BLENDED LEARNING AS A NEW APPROACH TO SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION

References

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Retrieved october 1, 2007, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Retrieved May 12, 2007, from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending_In.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arabasz, P., Boggs, R., & Baker, M. B. (2003). Highlights of e-learning support practices. Educause Research Bulletin, 2003(9). Boulder, Co: Educause Center for Applied Research. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library /pdf/ERB0309.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ausburn, L. J. (2004). Course design elements most valued by adult learners in blended online education environments: An American perspective. Educational Media International,41, 327–337.
   Google Scholar
• Bellefeuille, G. L. (2006). Rethinking reflective practice education in social work education: A blended constructivist and objectivist instructional design strategy for a Webbased child welfare practice course. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(1), 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Biggerstaff, M. A. (2005). Social work ethics online: Reflective learning. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23(3/4), 245–257.
   Google Scholar
• Birkenmaier, J., Wernet, S. P., Berg-Weger, M., Wilson, R. J., Banks, R., olliges, R., et al. (2005). Weaving a web: The use of Internet technology in field education. Journalof Teaching in Social Work, 25(1/2), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, J. M. (2002). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. Knowledge Net. Retrieved December 19, 2006, from http://www.knowledgenet.com/pdf/Blended_Learning_Design_1028. pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coe, J. A. R., & Elliott, D. (1999). An evaluation of teaching direct practice courses in a distance education program for rural settings. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 353–365.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, V. L. (2002, June). Distance learning instruction:A new model of assessment. Paper presented at the 14th World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Denver, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, V. L. (2003). A model for assessing distance learning instruction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 98–120.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Gabor, P., Coleman, H., & Ing, C. (2002, July). In love with technology: A critical review of the use of technology in social work education. Paper presented at the Ninth International Literacy and Education Research Network Conference on Learning, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K., Owston, R., & Garrison, R. (2004). Blended learning practices at COHERE Universities. Retrieved January 27, 2007, from http://www.yorku.ca/irlt/reports /BLtechnicalreportfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, L., & Hamilton, N. (2000, July). Promoting the social work mission through technology: A critical review of the use of technology in social work education. Paper presented at the ninth international Literacy and Education Research Network Conference on Learning, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B. (2001). Distance Education: A multi-dimensional evaluation. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 18(3/4), 101–115.
   Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J. L., & Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended learning. Educause Research Bulletin, 2004(7). Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://ecam pus.nl.edu/resources/webct/Blended LearningUCFStudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faux, T., & Black-Hughes, c. (2000). A comparison of using the Internet versus lectures to teach social work history. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 454–466.
   Google Scholar
• Freddolino, P. P., & Knaggs, D. G. (2005). Building a predominantly Web-based course from face-to-face and interactive video pilots: Administrative skills for social work practice. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23(3/4), 201–213.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, A. J., & Faul, A. C. (2005). The transition from traditional teaching to Web-assisted technology. Journal of Teaching in Social Work,25(1/2), 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. A., & Floyd, C. E. (2002). Addressing evaluative standards related to program assessment: How do we respond? Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 369–384.
   Google Scholar
• Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/ garnham.htm
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2003). Self-directed learning and distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 161–168). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 113–127). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 94–105.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, C. L., & Sujo de Montes, L. (2001). Effective practices in distance education. Computers in the Schools, 18(2/3), 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, F. C., Resnick, H., & Galea, J. (2002). Better listening: Paraphrasing and perception checking— A study of the effectiveness of a multimedia skills training program. Journal of Technology in Human Services,20(3/4), 317–331.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. M., & Parrish, D. E. (2006). The art of online teaching: Online instruction versus in-class instruction. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 24(2/3), 105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. T., Lockee, B. B., & Oliver, K. M. (2002). Method, media and mode: Clarifying the discussion of distance education effectiveness. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3, 261–268.
   Google Scholar
• Hisle-Gorman, E., & Zuravin, S. (2006). Teaching social work research: A comparison of Web-based and in-class lecture methods. Journal of Technology in Human Services,24(4), 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, S. L., Saba, B., Lindsay, N. K., & Williams, P. B. (2004). Seven strategies for enabling faculty success in distance education. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, M. T. (2000). A comparison study of live instruction versus interactive television for teaching MSW students critical thinking skills. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 400–416.
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, M. (2006). Online versus classroombased instruction: A comparative study of learning outcomes in a diversity course. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 11(2), 102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J., Moore, J., & Marra, R. M. (2003). Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective(2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kaleta, R., skibba, K., & Joosten, T. (2007). Discovering, designing, and delivering hybrid courses. In A. G. Picciano & C. D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended learning: Research perspectives (pp. 111–143). Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, A. (2001). Implementing Web-based learning: Evaluation results from a mental health course. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 18(3/4), 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, A. (2002). E-learning in social work education: Emerging pedagogical and policy issues. Currents:New Scholarship in the Human Services, 1(1). Retrieved June 5, 2007, from http://wcmprod2.ucalgary.ca/currents/files/currents/v1n1_know les.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2006, February). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Paper presented at the academy of Human Resources development (AHRD) International Conference, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Lockee, B. B., Moore, M., & Burton, J. (2002). Measuring success: Evaluation strategies for distance education. Educause Quarterly, 25(1), 20–26. Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0213.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, J. (2006). USING on-line delivery to support students during practicum placements. Australian Social Work, 59(1), 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrotra, C. M., Hollister, C. D., & McGahey, L. (2001). Distance learning: Principles for effective design, delivery, andevaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. A., Walker, J., & Ayala, J. (2003). Technology integration as a transformative catalyst and tool. International Journal of Learning, 10. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://ijl.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.2037/prod.2230
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. W., & King, F. B. (2003). Distance Education: Pedagogy and best practices in the new millennium. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6, 283–297.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. (2004, February). Faculty perceptions of the effectiveness of Web-based instruction in social work education. Paper presented at the 7th annual Technology conference, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). The condition of education: Special analysis 2002: Nontraditional undergraduates. Retrieved January 27, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2002/analyses/nontraditional/index.asp
   Google Scholar
• Olapiriyakul, K., & Scher, J. M. (2006). A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience and a case study. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 287–301.
   Google Scholar
• Osguthorpe, R., & Graham, C. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4, 227–233.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, P., Westhius, D., Marshall, E., & Chang, V. (2006). The acquisition of social work interviewing skills in a Web-based and classroom instructional environment: Results of a study. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 24(4), 53–75.
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Petracchi, H., Mallinger, G., Engel, R., Rishel, C. W., & Washburn, C. (2005). Evaluating the efficacy of traditional and Webassisted instruction in an undergraduate social work practice class. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23(3/4), 299–310.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2006). Blended learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(3), 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, M. K., & Hagan, C. B. (2000). Going the distance: Using systems theory to design, implement, and evaluate a distance education program. Journal of Social Work Education,36, 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Rice-Green, J., & Dumbrill, G. C. (2005). A child welfare course for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students: Pedagogical and technical challenges. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 23(3/4), 167–181.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts-Degennaro, M., & Clapp, J. (2005). Assessing the virtual classroom of a graduate social policy course. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 25(1/2), 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sidell, N. (2006). Teaching an elective online course in gerontology: One BSW program's experience. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 11(2), 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, D. C., Siebert, C. F., & Spaulding-Givens, J. (2006). Teaching clinical social work skills primarily online: An evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. J. (2005). Distance education: Past contributions and possible futures. Distance Education, 26, 159–163.
   Google Scholar
• Trindade, A. R., Carmo, H., & Bidarra, J. (2000). Current developments and best practice in open and distance learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journalon E-Learning, 6(1), 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. R. (2002). "Hybrid" teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(22), A33–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? a practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836–1884.
   Google Scholar