The Roles of Working Memory and Cognitive Load in Geoscience Learning

REFERENCES

• Adams, J.W., and Hitch, G.J. 1997. Working memory and children's mental addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 67:21–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S., and Loizou, A.T. 2003. The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science 27:669–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., and Tytler, R. 2011. Drawing to learn in science. Science 333:1096–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P., and Alloway, R.G. 2010. Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 106:20–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P., Gathercole, S.E., Adams, A.M., Willis, C., Eaglen, R., and Lamont, E. 2005. Working memory and phonological awareness as predictors of progress towards early learning goals at school entry. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23:417–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P., Gathercole, S.E., Kirkwood, H., and Elliott, J. 2009. The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development 80:606–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P., and Passolunghi, M.C. 2011. The relationship between working memory, IQ: and mathematical skills in children. Learning and Individual Differences 21:133–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, U. 2007. The contribution of working memory to children's mathematical word problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21:1201–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelo, T.A., and Cross, K.P. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Antonenko, P.D., and Niederhauser, D.S. 2010. The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior 26:140–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. 2005. Multimedia learning of mathematics. In Mayer, R., ed., The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 393–408.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, P. 2006. Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction 16:389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 4:417–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A.D., and Hitch, G. 1974. Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 8:47–89.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A.D., Thomson, N., and Buchanan, M. 1975. Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14:575–589.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, S., and Sanchez, C.A. 2012. Working memory capacity and learning underlying conceptual relationships across multiple documents. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26:594–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, S.L., Kraft, R.G., Glover, J.A., and Plake, B.S. 1984. Cognitive capacity differences among writers. Journal of Educational Psychology 76:820–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., and Scerif, G. 2001. Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology 19:273–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, M.M., Coyan, J.A., and Reynolds, S.J. 2010 a. Exploring how text–figure configuration affects introductory geology student learning behavior using eye-tracking technology. In Holscher, C., Shipley, T.F., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Bateman, J., and Newcombe, N.S., eds., Proceedings of Spatial Cognition 2010. Mt. Hood, OR. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, M.M., Coyan, J.A., and Reynolds, S.J. 2010 b. Using eye tracking to explore how the spatial arrangement of text and figures influences geology learning. In Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, National Meeting, Paper 76-1.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.I., and Xue, Q. 2001. Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130:299–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, J., Engle, R.W., and Hamilton, G. 1991. Short-term memory, working memory, and verbal abilities: How do they relate? Intelligence 15:229–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, R., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 2003. Learning and understanding science instructional material. Journal of Educational Psychology 95:629–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P.A., and Just, M.A. 1986. Spatial ability: An information processing approach to psychometrics. Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence 3:221–253.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8:293–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W.C., and Whitehead, R. 2009. Understanding physics in relation to working memory. Research in Science and Technological Education 27:151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R.C., and Mayer, R.E. 2003. E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, A.R.A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M.F., Therriault, D., and Minkoff, S. 2002. A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence 30:163–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A.R.A., and Engle, R.W. 1996. Individual differences in working memory capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory 4:577–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A., and Jarrold, C. 2008. Variation in working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coyan, J.A., Busch, M.M., and Reynolds, S.J. 2010 a. Teaching students to disembed geologic features through signaling: an eye-tracking study. Poster presented at the Geological Society of America National Meeting, Denver, CO, October 10–November 3, 2010, Paper 248-14.
   Google Scholar
• Coyan, J.A., Busch, M.M., and Reynolds, S.J. 2010 b. Using eye tracking to evaluate the effectiveness of signaling to promote dissembedding of geologic features in photographs. In Holscher, C., Shipley, T.F., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Bateman, J., and Newcombe, N.S., eds., Proceedings of Spatial Cognition 2010. Mt. Hood, OR. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., and Carpenter, P.A. 1980. Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19:450–466.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., and Merikle, P.M. 1996. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 3:422–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danili, E., and Reid, N. 2004. Some strategies to improve performance in school chemistry, based on two cognitive factors. Research in Science and Technological Education 222:203–226.
   Google Scholar
• De Smedt, B., Verschaffel, L., and Ghesquière, P. 2009. The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1034:469–479.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, P., LeFevre, J.A., and Twilley, L.C. 1988. Word knowledge and working memory as predictors of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 80:465–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R.W. 2002. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 111:19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R.W., Carullo, J.J., and Collins, K.W. 1991. Individual differences in working memory for comprehension and following directions. Journal of Educational Research 845:253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R.W., Tuholski, S.W., Laughlin, J.E., and Conway, A.R. 1999. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1283:309–331.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S.R., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M. 2014. Active learning improves student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23):8410–8415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnier, K.M., Atit, K., Ormand, C.J., and Shipley, T.F. 2016. Comprehending 3D diagrams: Sketching to support spatial reasoning. Topics in Cognitive Science , 8 (4):1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12233 .
   Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S.E., Pickering, S.J., Knight, C., and Stegmann, Z. 2004. Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology 181:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Geary, D.C., Hoard, M.K., Nugent, L., and Bailey, D.H. 2012. Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology 1041:206–223.
   Google Scholar
• Ginns, P. 2006. Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction 166:511–525.
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D.Z., Libarkin, J.C., Petcovic, H.L., Baker, K.M., Elkins, J., Callahan, C.N., Turner, S.P., Rench, T.A., and LaDue, N.D. 2012. A test of the circumvention-of-limits hypothesis in scientific problem solving: The case of geological bedrock mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141:397–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harp, S.F., and Mayer, R.E. 1997. The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology 891:92–102.
   Google Scholar
• Harp, S.F., and Mayer, R.E. 1998. How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 903:414–434.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Shah, P., and Miyake, A. 2000. Constraints on using the dual-task methodology to specify the degree of central executive involvement in cognitive tasks. Memory and Cognition 283:376–385.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., Adams, J.W., and Hamilton, C.J. 2008. The relationship between visuospatial sketchpad capacity and children's mathematical skills. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology . 202:272–289.
   Google Scholar
• Jarosz, A.F., and Wiley, J. 2012. Why does working memory capacity predict RAPM performance? A possible role of distraction. Intelligence 405:427–438.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.K., and Reynolds, S.J. 2005. Concept sketches: Using student- and instructor-generated, annotated sketches for learning, teaching, and assessment in geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education 531:85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J.K., Reynolds, S.J., Tyburczy, J., Busch, M.M., and Coyan, J.A. 2009. Resolving the breadth versus depth versus inquiry dilemma in introductory college geology courses. In Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, National Meeting, Paper 49-1.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A.H., Hogg, W.R., and Ziane, M. 1993. A working memory model applied to physics problem solving. International Journal of Science Education 15:663–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kail, R., and Hall, L.K. 2001. Distinguishing short-term memory from working memory. Memory and Cognition 291:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., and Orion, N. 1996. Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 334:369–391.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., and Sweller, J. 1998. Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 401:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kastens, K.A., and Ishikawa, T. 2006. Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In Manduca, C.A., and Mogk, D., eds., Earth and mind: How geologists think and learn about the earth. Geological Society of America Special Paper 413. Philadelphia, PA: Geological Society of America, p. 51–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, D., and Holyoak, K.J. 2000. Transfer and expertise. In Tulving, E., and Craik, F.I.M., eds., The Oxford handbook of memory. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, R., and Russell, J. 2005. Multimedia learning of chemistry. In Mayer, R.E., ed., Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 409–428.
   Google Scholar
• Kyllonen, P.C., and Christal, R.E. 1990. Reasoning ability is little more than working-memory capacity? Intelligence 144:389–433.
   Google Scholar
• Kyllonen, P.C., and Stephens, D.L. 1990. Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill. Learning and Individual Differences 22:129–160.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A.E. 1995. Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Ng: E.L., and Ng, S.F. 2009. The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology 1012:373–387.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Plass, J.L., and Homer, B.D. 2006. Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations. Journal of Educational Psychology 98:902–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeFevre, J., DeStefano, D., Coleman, B., and Shanahan, T. 2005. Mathematical cognition and working memory. In Campbell, J.I.D., ed., Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York: Psychology Press, p. 361–377.
   Google Scholar
• Liben, L.S., and Titus, S.J. 2012. The importance of spatial thinking for geoscience education: Insights from the crossroads of geoscience and cognitive science. In Kastens, K.A., and Manduca, C.A., eds., Earth and mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. Geological Society of America Special Paper 486. Charlotte, NC: Geological Society of America, p. 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Logie, R.H. 1995. Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Logie, R.H. 2003. Spatial and visual working memory: A mental workspace. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 42:37–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, D.F. 1988. Spatial abilities as traits, processes and knowledge. In Sternberg R.J., ed., Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 181–248.
   Google Scholar
• Lohman, D.F. 1996. Spatial ability and g. In Dennis, I., and Tapsfield, P., eds., Human abilities: Their nature and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 97–116.
   Google Scholar
• Low, R., and Sweller, J. 2005. The modality principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R.E., ed., Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, p. 147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, R.K. 2005. Multimedia learning of meteorology. In Mayer, R.E., ed., The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 429–446.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, R., and Korinek, L. 1995. Cooperative learning activities in large entry-level geology courses. Journal of Geological Education 43:341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Marshalek, B., Lohman, D.F., and Snow, R.E. 1983. The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence 72:107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Mautone, P.D., and Mayer, R.E. 2001. Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 932:377–389.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E. 2005. Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity principles. In Mayer, R.E., ed., Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 183–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E., and Anderson, R.B. 1991. Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 834:484–490.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E., and Anderson, R.B. 1992. The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 844:444–452.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E., Heiser, J., and Lonn, S. 2001. Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology 931:187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E., and Jackson, J. 2005. The case for coherence in scientific explanations: Quantitative details can hurt qualitative understanding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 111:13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R.E., Mautone, P., and Prothero, W. 2002. Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology 941:171–185.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie W.J., and Svinicki, M. 2006. Problem-based learning: Teaching with cases, simulations, and games. In McKeachie, W.J., ed., McKeachie's teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers, 12th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, p. 222–225.
   Google Scholar
• Mishkin, M., and Ungerleider, L.G. 1982. Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys. Behavioral Brain Research 61:57–77.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, R., McNeal, K.S., and Bondell, H.D. 2016. Pupillary response to complex interdependent tasks: A cognitive-load theory perspective. Behavior Research Methods 48:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Rettinger, D.A., Shah, P., and Hegarty, M. 2001. How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1304:621–640.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., and Shah, P. 1999. Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. 2004. Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science 321:99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., and Mayer, R.E. 2000. A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology 921:117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S.Y., Low, R., and Sweller, J. 1995. Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology 872:319–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F.G., and van Merriënboer, J.J. 1994. Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology 86:122–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F.G., van Merriënboer, J.J., and Adam, J.J. 1994. Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79:419–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passolunghi, M.C., Vercelloni, B., and Schadee, H. 2007. The precursors of mathematics learning: Working memory, phonological ability and numerical competence. Cognitive Development 222:165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, S.J., and Gathercole, S.E. 2004. Distinctive working memory profiles in children with special educational needs. Educational Psychology 243:393–408.
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K., Maier, U.H., and Staley, R. 2002. From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning. Journal of Experimental Education 704:293–315.
   Google Scholar
• Reusser, L.J., Corbett, L.B., and Bierman, P.R. 2012. Incorporating concept sketching into teaching undergraduate geomorphology. Journal of Geoscience Education 601:3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S.J. 2012. Some important aspects of spatial cognition in field geology. In Kastens, K.A., and Manduca, C.A., eds., Earth and mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. Geological Society of America Special Paper 486. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, p. 75–77.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S.J., Johnson, J.K., Morin, P.J., and Carter, C.M. 2015. Exploring geology, 4th ed. Dubuque, IA, McGraw-Hill Education, 672 p.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S.J., Johnson, J.K., Piburn, M.D., Leedy, D.E., Coyan, J.A., and Busch, M.M. 2005. Visualization in undergraduate geology courses. In Gilbert, J.K., ed., Visualization in science education. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 253–266.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S.J., and Peacock, S.M. 1998. Slide observations—Promoting active observation, landscape appreciation, and critical thinking in introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education 46:421–426.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, S.J., Piburn, M.D., Leedy, D.E., McAuliffe, C.M., Birk, J.P., and Johnson, J.K. 2006. The Hidden Earth-Interactive computer-based modules for geoscience learning. In Manduca, C., and Mogk, D., eds., Earth and mind: How geologists think and learn about the earth. Geological Society of America Special Paper 413. Philadelphia, PA: Geological Society of America, p. 171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, S.M., Booth, J.N., Campbell, L.E., Blythe, R.A., Wheate, N.J., and Delibegovic, M. 2014. Evidence for a role of executive functions in learning biology. Infant and Child Development 231:67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C.A., and Wiley, J. 2006. An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory and Cognition 342:344–355.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C.A., and Wiley, J. 2014. The role of dynamic spatial ability in geoscience text comprehension. Learning and Instruction 31:33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, P., and Miyake, A. 1996. The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1251:4–27.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, R. 1989. Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. In Ackerman, P., Sternberg, R., and Glaser, R., eds., Learning and individual differences. New York: Freeman, p. 13–59.
   Google Scholar
• Stull, A.T., and Mayer, R.E. 2007. Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology 994:808–820.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H.L., and Jerman, O. 2006. Math disabilities: A preliminary meta-analysis of the published literature on cognitive processes. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities. 19:285–314.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1988. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 122:257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1994. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 44:295–312.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., and Kalyuga, S. 2011. Measuring cognitive load. In Sweller, J., Ayers, P., and Kalyuga, S., eds., Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer New York, p. 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K.S. 2013. Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 14:156–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarmizi, R.A., and Sweller, J. 1988. Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 804:424–436.
   Google Scholar
• Tikoff, B. 2014. Sketching in the Geosciences. Talk presented at a special workshop on Sketching in Science Education. May, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Tillman, C., Eninger, L., Forssman, L., and Bohlin, G. 2011. The relation between working memory components and ADHD symptoms from a developmental perspective. Developmental Neuropsychology 362:181–198.
   Google Scholar
• Toll, S.W., and Van Luit, J.E. 2013. Accelerating the early numeracy development of kindergartners with limited working memory skills through remedial education. Research in Developmental Disabilities 34:745–755.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., and Engle, R.W. 2007. The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review 1141:104–132.
   Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J. 2010. Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review 223:271–296.
   Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., and Jarodzka, H. 2013. Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance cognitive and metacognitive processes in computer-based learning environments. In Azevedo, R., and Aleven, V., eds., International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies. New York: Springer New York, p. 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Vicari, S., Bellucci, S., and Carlesimo, G.A. 2006. Evidence from two genetic syndromes for the independence of spatial and visual working memory. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 4802:126–131.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., Ash, I.K., Sanchez, C.A., and Jaeger, A. 2011. Clarifying goals of reading for understanding from expository science text. In McCrudden, M.T., Magliano, J.P., and Schraw, G., eds., Text relevance and learning from text. Charlotte, NC: Information Age, p. 353–374.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., Sanchez, C.A., and Jaeger, A.J. 2014. The individual differences in working memory capacity principle in multimedia learning. In Mayer, R.E., ed., The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 598–619.
   Google Scholar
• Zbrodoff, N.J., and Logan, G.D. 2005. What everyone finds: The problem-size effect. In Campbell, J.I.D., ed., Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York: Psychology Press, p. 331–345.
   Google Scholar