FIELD INSTRUCTORS AND ONLINE TRAINING: AN EXPLORATORY SURVEY

References

• Bedard, L. E. (1998). A national survey of social work field placement directors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(3), 955. (UMI No. 9827634)
   Google Scholar
• Cascio, T., & Gasker, J. (2001). Everyone has a shining side: Computer-mediated mentoring in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 283–294.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, P. A., & Mamary, E. M. (2002). New choices for continuing education: A statewide survey of the practices and preferences of nurse practitioners. Journal of Contin u ing Education in Nursing, 33(2), 88–91.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from www.cswe.org/Accreditation/41865.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., & Huff, M. (2001). Using technology in a social work diversity course. Journal of Technology for Human Services (Special Issue), 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, A., Faul, A., & Yankelov, P. (2003). Student perceptions of Web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 443–457.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, J. V. (2001). Empowerment in social work field education: Examining the triadic aspects of empowerment in the education process of the social work field student. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(7), 2571. (UMI No. 3019518)
   Google Scholar
• Globerman, J., & Bogo, M. (2003). Changing times: Understanding social workers' motivation to be field instructors. Social Work, 48, 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, C. O., Finch, J. B., & Franks, C. L. (2005). Learning to teach, teaching to learn: A guide for social work field education. Alexandria, VA: Council of Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2001). The process of field instruction: BSW and MSW students' views of effective field supervision. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 357–379.
   Google Scholar
• Kolar, P., Reeser, L. C., & Conroy, K. (2003, March). Traditional field education models: A goodness of fit for the twenty-first century? Paper presented at CSWE's Annual Program Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education. New York, NY: Adult Education Co.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, L., & Stretch, J. (2000). How hypermodern technology in social work education bites back. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, M. (1998). Agency-based social work field instructor orientation and training. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(2), 551. (UMI No. 9918956)
   Google Scholar
• McFall, J., & Freddolino, P. (2000). Quality and comparability in distance field education: Lessons learned from comparing three program sites. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 293–307.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. A. (2003). Faculty perception of the effectiveness of Web-based instruction in social work education: An exploratory study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(12), 4627. (UMI No. 3007576)
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, D., & Conceiçáo-Runlee, S. (2000). Designing a faculty development program on technology: If you build it, will they come? Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 325–334.
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: A profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, M., & Hagan, D. (2003). Going the distance: Using systems theory to design, implement, and evaluate a distance education program. Journal of Social Work Education, 36, 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. (1994). The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Ravid, R. (2000). Practical statistics for educators (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, G., Smith, W., & Peterson, V. (1992). Field instructor benefits in education: A national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, 363–369.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., & Furlong, J. (2006). Adult learning in the digital age: Information technology and the learning society. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Short, G. F. (2001). Learning, teaching, and supervisory styles in field education: The working alliance investigated. Disserta – tion Abstracts International, 62(7), 2573. (UMI No. 3020980)
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest, D., Canon, R., & Grant, D. (2000). Using an interactive website to educate about cultural diversity and societal oppression. Journal of Social Work Education, 37, 463–479.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2006). The need for radical change in field education. Jour nal of Social Work Education, 42, 161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Weinbach, R. W., & Grinnell, R. M., Jr. (2004). Statistics for social workers (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson, G. K., Marsom, G., & Magnuson, C. W. (2005). Changing the nature of the discourse: Teaching field seminars online. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 355–361.
   Google Scholar
• York, R. O. (2008). Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 157–172.
   Google Scholar