1,341
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
COMMENTARIES ON CLIMATE LITERACY

Raising Climate Literacy Through Addressing Misinformation: Case Studies in Agnotology-Based Learning

, &
Pages 296-306 | Received 15 Jun 2013, Accepted 16 Feb 2014, Published online: 09 Jul 2018

REFERENCES

  • AAP . Study consensus for global warming. The Australian , 16 May 2013. Available at http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/breaking-news/study-consensus-for-global-warming/story-fn3dxix6-1226644310095 (accessed 3 June 2013).
  • Ackerman, F. 2008. Hot, it's not: Reflections on Cool It!, by Bjorn Lomborg. Climatic Change 89 (3), 435–446.
  • Allegre, C., Armstrong, J.S., Breslow, J., Cohen, R., David, E., Happer, W., Kelly, M., Kininmonth, W., Lindzen, R., McGrath, J., Nichols, R., Rutan, B., Schmitt, H., Shaviv, N., Tennekes, H., and Zichichi, A. 2012. No need to panic about global warming. Wall Street Journal , 27 January 2012. Available at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366.html (accessed 5 June 2013).
  • Anderegg, W.R., Prall, J.W., Harold, J., and Schneider, S.H. 2010. Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 107 (27):12107–12109.
  • Bedford, D. 2010. Agnotology as a teaching tool: Learning climate science by studying misinformation. Journal of Geography , 109 (4):159–165.
  • Berland, L.K., and Reiser, B.J. 2008. Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education , 93 (1):26–55.
  • Braman, D., Kahan, D.M., Slovic, P., Gastil, J., and Cohen, G.L. 2007. The second national risk and culture study: Making sense of—and making progress in—The American culture war of fact. GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works. Paper 211.
  • Chater, N., and Vitanyi, P. 2003. Simplicity: A unifying principle in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science , 7 :19–22.
  • Cook, J. 2014. Three perfect grade debunkings of climate misinformation. Skeptical Science. Available at http://skepticalscience.com/Three-perfect-grade-debunkings-climate-misinformation.html (accessed 20 January 2014).
  • Cook, J., and Lewandowsky, S. 2011. The Debunking Handbook. St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland. Available at http://sks.to/debunk
  • Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S.A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., and Skuce, A. 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters , 8 (2): 024024+.
  • Cresser, M.S., Batty, L.C., Boxall, A., and Adams, C. 2012. Introduction to environmental science: Earth and man. London: Pearson.
  • Crichton, M. 2004. State of Fear. New York: Avon Books, HarperCollins.
  • Diethelm, P., and McKee, M. 2009. Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? The European Journal of Public Health , 19 (1):2–4.
  • Ding, D., Maibach, E.W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., and Leiserowitz, A. 2011. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change , 1 (9):462–466.
  • Doran, P.T., and Zimmerman, M.K. 2009. Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union , 90 (3):22–22.
  • Dunlap, R., and McCright, A. 2008. A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 50 (5):26–35.
  • Ecker, U.K.H., Lewandowsky, S., and Tang, D.T.W. 2010. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition , 38:1087–1100.
  • Elsasser, S.W., and Dunlap, R.E. 2012. Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists' dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science. American Behavioral Scientist , 57 (6):754–776.
  • Guzzetti, B.J., Williams, W.O., Skeels, S.A., and Wu, S.M. 1997. Influence of text structure on learning counterintuitive physics concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 34 (7):701–719.
  • Hamilton, L.C. 2011. Education, politics, and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change , 104 (2):231–242.
  • Hamilton, L.C. 2012. Did the Arctic ice recover? Demographics of true and false climate facts. Weather, Climate, and Society , 4 (4):236–249.
  • Hannam, P. Obama gives Aussie researcher 31,541,507 reasons to celebrate. Sydney Morning Herald , 17 May 2013. Available at http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/obama-gives-aussie-researcher-31541507-reasons-to-celebrate-20130517-2jqrh.html (accessed 3 June 2013).
  • Heath, D., and Heath, C. 2007. Made to stick: Why some ideas survive and others die. New York, NY: Random House.
  • Heath, Y., and Gifford, R. 2006. Free-market ideology and environmental degradation the case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior , 38 (1):48–71.
  • Hoggan, J., and Littlemore, R. 2009. Climate cover-up. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Greystone Books.
  • Holland, G.J., and Webster, P.J. In press. Heightened tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic: Natural variability or climate trend? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences . Available at http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/people/holland/files/hw2007final.pdf (accessed 1 May 2014).
  • Johnson, H.M., and Seifert, C.M. 1994. Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition , 20:1420–1436.
  • Kahan, D., Jenkins-Smith, H., Tarantola, T., Silva, C., and Braman, D. 2012. Geoengineering and the science communication environment: A cross-cultural experiment. The Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper, No. 92.
  • Kahan, D.M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L.L., Braman, D., and Mandel, G. 2012. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change , 2 (10):732–735.
  • Kendeou, P., and van den Broek, P. 2007. The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition , 35 (7):1567–1577.
  • Kennedy, R.F., Jr. 2006. Was the 2004 election stolen? Rolling Stone , 15 June 2006.
  • Kowalski, P., and Taylor, A.K. 2009. The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology , 36:153–159.
  • Kuhn, D., and Crowell, A. 2011. Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents' thinking. Psychological Science , 22 (4):545–552.
  • Leiserowitz, A. 2006. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change , 77 (1–2):45–72.
  • Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., and Howe, P. 2012. Climate change in the American mind: Americans' global warming beliefs and attitudes in September, 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Available at http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Climate-Beliefs-September-2012.pdf (accessed 14 May 2013).
  • Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G.E., and Vaughan, S. 2012. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change , 3:399–404.
  • Loewenstein, G. 1994. The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin , 116:75–98.
  • Lomborg, B. 2007. Cool it! The skeptical environmentalists' guide to global warming. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Lombrozo, T. 2007. Simplicity and probability in causal explanation. Cognitive Psychology , 55:232–257.
  • Mandia, S.A. 2012. A model for teaching a climate change elective science course at the community college level. Paper presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA. December 3–7, 2012.
  • Mandia, S.A. 2013. Rubric for research paper evaluation. Available at http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/met295/rubric_paper.pdf (accessed 6 June 2013).
  • Manjoo, F. 2008. True enough: Learning to live in a post-fact society. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Manson, L., Gava, M., and Boldrin, A. 2008. On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology , 100:291–309.
  • McCaffrey, M., Berbeco, M., and Scott, E. 2013. Toward a climate and energy literate society: Recommendations from the Climate & Energy Literacy Summit, December 7–9, 2012, Berkeley, California. National Center for Science Education. Available at http://ncse.com/files/pub/evolution/NCSE%20Climate%20and%20Energy%20Literacy%20Summit%20Report.pdf (accessed 2 October 2013).
  • McCright, A.M., and Dunlap, R.E. 2000. Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems , 47:499–522.
  • McCright, A.M., and Dunlap, R.E. 2011. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change , 21 (4):1163–1172.
  • McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E., and Xiao, C. 2013. Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change , 119 (2):511–518.
  • McCrudden, M.T., and Kendeou, P. 2014. Exploring the link between cognitive processes and learning from refutational text. Journal of Research in Reading , 37 (S1):S116–S140.
  • Muller, D.A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M.D., and Reimann, P. 2008. Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 24 (2):144–155.
  • National Center for Education Statistics . (n.d.) Quickstats. Available at http://nces.ed.gov/datalab/quickstats/default.aspx (accessed 12 June 2013).
  • Nisbet, M.C., and Myers, T. 2007. The polls—Trends twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly , 71 (3):444–470.
  • Nordhaus, W.D. 2012. Why the global warming skeptics are wrong. The New York Review of Books , 59 (5):32–34.
  • Nuccitelli, D. 2013. 97% global warming consensus meets resistance from scientific denialism. The Guardian . Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/28/global-warming-consensus-climate-denialism-characteristics (accessed 3 June 2013).
  • Obama, B. (13 May 2013) Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous. Read more: http://OFA.BO/gJsdFp [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/335089477296988160
  • Oreskes, N. 2004. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science , 3606 (5702):1686–1686.
  • Oreskes, N. 2007. The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know we're not wrong? Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Oreskes, N. 2010. My facts are better than your facts: Spreading good news about global warming. In Morgan, M.S., and Howlett, P., eds., How do facts travel? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 135–166.
  • Oreskes, N., and Conway, E.M. 2010. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  • Osborne, J. 2010. Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science , 328 (5977):463–466.
  • Pearlman, J. 2013. Scientific “consensus” that humans to blame for climate change. The Telegraph, 16 May 2013. Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/10061285/Scientific-consensus-that-humans-to-blame-for-climate-change.html (accessed 3 June 2013).
  • Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (Pew) . 2012. More say there is solid evidence of global warming. Available at http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/10-15-12%20Global%20Warming%20Release.pdf (accessed 14 May 2013).
  • Pipkin, B.W., Trent, D.D., Hazlett, R., and Bierman, P. 2014. Geology and the environment. Stamford, CT: Cengage.
  • Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., and Gertzog, W.A. 1982. Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education , 66:211–227.
  • Prince, M. 2004. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education , 93 (3):223–231.
  • Proctor, R.N. 2008. Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In Proctor, R.N., and Schiebinger, L., eds., Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, p. 1–33.
  • Schwarz, N., Sanna, L.J., Skurnik, I., and Yoon, C. 2007. Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 39:127–161.
  • Seifert, C.M. 2002. The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective? The Psychology of Learning and Motivation , 41:265–292.
  • SkepticalScience.com . n.d. Global warming and climate change myths. Available at http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php (accessed 12 June 2013).
  • Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D.C., and Schwarz, N. 2005. How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research , 31:713–724.
  • Suffolk County Community College . 2010. Title III Application: Strengthening Institutions Program, Title III, Part A of The Higher Education Act of 1965, CFDA # 84.031a, PR/Award # P031A100077.
  • Tippett, C.D. 2010. Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education , 8 (6):951–970.
  • van den Broek, P., and Kendeou, P. 2008. Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 22:335–351.
  • Weber, E.U., and Stern, P.C. 2011. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist , 66 (4):315–328.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.