GATEKEEPING IN FIELD PERFORMANCE: IS GRADE INFLATION A GIVEN?

References

• Barlow, C., & Coleman, H. (2003). Suitability for practice guidelines for students: A survey of Canadian social work programmes. Social Work Education, 22, 142–164.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Power, R., Regehr, C., Globerman, J., & Hughes, J. (2002). Evaluating a measure of student field performance in direct service: Testing reliability and validity of explicit criteria. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 385–401.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Power, R., Hughes, J., Woodford, M., & Regehr, G. (2004). Toward new approaches for evaluating student field performance: Tapping the implicit criteria used by experienced field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 417–426.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, D., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2006a, February). Improving measures of social work performance in the field. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Woodford, M., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2006b). Beyond competencies: Field instructors' descriptions of student performance. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 579–594.
   Google Scholar
• Born, C. E., & Carroll, D. (1988). Ethics in admissions. Journal of Social Work Education, 23, 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, B. S., & Lewis, R. G. (1993). Gatekeeping through termination of unsuitable social work students: Legal issues and guidelines. Journal of Social Work Education, 29, 150–160.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/41865.aspx
   Google Scholar
• de Vaus, D. (2002). Analyzing social science data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dudek, N. L., Marks, M. B., & Regehr, G. (2005). Failure to fail: The perspective of clinical supervisors. Academic Medicine, 80, 584–587.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E. (2003). Comparison of faculty ratings of applicants and background characteristics as predictors of performance in an MSW program. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23, 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. A., & Floyd, C. E. (2002). Addressing evaluative standards related to program assessment: How do we respond? Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 369–382.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., & Macy, H. J. (2000). Introduction: The arena of gatekeeping. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW Programs (pp. 107–134). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Meenaghan, T., & Anastas, J. (2003). Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives: Evidence for the use of self-efficacy as an outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 425–440.
   Google Scholar
• Kindle, P. A., & Colby, I. (2008). School selection preferences of public and private university MSW students: A retrospective study. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 97–113.
   Google Scholar
• LaFrance, J., Gray, E., & Herbert, M. (2004). Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. Social Work Education, 23, 325–340.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, T. (2007). Statistics on social work education in the U.S.: 2004. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Koerin, B. (2001). Gatekeeping in the practicum: What field instructors need to know. The Clinical Supervisor, 20, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp-Paglicci, L., Allen, S., Cabness, J., Ersing, R. (2006, February). Counseling out social work students: Are we prepared to carry out gatekeeping? Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. (1994). The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. S., Wayne, J., & Bogo, M. (2008). Revisiting field education standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 173–188.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings, M. (2007, October). Objective structured clinical exams for assessment: Issues in design, reliability and validity. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (1999). Social work values and ethics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regehr, G., Bogo, M., Regehr, C., & Power, R. (2007). Can we build a better mousetrap? Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 327–344.
   Google Scholar
• Regehr, C., Stalker, C., Jacobs, M., & Pelech, W. (2001). The gatekeeper and the wounded healer. The Clinical Supervisor, 20, 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2001). Research Methods for Social Work (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., McCormick, J., & Cleak, H. (2006). Student performance in field education placements: The findings of a 6-year Australian study of admissions data. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 67–84.
   Google Scholar
• Samec, J. R. (1995). Shame, guilt, and trauma: Fail ing the psychotherapy candidate's clinical work. The Clinical Supervisor, 13, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sowbel, L. R. (2008, November). Gatekeeping: Why shouldn't we be ambivalent? Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, D. P. (2004). Field education: Exploring the future, expanding the vision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 3–11.
   Google Scholar