Malaysia's Transitional Moment?

References

• AbbottJ. P. (2001), ‘Vanquishing Banquo's ghost: The Anwar Ibrahim affair and its impact on Malaysian politics’, Asian Studies Review, Vol 25, No 3, September, pp 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• AbbottJ. GregoriosS. (2009), ‘Islamization in Malaysia: Dakwah, design and dynamics’, unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• AbbottJ. P. FranksO. (2007), ‘Malaysia at fifty: Conflicting definitions of citizenship’, Asian Affairs, Vol XXXVIII, No III, November, pp 337–356.
   Google Scholar
• AlmondG. (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• AlmondG. A. ColemanJ. S. (1960), The Politics of the Developing Areas, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• AlmondG. PowellG. B. (1966), Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach, Little, Brown and Co, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• BarracloughS. (1985), ‘The dynamics of coercion in the Malaysian political process’, Modern Asian Studies, Vol 19, No 4, pp 797–822.
   Google Scholar
• BellD. A. BrownD. JayasuriyaK. (1995), Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia, Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• BrownG. (2008), ‘Federal and state elections in Malaysia, March 2008’, Electoral Studies, Vol 27, No 4, December, pp 740–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BryantC. G. A. (1993), ‘Civic nation, civil society, civil religion’, in HallJ., ed, Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• CarothersT. (2002), ‘The end of the transition paradigm’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 13, No 1, January, pp 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaseW. (1993), ‘Semi-democracy in Malaysia: Withstanding the pressures for regime change,’ Pacific Affairs, Vol 66, No 2, pp 183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaseW. (1996), ‘UMNO paramountcy: A report on single-party dominance in Malaysia’, Party Politics, Vol 2, No 1, pp 115–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaseW. (1997a), ‘1996 UMNO party election: Two for the show’, Pacific Affairs, Vol 7, No 3, pp 393–411.
   Google Scholar
• CaseW. (1997b), ‘Malaysia: Still the semi-democratic paradigm’, Asian Studies Review, Vol 21, No 2–3, pp 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• CaseW. (2002), Politics in Southeast Asia, Curzon, Richmond.
   Google Scholar
• CaseW. (2006), ‘Manipulative skills: How do rulers control the electoral arena?’ in SchedlerA., ed, Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Lynne Reinner, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• ChinJ. (1997), ‘Malaysia in 1996: Mahathir–Anwar bouts, UMNO election, and Sarawak surprise’, Asian Survey, Vol 37, No 2, pp 181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChristieK. RoyD. (2001), Politics of Human Rights in East Asia, Pluto Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• CollierD. LevitskyS. (1997), ‘Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research’, World Politics, Vol 49, No 3, pp 430–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrouchH. (1993), ‘Malaysia: Neither authoritarian nor democratic’, in HewisonK. RobisonR. RodanG., eds, Southeast Asia in the 1990s, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• DahlR. A. (1998), On Democracy, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
   Google Scholar
• DiamondL. (1996), ‘Is the Third Wave over?’ Journal of Democracy, Vol 7, April, p 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoganM. HigleyJ. (1998), Elites, Crises and the Origins of Regimes, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
   Google Scholar
• DonnellG. SchmitterP. WhiteheadL., eds (1986), Transitions From Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for Democracy, Part 4, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• DoorenspleetR. (2005), Democratic Transitions: Exploring the Structural Sources of the Fourth Wave, Lynne Reinner, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• EmbongA. R. (2001), Southeast Asian Middle Classes: Prospects for Social Change and Democratisation, UKM Publishing, Kuala Lumpur.
   Google Scholar
• GillG. (2000), The Dynamics of Democratization: Elites, Civil Society and the Transition Process, St Martin's Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• GuehennoJ. M. (1995), The End of the Nation State (trans ElliottVictoria), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• GuntherR. DiamandourosP. N. PuhleH. J., eds (1995), The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• HaggardS. KaufmanR. (1995), The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• HilleyJ. (2001), Malaysia: Mahathirism, Hegemony, and the New Opposition, Zed Books, London.
   Google Scholar
• HuntingtonS. P. (1993), The Third Wave: Democratisation in the Late Twentieth Century, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
   Google Scholar
• HuntingtonS. (1996), ‘Democracy for the long haul’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 7, April, p 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JesudasonJ. (1995), ‘Statist democracy and the limits to civil society in Malaysia’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, Vol 33, No 3, pp 335–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JesudasonJ. (1996), ‘The syncretic state and the structuring of oppositional politics in Malaysia’, in RodanG., ed, Political Oppositions in Industrialising Asia, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• JonesD. M. BrownD. (1994), ‘Singapore and the myth of the liberalizing middle class’, Pacific Review, Vol 7, No 1, pp 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• KahnJ. S. LohF., eds (1992), Fragmented Vision: Culture and Politics in Contemporary Malaysia, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• KooB. T. (1995), Paradoxes of Mahathirism: An Intellectual Biography of Mahathir Mohamad, Oxford University Press, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• LeftwichA., ed (1996), Democracy and Development: Theory and Practice, Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• LinzJ. StepanA. (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• LipsetS. (1959), ‘Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, No 53.
   Google Scholar
• LipsetS. (1960), Political Man, Anchor Books, Garden City, NY.
   Google Scholar
• WahF. Loh Kok (2002), ‘Developmentalism and the limits of democratic discourse’, in WahF. Loh Kok TiekKhoo Boo, eds, Democracy in Malaysia: Discourses and Practices, Curzon, Richmond.
   Google Scholar
• WahF. Loh Kok TiekKhoo Boo, eds (2002), Democracy in Malaysia: Discourses and Practices, Curzon, Richmond.
   Google Scholar
• LopezL. (1999), ‘Cleaning up the mess’, Asian Wall Street Journal, 15 January.
   Google Scholar
• LuckhamR. WhiteG., eds (1996), Democratisation in the South: The Jagged Wave, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• MeansG. (1996), ‘Soft authoritarianism in Malaysia and Singapore’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 7, No 4, pp 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NeherC. D. MarlayR. (1995), Values, Culture, Development and Democracy in Southeast Asia: The Winds of Change, Westview, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• O'DonnellG. SchmitterP. WhiteheadL., eds (1986), Transitions From Authoritarian Rule. Vol. 4: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• OttawayM. (2003), Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• PalanR. AbbottJ. (2000), State Strategies in the Global Political Economy, Cassell, London.
   Google Scholar
• PastorR. A., ed (1989), Democracy in the Americas: Stopping the Pendulum, Holmes and Meier, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Global Attitudes Project (2009), The Global Middle Class: Views on Democracy, Religion, Values, and Life Satisfaction in Emerging Nations, Pew Research, Washington, DC, Website: http://pewglobal.org/commentary/pdf/1051.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PyeL. (1985), Asian Power and Politics, Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• PuttnamR. (1995), ‘Bowling alone: America's declining social capital’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 6, No 1, pp 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• PuttnamR. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• RobisonR. GoodmanD., eds (1996), The New Rich in Asia: Mobile Phones, McDonalds and Middle-Class Revolutions, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• RostowW. (1960), The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• RueschemeyerD. StephensJ. (1992), Capitalist Development and Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• SaravanamuttuJ. (2006), ‘Democracy and modernity – when the twain shall meet? Reflections on the Asian conundrum’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, Vol 7, No 1, pp 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• SchedlerA. (2002a), ‘Elections without democracy: The menu of manipulation’, Journal of Democracy, Vol 13, No 2, pp 36–50.
   Google Scholar
• SchedlerA. (2002b), ‘The nested game of democratization by elections’, International Political Science Review, Vol 23, No 1, pp 103–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchedlerA., ed (2006), Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, Lynne Reinner, Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• StepanA. (1988), Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• TanS. (1990), ‘The rise of state authoritarianism in Malaysia’, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, Vol 22, No 3, pp 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• WeissM. (2006), Protest and Possibilities: Civil Society and Coalitions for Political Change in Malaysia, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• WelshB. (1996), ‘Attitudes towards democracy in Malaysia’, Asian Survey, Vol 36, No 9, pp 882–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WorthO. (2002), ‘The Janus-like character of counter-hegemony: Progressive and nationalist responses to globalisation’, Global Society, Vol 16, No 3, pp 297–315.
   Google Scholar