Learning About Spatial and Temporal Scale: Current Research, Psychological Processes, and Classroom Implications

REFERENCES

• Atit, K., Garnier, K., and Shipley, T.F. 2015. Student gestures aid penetrative thinking. Journal of Geoscience Education 63:66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Atit, K., Shipley, T.F., and Tikoff, B. 2014. A framework for classifying spatial gestures. In Montello, D.R., Grossner, K., and Janelle, D.J., eds., Space in mind: Concepts for spatial learning and education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins K. 2013. Investigating the geologic time scale: Creating posters to display trends in geologic time. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/sp/mnstep/activities/19783.html (accessed 10 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Atmospheric Science Literacy Framework . 2007. Atmospheric science literacy: The essential principles and fundamental concepts of atmospheric science. Available at http://eo.ucar.edu/asl/ (accessed 10 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Barth, H.C., and Paladino, A.M. 2011. The development of numerical estimation: Evidence against a representational shift. Developmental Science 14:125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C.C., and Eison, J.A. 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Washington, DC: George Washington University School of Education and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, T.W., Levine, S.C., and Huttenlocher, J. 2008. Development of proportional reasoning: Where young children go wrong. Developmental Psychology 44:1478–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catley, K., and Novick, L. 2009. Digging deep: Exploring college students' knowledge of macroevolutionary time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46:311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A. 2008. The neural organization of spatial thought and language. Seminars in Speech and Language 29:226–238.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheek, K.A. 2012. Students' understanding of large numbers as a key factor in their understanding of geologic time. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10:1047–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek, K.A. 2013 a. Exploring the relationship between students' understanding of conventional time and geologic time. International Journal of Science Education 35:1925–1945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek, K.A. 2013 b. How geoscience novices reason about temporal duration: The role of spatial thinking and large numbers. Journal of Geoscience Education 61:334–348.
   Google Scholar
• Cheek, K.A. 2013 c. Washed away! Science and Children 50:52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cheek, K.A. 2016. Early view. Do Indonesian children's experiences with large currency units facilitate magnitude estimation of long temporal periods? Research in Science Education 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Clary, R.M., Brzuszek, R.F., and Wandersee, J.H. 2009. Students' geocognition of deep time, conceptualized in an informal educational setting. Journal of Geoscience Education 57:275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., and Gentner, D. 1987. How people construct mental models. In Holland, D., and Quinn, N., eds., Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 243–265.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D.C. 2013. Similarity in middle school mathematics: At the crossroad of geometry and number. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 15:3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. 1997. The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. 2003. The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:145–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., and Pica, P. 2008. Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science 320:1217–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, C. 2013 a. Cross-cultural study of understanding of scale and measurement: Does the everyday use of U.S. customary units disadvantage U.S. students? International Journal of Science Education 35:1277–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, C. 2013 b. Navigating deep time: Landmarks for time from the big bang to the present. Journal of Geoscience Education 61:103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, D., Callahan, T., Van Sickle, M., and Hay, G. 2005. Students' conceptions of scale regarding groundwater. Journal of Geoscience Education 53:374–380.
   Google Scholar
• Dodick, J., and Orion, N. 2003. Cognitive factors affecting student understanding of geologic time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40:415–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earth Science Literacy Initiative . 2010. Earth Science literacy principles: The big ideas and supporting concepts of Earth Science. Available at http://www.earthscienceliteracy.org/index.html (accessed 10 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., and Spelke, E. 2004. Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:307–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn A.E. 2007. Investigating ordering planets: Math connections and number sense in science. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/sp/mnstep/activities/planets.html (accessed 10 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Frändberg, B., Lincoln, P., and Wallin, A. 2013. Linguistic resources used in grade 8 students' submicro level explanations—Science items from TIMSS 2007. Research in Science Education 43:2387–2406.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, A., and Möhring, W. 2016. A matter of balance: Motor control is related to children's spatial and proportional reasoning skills. Frontiers in Psychology 6:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, B. 2005. Build your own stream table. Available at http://nagt.org/nagt/teaching_resources/teachingmaterials/9271.html (accessed 10 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. 1983. Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7:155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. 1989. The mechanisms of analogical learning. In Vosniadou, S., and Ortony, A., eds., Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 199–241.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. 2006. Why verbs are hard to learn. In Hirsh-Pasek, K., and Golinkoff, R., eds., Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, p. 544–564.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Anggoro, F.K., and Kilbanoff, R.S. 2011. Structure mapping and relational language support children's learning of relational categories. Child Development 82:1173–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Levine, S.C., Ping, R., Isaia, A., Dhillon, S., Bradley, C., and Honke, G. 2016. Rapid learning in a children's museum via analogical comparison. Cognitive Science 40:224–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., and Hung, B. 2007. Comparison facilitates children's learning of names for parts. Journal of Cognition and Development 8:285–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., and Markman, A.B. 1994. Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science 5:152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., and Markman, A.B. 1997. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52:45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., and Smith, L. 2012. Analogical reasoning. In Ramachandran. V.S., ed., Encyclopedia of human behavior, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, p. 130–136.
   Google Scholar
• Geoscience Employers Workshop Outcomes . 2015. EAR-1347209: The future of undergraduate geoscience education. Available at http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/events/files/Employers_Workshop_outcomes.pdf (accessed 16 January 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, K., Trate, J., Blecking, A., Geissinger, P., and Murphy, K. 2014 a. Investigation of absolute and relative scaling conceptions of students in introductory college chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education 91:1526–1537.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, K., Trate, J., Blecking, A., Geissinger, P., and Murphy, K. 2014 b. Valid and reliable assessments to measure scale literacy of students in introductory college chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education 91:1538–1545.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, K., and Riegler, P. 2015. Beginning students may be less capable of proportional reasoning than they appear to be. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications 34:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel G. Confrey J. 1994. The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, A., San Fernando, I.E.S., and Otero, I.C.E.J. 2004. An analysis of the understanding of geological time by students at secondary and post-secondary level. International Journal of Science Education 26:845–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J.H., Holyoak, K.J., Nisbett, R.E., and Thagard, P.R. 1986. Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L.V., and Duncan, S. 1991. Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review 98:352–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L.V., and Prohaska, V. 1988. Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: Estimating the date of events. Psychological Review 95:471–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C.L., Semple, I.L., and Creem-Regehr, S.H. 2013. The effects of scaling cues and interactivity on a viewer's ability to estimate the size of features shown on outcrop imagery. Journal of Geoscience Education 61:68–80.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., and Tymms, P. 2011. The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:849–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, A., Jones, F., and Harris, S. 2013. Measuring student knowledge of landscapes and their formation timespans. Journal of Geoscience Education 61:240–251.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., Gardner, G., Taylor, A.R., Wiebe, E., and Forrester, J. 2011. Conceptualizing magnification and scale: The roles of spatial visualization and logical thinking. Research in Science Education 41:357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., Paechter, M., Yen, C.-F., Gardner, G., Taylor, A., and Tretter, T. 2013. Teachers' concepts of spatial scale: An international comparison. International Journal of Science Education 35:2462–2482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., and Taylor, A. 2009. Developing a sense of scale: Looking backward. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46:460–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., Taylor, A., and Broadwell, B. 2009a. Concepts of scale held by students with visual impairment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46:506–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., Taylor, A., and Broadwell, B. . 2009b. Estimating linear size and scale: Body rulers. International Journal of Science Education , 31:1495–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., and Carter, G. 2007. Understanding scale: Powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology 16:191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., Thomas, A., Superfine, R., and Taylor, R. 2003. Learning at the nanoscale: The impact of students' use of remote microscopy on concepts of viruses, scale, and microscopy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40:303–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M.G., Tretter, T., Taylor, A., and Oppewal, T. 2008. Experienced and novice teachers' concepts of spatial scale. International Journal of Science Education 30:409–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlstrom, K., Semken, S., Crossey, L., Perry, D., Gyllenhaal, E.D., Dodick, J., Williams, M., Hellmich-Bryan, J., Crow, R. Watts, N.B., and Ault, C. 2008. Informal geoscience education on a grand scale: The trail of time exhibition at Grand Canyon. Journal of Geoscience Education 56:354–361.
   Google Scholar
• Kastens, K.A., and Rivet, A. 2008. Multiple modes of inquiry in Earth Science. Science Teacher 75:26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, R.A., and Roehrig, G.H. 2005. A comparison study: Assessing teachers' conceptions with the Chemistry Concepts Inventory. Journal of Chemical Education 82:1246–1250.
   Google Scholar
• Landy, D., Charlesworth, A., and Ottmar, E. 2016. Early view. Categories of large numbers in line estimation. Cognitive Science 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Landy, D., Silbert, N., and Goldin, A. 2013. Estimating large numbers. Cognitive Science 37:775–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-S., Liu, O.L., Price, C.A., and Kendall, A.L.M. 2011. College students' temporal-magnitude recognition ability associated with durations of scientific changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:317–335.
   Google Scholar
• Libarkin, J., Kurdziel, J., and Anderson, S. 2007. College student conceptions of geological time and the disconnect between ordering and scale. Journal of Geoscience Education 55:413–422.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., and Yeh, Y.-F. 2012. The role of computer simulation in an inquiry-based learning environment: Reconstructing geological events as geologists. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21:370–383.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Shipley, T.F., Brumberg, J., and Ennis, M. 2011. Similarities in object and event segmentation: A geometric approach to spatiotemporal segmentation. Spatial Cognition and Computation 11:254–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, A.B., and Gentner, D. 1993. Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology 25:431–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowski, P., and Richardson, Y. 2010. Mesoscale meteorology in midlatitudes. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P.G., Lewis, M.R., and Hubbard, E.M. 2016. Individual differences in nonsymbolic ratio processing predict symbolic math performance. Psychological Science 27:191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B.W., and Brewer, W.F. 2010. Misconceptions of astronomical distances. International Journal of Science Education 32:1549–1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhring, W., Newcombe, N.S., and Frick, A. 2014. Zooming in on spatial scaling: Preschool children and adults use mental transformations to scale spaces. Developmental Psychology 50:1614–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhring, W., Newcombe, N.S., and Frick, A. 2015. The relation between spatial thinking and proportional reasoning in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 132:213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhring, W., Newcombe, N.S., Levine, S.C., and Frick, A. 2016. Spatial proportional reasoning is associated with formal knowledge about fractions. Journal of Cognition and Development 17:67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhhamed A.R. 2016. What sizes are the planets and how do they move around the sun? Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/sp/mnstep/activities/35914.html (accessed 10 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Nam, Y., Karahan, E., and Roehrig, G. 2016. Native American students' understanding of geologic time scale: 4th–8th grade Ojibwe students' understanding of Earth's geologic history. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11:485–503.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council . 2012. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, N.S., and Shipley, T.F. 2014. Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In Geto, J.S., ed., Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity. New York: Springer, p. 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Lead States . 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., and Zhou, Y.-D. 2005. Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origin and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist 40:27–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoll, G. 2003. A qualitative investigation of undergraduate chemistry students' macroscopic interpretations of the submicroscopic structure of molecules. Journal of Chemical Education 80:205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Office of Education and National Marine Sanctuary . 2013. Ocean literacy: The essential principles and fundamental concepts of ocean science for learners of all ages. Available at http://oceanliteracy.wp2.coexploration.org/ocean-literacy-framework/ (access 10 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Ormand, C.J., Manduca, C., Shipley, T.F., Tikoff, B., and Harwood, C.L. 2014. Evaluating geoscience students' spatial thinking skills in a multi-institutional classroom study. Journal of Geoscience Education 62:146–154.
   Google Scholar
• Paola, C., Mullin, J., Ellis, C., Mohring, D.C., Swenson, J.B., Parker, G., Hickson, T., Heller, P.L., Pratson, L., Syvitski, J., Sheets, B., and Strong, N. 2001. Experimental stratigraphy. GSA Today 11:4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J.D. 2014. Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education 50:1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzer, L.L., and Roth, W.-M. 2003. Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40:1089–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, I., Davatzes, A., Newcombe, N.S., and Shipley, T.F. 2017. Using relational reasoning to learn about scientific phenomena at unfamiliar scales. Educational Psychology Review [Special Issue].
   Google Scholar
• Rundgren, C.-J., Rundgren, S.-N.C., and Schönborn, K.J. 2010. Students' conceptions of water transport. Journal of Biological Education 44:129–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneps, M.H., Ruel, J., Sonnert, G., Dussault, M., Griffin, M., and Sadler, P.M. 2014. Conceptualizing astronomical scale: Virtual simulations on handheld tablet computers reverse misconceptions. Computers and Education 70:269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, T.F., Tikoff, B., Ormand, C., and Manduca, C. 2013. Structural geology practice and learning, from the perspective of cognitive science. Journal of Structural Geology 54:72–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R., and Opfer, J. 2003. The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science 14:237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R., Thompson, C.A., and Opfer, J. 2009. The logarithmic-to-linear shift: One learning sequence, many tasks, many time scales. Mind, Brain, and Education 3:143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summit on Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education . 2014. Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education: Summary report for Summit on Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education. Available at http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/events/files/Future_Undergrad_Geoscience_Summit_report.pdf (accessed 10 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Swarat, S., Light, G., Park, E.J., and Drane, D. 2011. A typology of undergraduate students' conceptions of size and scale: Identifying and characterizing conceptual variation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:512–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teed, R., and Slattery, W. 2011. Changes in geologic time understanding in a class for preservice teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education 59:151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C.A., and Opfer, J. 2010. How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. Child Development 81:1768–1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourniaire, F., and Pulos, S. 1985. Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics 16:181–204.
   Google Scholar
• Trend, R. 1998. An investigation into understanding of geological time among 10- and 11-year-old children. International Journal of Science Education 20:973–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trend, R. 2000. Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees, with reference to their engagement with geoscience, history, and science. International Journal of Science Education 22:539–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trend, R. 2001. Deep time framework: A preliminary study of U.K. primary teachers' conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geoscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38:191–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretter, T., Jones, M.G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., and Minogue, J. 2006 a. Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students' and experts' concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43:282–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretter, T., Jones, M.G., and Minogue, J. 2006 b. Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43:1061–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Global Change Research Project . 2009. Climate literacy: The essential principles of climate science. Available at http://cpo.noaa.gov/OutreachandEducation/ClimateLiteracy.aspx (accessed 10 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D.H., Miller, D.I., and Newcombe, N.S. 2013. Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking: Links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Current Directions in Psychological Science 22:367–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysession M. LaDue N. Budd D.A. Campbell K. Conklin M. Kappel E. Lewis G. Raynolds R. Ridky R.W. Ross R.M. Taber J. Tewksbury B. Tuddenham P. 2012. Developing and applying a set of Earth Science literacy principles. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60: 95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Yezierski, E.J., and Birk, J.P. 2006. Using animations to close the gender gap. Journal of Chemical Education 83:954–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachs, J.M., and Tyversky, B. 2001. Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin 127:3–21.
   Google Scholar