651
Views
43
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

FACILITATING DISSERTATION COMPLETION AND SUCCESS AMONG DOCTORAL STUDENTS IN SOCIAL WORK

, &
Pages 481-497 | Published online: 16 Mar 2013

References

  • Anastas, J. W., & Kuerbis, A. N. (2009). Doctoral education in social work: What we know and what we need to know. Social Work, 54(1), 71–81.
  • Burnett, P. C. (1999). The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model. Counselor Education & Super vision, 39(1), 46–52.
  • Callan, P. M. (2002). Executive Summary. Coping with recession: Public policy, economic downturns, and higher education. National Center for Public Policy and Higher education. Retrieved April 14, 2009, from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/cwrecession/cwrecession1.shtml
  • Carter-Black, J. (2008). A black woman's journey into a predominately white academic world. Affilia, 23(2), 112–122.
  • Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). (2006). The university as mentor: Lessons learned from UMBC inclusiveness initiatives. Retrieved april 25, 2009, from http://www.cgsnet.org
  • Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). (2008). Ph.d. completion Project. retrieved April 25, 2009, from http://Www.phdcompletion.org
  • Council on Social Work Education. (2006). 2006 Statistics on social work education in the United States: A summary. Alexandria, VA: author.
  • D'Andrea, L. M. (2002). Obstacles to completion of the doctoral degree in college of education: The professors' perspective. Educational Research Quarterly, 25(3), 42–58.
  • Di Pierro, M. (2007). Excellence in doctoral education: Defining best practices. College Student Journal, 41(2), 368–375.
  • Dong,Y. E. (1998). Non-native graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing in science: Self-reports by students and their advisors from two U.S. institutions. English for Specific Purpose, 17(4), 369–390.
  • Gatfield, T. (2005). An investigation into Phd supervisory management styles: Development of a dynamic conceptual model and its managerial implications. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(3), 311–325.
  • Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669–700.
  • Gordon, P. J. (2003). Advising to avoid or to cope with dissertation hang-ups. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(2), 181–187.
  • Green, K. E. (1997). Psychosocial factors affecting dissertation completion. in L. F. Good child, K. E. green, E. L. Katz, & R. C. Kluever (Eds.), Rethinking the dissertation pro cess (pp. 57–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Grinstein-Weiss, M. (2006). Funding opportunities for social work doctoral students through the U.S. department of Housing and Urban development. Research on Social Work Practice, 16, 632–637.
  • Hare, I. (2004). Defining social work for the 21st century: The international Federation of Social Workers' revised definition of social work. International Social Work, 47, 407–424.
  • Harland, T. (2003). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and problem-based learning: Linking a theoretical concept with practice through action research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(2), 263–272.
  • Hasse, C. (2001). Institutional creativity: The relational zone of proximal development. Culture & Psychology, 7(2), 199–221.
  • Johnson, E. M., Green, K. E., & Kluver, R. C. (2000). Psychometric characteristics of the revised procrastination inventory. Research in Higher Education, 41(2), 269–279.
  • Johnson, R. W., & Conyers, L. M. (2001). Surviving the doctoral dissertation: A solution-focused approach. Journal of College Counseling, 4, 77–80.
  • Johnson, W. B. (2002). The intentional mentor: Strategies and guidelines for the practices of mentoring. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(1), 88–96.
  • Kluever, R. C., & Green, K. E. (1998). The Responsibility Scale: A research note on dissertation completion. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(3), 520–531.
  • Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, VA: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good coursetaker is not enough: A theoretical per spective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–154.
  • Lovitts, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from PhD programs. Academe, 86(6), 44–50.
  • Lubben, J., & Harootyan, L. K. (2002). Strength ening geriatric social work through a doctoral fellowship program. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 39(1/2), 145–156.
  • McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: An integrative framework for action and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 3–17.
  • Paultridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A hand book for supervisors. New York: Routledge.
  • Ponticell, J. A., & Olivarez, A. (1997). Dissertation quality and Kerlinger's methods myth. Journal of Experimental Education, 65(2), 113–122.
  • Riebschleger, J. (2001). Writing a dissertation: Lessons learned. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 82, 579–582.
  • Sowell, R. (2008). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline data. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools. Retrieved April 25, 2009, from http://www.cgsnet.org/portals/0/pdf/Phdc_demographic_data_and_analysis.pdf
  • Spillett, M. A., & Moisiewicz, K. A. (2004). Cheerleader, coach, counselor, critic: Support and challenge roles of the dissertation advisor. College Student Journal, 38(2), 246–256.
  • Strachan, R., Murray, R., & Grierson, H. (2004). A web-based tool for dissertation writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 369–375.
  • University of Maryland. (2009). The graduate School. Ph.D. Completion Workshops. Retrieved April 24, 2009, from http://www.gradschool.umd.edu/grrd/workshops/
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.