Gatekeeping: Why Shouldn't we be Ambivalent?

References

• Americans With Disabilities Act of 1190, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12101 et seq. (West 1993).
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, C., & Coleman, H. (2003). Suitability for practice guidelines for students: A survey of Canadian social work programmes. Social Work Education, 22, 142-164.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Power, R., Regehr, C., Globerman, J., & Hughes, J. (2002). Evaluating a measure of student field performance in direct service: Testing reliability and validity of explicit criteria. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 385-401.
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., Regehr, C., Woodford, M., Hughes, J., Power, R., & Regehr, G. (2006). Beyond competencies: Field instructors' descriptions of student performance. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 579-593.
   Google Scholar
• Bogol-Allbritten, R., & Allbritten, B. (2000). Psychological testing as a tool in assessing undergraduate students for admission to a baccalaureate social work program. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 293-307). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Born, C. E., & Carroll, D. (1988). Ethics in admissions. Journal of Social Work Education, 23, 69-74.
   Google Scholar
• Bracy, W. D. (2000). Gatekeeping in social work education: Achieving diversity and excellence. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 73-106). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buccino, D. (2008, Spring). Ethics and supervision. Bulletin of BSWE. Retrieved from http://dhmh.maryland.gov/bswe/Adobe/Newsletters/Spring2008.pdf http://dhmh.maryland.gov/bswe/Adobe/Newsletters/Spring2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, N. H. (1994). Court-recommended guidelines for managing unethical students and working with university lawyers. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 18-31.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, N. H., & Jordan, C. (1989). Students with questionable values or threatening behavior: Precedent or policy from discipline to dismissal. Journal of Social Work Education, 25, 87-97.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, B. S. (1991). Legal issues related to social work program admissions. Journal of Social Work Education, 27, 18-25.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, B., Christ, C., & Light, T. (1995). Social work education and students with disabilities: Implications of Section 504 and ADA. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 261-268.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, B. S., & Lewis, R. G. (1993). Gatekeeping through termination of unsuitable social work students: Legal issues and guidelines. Journal of Social Work Education, 29, 150-160.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/2008EPASDescription.aspx http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/2008EPASDescription.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2010). Accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation.aspx http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Currer, C., & Atherton, K. (2008). Suitable to remain a student social worker? Decision making in relation to termination of training. Social Work Education, 27, 279-292.
   Google Scholar
• Deal, K. H. (1999). The effects of student caretaking history on clinical performance. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 70, 47-68.
   Google Scholar
• Dudek, N. L., Marks, M. B., & Regehr, G. (2005). Failure to fail: The perspective of clinical supervisors. Academic Medicine, 80, 584-587.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L. (1980). Helping people: The task-centered approach. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, A. E. (2003). Comparison of faculty ratings of applicants and background characteristics as predictors of performance in an MSW program. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 23, 35-54.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. (1998). An essay on mutuality and parallel process in field instruction. Clinical Supervisor, 17, 59-73.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. A., & Floyd, C. E. (2002). Addressing evaluative standards related to program assessment: How do we respond? Journal of Social work Education, 38, 369-382.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P. (1994). Screening mechanisms in BSW programs. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 63-75.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., & Macy, H. J. (2000). Introduction: The arena of gatekeeping. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 107-134). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman, U., & Robbins, V. C. (2007). Letters to the editor. Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 161-162.
   Google Scholar
• GlenMaye, L. F., & Bolin, B. (2007). Students with psychiatric disabilities: An exploratory study of program practices. Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 117-131.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, G. (1954). Self-awareness in professional education. Social Casework, 35, 371-379.
   Google Scholar
• Haski-Leventhal, D., Gelles, R. J., & Cnaan, R. A. (2010). Admitting convicted felons to social work programs: Conceptual dilemmas and practices. International Social Work, 53, 87-100.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, G., Meenaghan, T., & Anastas, J. (2003). Determining attainment of the EPAS foundation program objectives: Evidence for the use of self- efficacy as an outcome. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 425-440.
   Google Scholar
• Kindle, P. A., & Colby, I. (2008). School selection preferences of public and private university MSW students: A retrospective study. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 97-113.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C. (2004). Modeling professionalism and supervising interns. In M. J. Austin & K. H. Hopkins (Eds.), Supervision as collaboration in the human services (pp. 110-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Koerin, B., & Miller, J. (1995). Gatekeeping policies: Terminating students for nonacademic reasons. Journal of Social Work Education, 31, 247-261.
   Google Scholar
• LaFrance, J., Gray, E., & Herbert, M. (2004). Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. Social Work Education, 23, 325-340.
   Google Scholar
• Lager, B. P., & Robbins, V. C. (2004). Guest editorial—Field education: Exploring the future, expanding the vision. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 3-11.
   Google Scholar
• Leighninger, L. (2000). Creating a new profession. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons-Ruth, K., Dutra, L., Schuder, M. R., & Bianchi, I. (2006). From infant attachment disorganization to adult dissociation: Relational adaptations or traumatic experiences? Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 29, 63-86.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, R. G. (2000a). Creating a bridging environment: The screening- in process in BSW programs. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 135-148). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, R. G. (2000b). Disability law and undergraduate social work education: Practicing what we preach. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 195-211). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, R. G., & Cobb, N. H. (2000). Legal issues facing social work academia. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 171-194). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Koerin, B. (1998). Can we assess suitability at admission? A review of MSW application procedures. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 437-453.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Koerin, B. (2001). Gatekeeping in the practicum: What field instructors need to know. Clinical Supervisor, 20, 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, L. S., & Jenkins, D. A. (2000). The history of gatekeeping. In P. Gibbs & E. H. Blakely (Eds.), Gatekeeping in BSW programs (pp. 45-59). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, L. S., & Urwin, C. A. (1991). Gatekeeping: A model for screening baccalaureate students for field education. Journal of Social work Education, 27, 8-17.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Petrovich, A. (2004). Teaching note—Using self-efficacy theory in social work teaching. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 429-443.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, C. (2005, January). Perceptions of field instruction: The practicum instructor evaluation form (PIEF) validation study. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Social Work Research, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp-Paglicci, L., Allen, S., Cabness, J., & Ersing, R. (2006, February). Counseling out social work students: Are we prepared to carry out gatekeeping? Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M. (1994). The Delphi Study in Field Instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 75-93.
   Google Scholar
• Raskin, M., Bogo, M., & Wayne, J. (2008). Revisiting field education standards. Journal of Social Work Education, 44, 173-188.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings, M. (2007). Objective structured clinical exams fir assessment: Issues in design, reliability and validity. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. (1995). Malpractice claims against social workers: First facts. Social Work, 40, 595-601.
   Google Scholar
• Regehr, G., Bogo, M., Regehr, C., & Power, R. (2007). Can we build a better mousetrap? Journal of Social Work Education, 43, 327-344.
   Google Scholar
• Regehr, C., Stalker, C., Jacobs, M., & Pelech, W. (2001). The gatekeeper and the wounded healer. Clinical Supervisor, 20, 127-143.
   Google Scholar
• Regehr, C., Regehr, G., Leeson, J., & Fusco, L. (2002). Setting priorities for learning in the field practicum: A comparative study of students and field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 55-65.
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, R., Ward, J., Ligon, J., & Priddy, W. (1999). Fighting for field: Seven threats to an important component of social work education. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 5, 15-25
   Google Scholar
• Rishel, C. W., & Majewski, V. (2009). Student gains in self- efficacy in an advanced MSW curriculum: A customized model for outcomes assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 365-383.
   Google Scholar
• Rompf, E. L., & Royse, D. (1994). Choice of social work as a career: Possible influences. Journal of Social Work Education, 30, 163-175.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., McCormick, J., & Cleak, H. (2006). Student performance in field education placements: The findings of a 6-year Australian study of admissions data. Journal of Social Work Education, 42, 67-84.
   Google Scholar
• Samec, J. R. (1995). Shame, guilt, and trauma: Failing the psychotherapy candidate's clinical work. Clinical Supervisor, 13, 1-17.
   Google Scholar
• Schottler, T. E. (2005). Defining and evaluating non-academic (in) competence and personal (un)suitability in clinical training: Exploring the role of personality and interpersonal skills. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(7-B), 3723.
   Google Scholar
• Sowbel, L. R. (2011). Field note—Gatekeeping in field performance: Is grade inflation a given? Journal of Social Work Education, 47, 367-377.
   Google Scholar
• Sowbel, L. R. (2008, November). Gatekeeping: Why shouldn't we be ambivalent? Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Sowbel, L. R. (2009, November). Personality traits predictive of field performance for foundation year MSW students. Paper presented at the Annual Program Meeting of the Council on Social Work Education, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Strom-Gottfried, K. (2003). Understanding adjudication: Origins, targets, and outcomes of ethics complaints. Social Work, 48, 85-94.
   Google Scholar
• Strom-Gottfried, K., & D'Aprix, A. (2006). Ethics for academics. Social Work Education, 25, 225-244.
   Google Scholar
• Stromwell, L. K. (2002). Is social work's door open to people recovering from psychiatric disabilities? Social Work, 47, 75-83.
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, M. (2004). Monkey see, monkey do: A critique of the competency model in graduate medical education. Medical Education, 38, 587-592.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, D. M. Y., & Coleman, H. (2009). Construction and validation of a professional suitability scale for social work practice. Journal of Social work Education, 45, 47-63.
   Google Scholar
• Vacha-Haase, T., Davenport, D. S., & Kerewsky, S. D. (2004). Problematic students: Gatekeeping practices of academic professional psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 115-122.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, R. H. (2004). Legal guidelines for dismissing students because of poor performance in the field. Journal of Social Work Education, 40, 403-414.
   Google Scholar
• Winicott, D. W. (1971). Therapeutic consultations in child psychiatry. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zakutansky T. J., & Sirles, E. A. (1993). Ethical and legal issues in field education: Shared responsibility and risk. Journal of Social Work Education, 29, 338-348.
   Google Scholar