- Lord Neuberger, ‘Law Reporting and the Doctrine of Precedent: The Past the Present and the Future' in Halsbury's Laws of England Centenary Essays (LexisNexis 2007) 71.
- Osakue v Federal College of Education (2010) 3 NMLR (Pt II) 319 (Supreme Court of Nigeria (SCN)) [15].
- Cassell v Broome [1972] AC 1027 (House of Lords (HL)) 1053–54, as noted in Niki Tobi, Sources of Nigerian Law (MIJ Professional Publishers 1996) 89.
- Lord Neuberger, ‘Law Reporting’ (n 1) 70.
- ibid 72.
- Slater v May (1704) 1 Ld Raym 1071, 1072 (Court of King's Bench).
- Keighley v Durant [1901] AC 240 (HL) 248.s
- <www.bailii.org> accessed 31 October 2012.
- Quinn v Leathem [1901] AC 495 (HL) 506.
- Lupton v FA & AB Ltd [1972] AC 634 (HL) 658.
- (1998) 3 NWLR (Pt 80) 109; cited in Tobi (n 3) 84.
- (1867) LR2Ex 259, 265 (Court of Exchequer Chamber).
- [1912] AC 716 (HL).
- [1982] 3 All ER 394 (HL).
- Bremer Vulkan v South India Shipping Corpn [1981] AC 909 (HL).
- [1983] 1 All ER 34 (HL).
- Note that the Bremer Vulkan and Paal Wilson decisions were ultimately modifed by the Arbitration Act 1950, s 13A, added with effect from 1 January 1992 by the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.
- Buhari & Ors v Obasanjo & Ors (2003) 11 SC 1 (SCN) 124 (Pats—Acholonu JSC).
- [1969] 1 AC 191(HL).
- ibid 231–32, 244, 286 (Lord Reid, Lord Morris and Lord Upjohn).
- [1980] AC 198 (HL).
- ibid 212–13.
- [2000] 3 All ER 673 (HL).
- Practice Statement (Judicial Precedent) [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (HL).
- Kay v Lambeth LBC [2006] UKHL 10 (HL) [42].
- Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944] KB 718 (England and Wales Court of Appeal (EWCA)).
- ibid 99–101.
- Tobi (n 3) 400.
- Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1971] AC 1004 (HL) 1015.
- Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2006] EWCA Civ 1739 (EWCA Civ) (Tuckey and Neuberger LJ J).
- Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10 (HL).
- Lambert v Lewis [1982] AC 225 (HL) 274. See also Pioneer Shipping Ltd v BTP Tioxide Ltd [1981] 2 All ER 1030 (HL) 1046 (Lord Roskill with whom the other Law Lords agreed on the point).
- Cited in R v Erskine [2009] EWCA Crim 1425 (EWCA Crim) [73] (as part of a series of quotations on the same theme over more than 100 years).
- Michaels v Taylor Woodrow [2001] Ch 493 (High Court, Chancery Division).
- Erskine (n 33) [75].
- Nedlloyd Lines UK Ltd & Ors v Cel Group Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 1716 (EWCA Civ) [23]–[26].
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.