al. (2007). Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The evidence base. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(3), 269–277.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. E. (2006). Autominder: A case study of assistive technology for elders with cognitive impairment. Generations 30(2), 67–68.
   Google Scholar
• Rialle, V., et al. (2002). Health "smart" home: Information technology for patients at home. Journal of Telemedicine and E Health 8(4), 395–409.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, E. M., et al. 1997). A model for nurse case-managed home care using televideo. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 45(12), 1523–1528.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, R., et al. (2002, Sept.). Technology-based caregiver intervention research: Current status and future directions [Keynote address]. International Conference on Gerontechnology, Miami, FL: International Society for Gerontechnology, p. 15–47. http://www.gerontechnology.info/Journal/Content/Volume_2/nr_1/pdf/15-47.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. E. (2005). Technological home care: Improving caregiving [National Institute of Nursing Research grant]. Kansas City: University of Kansas Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. E., et al. (2002a). Feasibility of in-home telehealth for conducting nursing research. Clinical Nursing Research 11(2), 220–233.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. E., et al. (2002b). Quality assurance processes for designing patient education Web sites. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 20(5), 191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. E., et al. (2006). Telehealth services to improve nonadherence: A placebocontrolled study. Telemedicine Journal and E Health 12(3), 289–296.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanov, D. H., et al. (2004). The smart house for older persons and persons with physical disabilities: Structure, technology arrangements, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 12(2), 228–250.
   Google Scholar
• Stiehl, W. D., et al. (2006, Nov. 3–6.) The design of the Huggable: A therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Caring Machines: AI in eldercare. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC. http://web.media.mit.edu/∼wdstiehl/Publications/FS205StiehlWDtoAppear.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whitten, P. (2006). Telemedicine: Communication technologies that revolutionize healthcare services. Simple applications now, virtual reality and simulation soon. Generations 30(2), 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Whitten, P., et al. (2000). Results of a meta-analysis of cost-benefit research: Is this a question worth asking? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 6(Suppl. 1), S4–S6.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, L. K., et al. (1998). Telecommunication interventions for caregivers of elders with dementia. Advances in Nursing Science 20(3), 76–88.
   Google Scholar