FIELD EDUCATION AS THE SIGNATURE PEDAGOGY OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION

References

• Bargagliotti, L. A. (2006). Taking the risks of eagles. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(6), 294.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, P., & Sutphen, M. (2007). Learning across the professions: The clergy, a case in point. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(3), 103–108.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, P., & Sutphen, M. (2009). Study of nursing education. Stanford, CA: Carneg ie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M. (2005). Field instruction in social work: A review of the research literature 1999–2005. Clinical Supervisor, 24(1/2), 163–193.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & Globerman, J. (1995). Creating effective university–field partnerships: An analysis of two inter-organization models for field education. Journal of Teach ing in Social Work, 11(1/2), 177–192.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & Globerman, J. (1999). Interorganizational relationships between schools of social work and field agencies: Testing a framework for analysis. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 265–274.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Globerman, J., & Sussman, T. (2004a). The field instructor as group worker: Managing trust and competition in group supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Globerman, J., & Sussman, T. (2004b). Field instructor competence in group supervision: Students' views. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(1/2), 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & Vayda, E. (1998). The practice of field instruction in social work: Theory and process (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caspi, J., & Reid, W. J. (2002). Educational supervision in social work. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., & Kaye, L. (2002). Learning opportunities in field practica: Iden tifying skills and activities associated with MSW students' self-evaluation of performance and satisfaction. Clinical Supervisor, 21, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E., McCarthy, M., & Abramson, J. S. (2001). Student learning processes in field education: Relationship of learning activities to quality of field instruction, satisfaction, and performance among MSW students. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. R., Dahill, L., Golemon, L., & Wang, B. (2005a). Educating clergy: Teaching practices and the pastoral imagination. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. R., Dahill, L., Golemon, L., & Wang, B. (2005b). Educating clergy: Teaching practices and the pastoral imagination. [Media summary.] San Francisco, CA: Carnegie Foun dation for the Advancement of Teaching
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2001). Evaluating the quality of social work education: Options galore. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 418–429.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, C. R. (2004). Anxiety experienced by foundation-year MSW students entering field placement: Implications for admissions, curriculum, and field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. (1982). A history of social work field instruction. In B. W. Sheafor & L. E. Jenkins (Eds.), Quality field instruction in social work (pp. 37–59). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, C. O., Finch, J. B., & Franks, C. L. (2005). Learning to teach, teaching to learn. Alexandria, VA: CSWE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ironside, P. (2006). Reforming doctoral curricula in nursing: Creating multiparadigmatic, multipedagogical researchers. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(2), 51–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jarman-Rohde, L., McFall, J., Kolar, P., & Strom, G. (1997). The changing context of social work practice: Implications and recommendations for social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2000). Engaging the student in the field instruction relationship: BSW and MSW students' views. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 20(3/4), 173–201.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students' views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 357–379.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. Chicago, IL: Association Press/Follett.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lager, P. B., & Robbins, V. C. (2004). Field education: Exploring the future, expanding the vision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, J. (2000). Methods used to teach social work students in the field: A research report from New Zealand. Social Work Education, 19, 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Mumm, A. M. (2006). Teaching social work students practice skills. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26(3/4), 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. (Ed.). (1989). Empirical studies in field instruction. New York, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. S., Wayne, J., & Bogo, M. (2008). Revisiting field education standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 173–188.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, G., & McDonald, P. L. (1995). Expedience over education: Teaching methods used by field instructors. Clinical Supervisor, 13(2), 41–65.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005a). Pedagogies of uncertainty. Liberal Education, 91(2), 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005b). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005c). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Irvine, CA: National Research Council Center for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, W. M., Colby, A., Wegner, J. W., Bond, L., & Shulman, L. S. (2007). Educating lawyers: Preparation for the profession of law. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Teigiser, K. (2009). Field note— New approaches to generalist field education. Jour nal of Social Work Education, 45, 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J. (1988). A comparison of beliefs about student supervision between micro and macro practitioners. Clinical Supervisor, 6(3/4), 271–297.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2006). Field note—The need for radical change in field education. Jour nal of Social Work Education, 42, 161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., & Cohen, C. S. (2001). Group work education in the field. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Whitcomb, M. E., & Nutter, D. (2002). Learning medicine in the 21st century: A background paper commissioned in 2002 for Carnegie's medical education study. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnberg, M. H., & Schwartz, M. C. (1977). Models of student supervision: The apprentice, growth, and role systems models. Journal of Education for Social Work, 13(3), 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Zosky, D. L., Unger, J. M., White, K., & Mills, S. J. (2003). Non-traditional and traditional social work students: Perceptions of field instructors. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23(3/4), 185–201.
   Google Scholar