- Ronald Dworkin, Religion without God (Harvard University Press, 2013) 4.
- Bernard S Cohn, ‘From Indian Status to British Contract’ (1961) 21 Journal of Economic History 616; MN Srinivas, ‘The Dominant Caste in Rampura’ (1959) 61 American Anthropologist (new series) 4–7.
- Richard W Lariviere, ‘Justices and Panditas: Some Ironies in Contemporary Readings of the Hindu Legal Past’ (1989) 48 Journal of Asian Studies 760.
- Ibid, 760.
- Jones cited Ibid, 761.
- David Skuy, ‘Macaulay and the Indian Penal Code of 1862: The Myth of the Inherent Superiority and Modernity of the English Legal System Compared to India's Legal System in the Nineteenth Century’ (1998) 32 Modern Asian Studies 513, 517.
- Victoria of the United Kingdom, Proclamation by the Queen in Council, to the Princes, Chiefs, and People of India (1858), http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Queen_Victoria%27s_Proclamation.
- Report of the Maharaj Libel Case, and of the Bhattia Conspiracy Case Connected with It (Bombay Gazette Press, 1862) 1–3.
- Theodore Goldstucker, Literary Remains of the Late Professor Theodore Goldstucker, vol II (WH Allen, 1879) 52.
- David L Haberman, ‘On Trial: The Love of the Sixteen Thousand Gopees’ (1993) 33 History of Religions 45–46.
- Report of the Maharaj Libel Case Libel Case (n 8) 30.
- Ibid, 93–123.
- Ibid, 124–8.
- Ibid, 213.
- Ibid, 233–4.
- Ibid,109, 206.
- KG Balakrishnan, ‘Individual Rights in India: A Perspective from the Supreme Court’ (2009), http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/speeches/speeches_2009/presentation_at_roundtable_-_university_of_georgia.pdf.
- Marc Galanter, ‘The Aborted Restoration of “Indigenous” Law in India’ (1972) 14 Comparative Studies in Society and History 55.
- Ronojoy Sen, ‘Legalizing Religion: The Indian Supreme Court and Secularism’ (2007) 30 Policy Studies, www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/stored/pdfs/PS030.pdf.
- Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt (1954): 1954 AIR (All India Reporter) SC 282, 1954 1 SCR 1005. (Note: Indian Supreme Court judgments accessed via the government's Judgment Information System, http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/chejudis.asp; the legal search engine Indian Kanoon www.indiankanoon.org provides clearer citations and better transcripts of the judgments.)
- Sen (n 19) 9.
- Durgah Committee, Ajmer v Syed Hussain Ali and Others (1961): 1961 AIR 1402, 1962 SCR (1) 383.
- CJ Fuller, ‘Hinduism and Scriptural Authority in Modern Indian Law’ (1988) 30 Comparative Studies in Society and History 225.
- Marc Galanter, ‘Hinduism, Secularism, and the Indian Judiciary’ (1971) 21 Philosophy East and West 474.
- Sastri Yagnapurushadji and Others v Muldas Bhundardas Vaishya and Others (1966): 1966 AIR SC 1119, 1966 SCR (3) 242.
- Shirur Mutt (n 20).
- Lariviere (n 3) 757, 767; Fuller (n 23) 246; Sen (n 19) 10.
- Sen (n 19) 6.
- Balakrishnan (n 17) 2.
- Fuller (n 23) 228, 236.
- Balakrishnan (n 17) 21.
- Brian K Smith, ‘How Not to Be a Hindu: The Case of the Ramakrishna Mission’ in Robert D Baird (ed), Religion and Law in Independent India (Manohar, 1993) 338.
- Sanjeev Nayyar, ‘Why Did the Ramakrishna Mission Say they Are Not Hindus?’, esamskriti.com (2002), www.esamskriti.com/essay-chapters/Why-did-the-Ramakrishna-Mission-say-theyare-not-Hindus-1.aspx.
- MD McLean, ‘Are Ramakrishnaites Hindus? Some Implications of Recent Litigation on the Question’ (1991) 14 South Asia 100; Gwilym Beckerlegge, The Ramakrishna Mission: The Making of a Modern Hindu Movement (Oxford University Press, 2000) 62.
- Cited in Bramchari Sidheswar Shai and Others v State of West Bengal (1995): 1995 AIR 2089, 1995 SCC (4) 646.
- McLean (n 34) 114.
- Ibid, 104.
- Beckerlegge (n 34) 63.
- Bramchari Sidheswar Shai and Others v State of West Bengal (1995): 1995 AIR 2089, 1995 SCC (4) 646.
- Sri Aurobindo, Autobiographical Notes and Other Writings of Historical Interest (Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 2006) 531.
- The Mother (Mira Alfassa), Words of the Mother I (Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1980) 210.
- Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations of Sri Aurobindo Society (1960), 5.
- Robert N Minor, The Religious, the Spiritual and the Secular: Auroville and Secular India (SUNY Press, 1999) 70–71.
- Ibid, 72–73.
- Ibid, 75, 82–83.
- Memorandum of Association and Rules and Regulations (n 42) 9.
- SP Mittal Etc Etc v Union of India and Others (1983): 1983 AIR 1, 1983 SCR (1) 729.
- The Mother (Mira Alfassa), Mother's Agenda, vol 10 (Mira Aditi Centre, 1998) 498.
- Sri Aurobindo, The Human Cycle (Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1997) 177–8.
- Ibid, 177.
- SP Mittal Etc (n 47).
- Ibid.
- Ibid.
- Minor (n 43) 76.
- Balakrishnan (n 17) 20.
- Sen (n 19) 10.
- Sastri Yagnapurushadji (n 25).
‘Not a Question of Theology’? Religions, Religious Institutions, and the Courts in India
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.