Democratization and the Politics of Environmental Claim-Making

References

• AntoJ. (2001), Limbah Pers di Danau Toba [The ‘Waste’ Press in Lake Toba], Yayasan Kippas, Medan, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• BarrC. ResosudarmoI. A. P. DermawanA. McCarthyJ. F. MoelionoM. SetionoB. (2006), Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia: Implications for Forest Sustainability, Economic Development and Community Livelihoods, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• BarryJ. WissenburgM., eds (2001), Sustaining Liberal Democracy: Ecological Challenges and Opportunities, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• BensonJ. K. (1982), ‘A framework for policy analysis’, in RogersD. L. WhittenD.A. , eds, Interorganizational Coordination, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, pp 137–176.
   Google Scholar
• CarrereR. LohmannL. (1996), Pulping the South, Zed Books, London.
   Google Scholar
• ChristoffP. (1996), ‘Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities’, Environmental Politics, Vol 5, No 3, pp 476–500.
   Google Scholar
• ColferC. J. P. ResosudarmoI. A. P., eds (2002), Which Way Forward? People, Forests, and Policymaking in Indonesia, Resources for Future, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• DaugbjergC. (1998), Policy Networks Under Pressure: Pollution Control, Policy Reform and the Power of Farmers, Ashgate, Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• DauvergneP. (1993/4), ‘The politics of deforestation in Indonesia’, Pacific Affairs, Vol 66, No 4, pp 497–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Down to Earth (1999), ‘Violence escalates at Indorayon pulp plant’, Down to Earth, No 41, May.
   Google Scholar
• Down to Earth (2000a), ‘Environment Minister recommends Indorayon closure’, Down to Earth, No 44, February.
   Google Scholar
• Down to Earth (2000b), ‘Indorayon closure undecided’, Down to Earth, No 45, May.
   Google Scholar
• Down to Earth (2003), ‘Thousands protest reopening of Indorayon pulp plant’, Down to Earth, No 56, February.
   Google Scholar
• DryzekJ. (1997), The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• EckersleyR. (1996), ‘Greening liberal democracy: The rights discourse revisited’, in DohertyB. de GeusM., eds, Democracy and Green Political Thought: Sustainability, Rights and Citizenship, Routledge, London, pp 212–236.
   Google Scholar
• ESCAP – United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific and ADB – Asian Development Bank (2000), State of the Environment in Asia and the Pacific 2000, United Nations, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Far Eastern Economic Review (1989), 6 April, p 86.
   Google Scholar
• GellertP. K. (2005), ‘Oligarchy in the timber markets of Indonesia: From APKINDO to IBRA to the future of the forests’, in ResosudarmoB. P., ed, The Politics and Economics of Indonesia's Natural Resources, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, pp 145–161.
   Google Scholar
• GibbsD. (2000), ‘Ecological modernisation, regional economic development and Regional Development Agencies’, Geoforum, No 31, pp 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• GrantW. (2002), ‘Political science perspectives on air pollution policy’, paper prepared for the workshop, Smoke and Mirrors: Air Pollution as a Social and Political Artifact, 11–12 January, Center for Global, International and Regional Studies, UC Santa Cruz, CA.
   Google Scholar
• GTZ–SMCP (2004), ‘Fact Sheet No 7: Pulp and paper industries’, July, GTZ–SMCP, Jakarta.
   Google Scholar
• HajerM. A. (1995), The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• KaneM. (1993), ‘Promoting political rights to protect the environment’, Yale Journal of International Law, Vol 18, pp 389–411.
   Google Scholar
• KingdonJ. (1995), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2 ed, Addison Wesley Longman, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Labat-Anderson Inc (1996), ‘Final audit findings: Environmental, safety, and health audit of pulp mill, rayon plant, and forestry operations’, unpublished report submitted to PT Inti Indorayon Utama, Porsea, North Sumatra.
   Google Scholar
• LanghelleO. (2000), ‘Why ecological modernisation and sustainable development should not be conflated’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, No 2, pp 303–322.
   Google Scholar
• ManurungF. (2001), The Impact of a Pulp-and-Rayon Factory on the Environment of Lake Toba and the People of the Region, Lake Toba Heritage Foundation (YPPDT), Jakarta.
   Google Scholar
• ManurungF. (2003), Recent Events on The Continuing Confrontation Between PT Inti Indorayon Utama and the Surrounding Population, Lake Toba Heritage Foundation (YPPDT), Jakarta.
   Google Scholar
• ManurungF. SinamoJ., eds (2000), The Impacts of PT Inti Indorayon Utama's Operations on the Environment of Lake Toba, Lake Toba Heritage Foundation (YPPDT), Jakarta.
   Google Scholar
• MarshD., ed (1998), Comparing Policy Networks, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• NomuraK. (2007), ‘Democratisation and environmental non-governmental organisations in Indonesia’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol 37, No 4, pp 495–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PotterD., ed (1996), ‘Democratisation and the environment: NGOs and deforestation policies in India (Karnataka) and Indonesia (North Sumatra)’, in NGOs and Environmental Policies: Asia and Africa, Frank Cass, London, pp 9–37.
   Google Scholar
• PurnomoA. (1994), ‘Policy influence for sustainable development: Case studies from the environmental movement in Indonesia’, unpublished Master's thesis (Urban and Environmental Policy), Tufts University, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• RobisonR. (1986), Indonesia: The Rise of Capital, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• RobisonR. (1993), ‘Indonesia: Tensions in state and regime’, in HewisonK. RobisonR. RodanG., eds, Southeast Asia in the 1990s: Authoritarianism, Democracy and Capitalism, Allen and Unwin, Sydney, pp 41–74.
   Google Scholar
• RobisonR. HadizV. R. (2004), Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets, Routledge Curzon, New York.
   Google Scholar
• SeippelØ. (2000), ‘Ecological modernisation as a theoretical device: Strengths and weaknesses’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, Vol 2, No 4, pp 287–302.
   Google Scholar
• SmithM. J. (1993), Pressure, Power and Policy: State Autonomy and Policy Networks in Britain and the United States, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
   Google Scholar
• SonnenfeldD. A. (1998), ‘Social movements, environment, and technology in Indonesia's pulp and paper industry’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Vol 39, No 1, pp 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• SonnenfeldD. A. (2000), ‘Contradictions of ecological modernisation: Pulp and paper manufacturing in South-East Asia’, Environmental Politics, Vol 9, No 1, pp 235–256.
   Google Scholar
• von MonroyJ. A. MaronneR. A. (1954), Report to the Government of Indonesia on a Preliminary Pulp and Paper Survey, Report No 294, FAO/54/7/4014, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• WranghamR. (2002), ‘Changing policy discourses and traditional communities, 1960–1999’, in ColferC. J. P. ResosudarmoI. A. P., eds, Which Way Forward? People, Forests, and Policymaking in Indonesia, Resources for Future, Washington, DC, pp 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• YoungS. C., ed (2000), The Emergence of Ecological Modernisation: Integrating the Environment and the Economy? Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• ZahariadisN. (1999), ‘Ambiguity, time, and multiple streams’, in SabatierP. A., ed, Theories of the Policy Process, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• ZahariadisN. AllenC. S. (1995), ‘Ideas, networks, and policy streams: Privatization in Britain and Germany’, Policy Studies Review, Vol 14, No 1/2, pp 71–98.
   Google Scholar
• ZulkarnaenM. S. (1996), ‘WALHI's experience in environmental preservation advocacy’, in Ibrahim R., ed, The Indonesian NGO Agenda: Toward the Year 2000, CESDA-LP3ES, Jakarta.
   Google Scholar