2,918
Views
53
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
LITERATURE REVIEW

Instructional Utility and Learning Efficacy of Common Active Learning Strategies

, , , , &
Pages 604-625 | Received 14 Feb 2017, Accepted 13 Aug 2017, Published online: 31 Jan 2018

REFERENCES

  • Almer, E.D., Jones, K., and Moeckel, C.L. 1998. The impact of one-minute papers on learning in an introductory accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education 13:485–497.
  • Anastasio, D.J., and Latta, D.K. 2000. Land-use debate. Journal of Geoscience Education 48:593.
  • Anderson, D., and Burns, S. 2013. One-minute paper: Student perception of learning gains. College Student Journal 47:219–227.
  • Anderson, K., Peterson, R., Tonkin, A., and Cleary, E. 2008. The assessment of student reasoning in the context of a clinically oriented PBL program. Medical Teacher 30:787–794.
  • Angelo, T.A., and Cross, K.P. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephen, C., Sikes, J., and Snapp, M. 1978. The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Bair, E.S. 2000. Developing analytical and communication skill sin a mock-trial course based on the famous Woburn, Massachusetts case. Journal of Geoscience Education 48:450–454.
  • Barnes, E. 2008. The one minute paper an assessment innovation at third level: A teaching note. Irish Accounting Review 15:1–12.
  • Barrett, R.C., Frew, S.L., Howell, D.G., Karl, H.A., and Rudin, E.B. 2003. Rim Sim: A role playing simulation. USGS Bulletin 2212:1–113.
  • Barrows, H.S. 1986. A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education , 20:481–486.
  • Birnbaum, S. 2004. Overcoming the limitations of an urban setting through field-based Earth systems inquiry. Journal of Geoscience Education 52:407–410.
  • Bloom, B.S., Krathwohl, D.R., and Masia, B.B. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: D. McKay.
  • Bonwell, C.C., and Eison, J.A. 1991. Active learning, creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
  • Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R., Donovan, M.S., and Pellegrino, J.W., eds. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, expanded ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Brewe, E., Traxler, A., de la Garza, J., and Kramer, L.H. 2013. Extending positive CLASS results across multiple instructors and multiple classes of modeling instruction. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research 9:020116.
  • Budd, D.A., van der Hoeven Kraft, K.J., McConnell, D.A., and Vislova, T. 2013. Characterizing teaching in introductory geology courses: Measuring classroom practices. Journal of Geoscience Education 61:461–475.
  • Burkhardt, J., and Turner, P.R. 2001. Student teams and jigsaw techniques in an undergraduate CSE project course. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2:F3d-12.
  • Chang, C.Y. 2001. A problem-solving based computer-assisted tutorial for the Earth Sciences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17:263–274.
  • Chan, Z.C. 2012. Role-playing in the problem-based learning class. Nurse Education in Practice , 12:21–27.
  • Chizmar, J.F., and Ostrosky, A.L. 1998. The one-minute paper: Some empirical findings. Journal of Economic Education 29:3–10.
  • Clark, I.F., and James, P.R. 2004. Using concept maps to plan an introductory structural geology course. Journal of Geoscience Education 52:224–230.
  • Colosi, J.C., and Zales, C.R. 1998. Education jigsaw cooperative learning improves biology lab courses. Biosicence 48:118–124.
  • Cox, R. 1999. Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction 9:343–363.
  • Crouch, C.H., and Mazur, E. 2001. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics 69:970–977.
  • Crouch, C.H., Fagan, A.P., Callan, J.P., and Mazur, E. 2004. Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? American Journal of Physics 72:835–838.
  • Daley, B.J., and Torre, D.M. 2010. Concept maps in medical education: An analytical literature review. Medical Education 44:440–448.
  • Dancy, M., Henderson, C., and Turpen, C. 2016. How faculty learn about and implement research-based instructional strategies: The case of peer instruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research 12:010110.
  • Das, A. 2010. Econometric assessment of “one minute” paper as a pedagogic tool. International Education Studies 3:17–22.
  • Derting, T.L., and Ebert-May, D. 2010. Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: Positive relationships with long-term student achievement. CBE—Life Sciences Education 9:462–472.
  • Dinan, F. 2002. Chemistry by the case. Journal of College Science Teaching 32:36–41.
  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., Vanden Bossche, P., and Gijbels, D. 2003. Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction 13:533–568.
  • Doymus, K. 2008. Teaching chemical equilibrium with the jigsaw technique. Research in Science Education 38:249–260.
  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., and Willingham, D.T. 2013. Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14:4–58.
  • Dunn, A., MacKay, R., and Resor, P. 2016 a. Balancing the radiation budget: A jigsaw exploration of the global climate system. InTeGrate. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/164810 (accessed 23 January 2017).
  • Dunn, A., MacKay, R., and Resor, P. 2016 b. Circulation in the atmosphere—A map and cross section based jigsaw. InTeGrate. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/164807 (accessed 23 January 2017).
  • Eddy, S.L., and Hogan, K.A. 2014. Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education 13:453–468.
  • Edwards, B. 2017. Introduction to global climate change activity. InTeGrate. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/65120 (accessed 21 January 2017).
  • Englebrecht, A.C., Mintzes, J.J., Brown, L.M., and Kelso, P.R. 2005. Probing understanding in physical geology using concept maps and clinical interviews. Journal of Geoscience Education 53:263–270.
  • Fasse, B., and Kolodner, J. 2000. Evaluating classroom practices using qualitative research methods: Defining and refining the process. In Fishman, B., and O'Connor-Divelbiss, S., eds. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 193–198.
  • Fink, L.D. 2003. Creating significant learning experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fitzgerald, D. 2013. Employing think–pair–share in associate degree nursing curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Nursing 8:88–90.
  • Flavell, J.H. 1971. First discussant's comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development 14:272–278.
  • Flavell, J.H. 1973. Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In Resnik, LB., ed., The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Forbes-Lorman, R.M., Harris, M.A., Chang, W.S., Dent, E.W., Nordheim, E.V., and Franzen, M.A. 2016. Physical models have gender-specific effects on student understanding of protein structure–function relationships. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 44:326–335.
  • Francek, M. 2006. Promoting discussion in the science classroom using gallery walks. Journal of College Science Teaching 36:27–31.
  • Francis, P.J., and Byrne, A.P. 1999. Use of role-playing exercises in teaching undergraduate astronomy and physics. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 16:206–211.
  • Frey, S.T., Moomaw, W.R., Halstead, J.A., Robinson, C.W., Marsella, K.A., & Thomas, J.J. 2003. Home energy conservation exercise. Journal of Geoscience Education , 51:521–526.
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., and Wenderoth, M.P. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:8410–8415.
  • Freeman, S., Haak, D., and Wenderoth, M.P. 2011. Increased course structure improves performance in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education 10:175–186.
  • Fuhrman, M. 1996. Developing good multiple-choice tests and test questions, Journal of Geoscience Education 44:379–384.
  • Future of Undergraduate Geoscience Education . 2014. Summary report, 13 p.
  • Gilbert, S.W., and Ireton, S.W. 2003. Understanding models in Earth and space science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Gobert, J. 1997. Summarizing, explaining, and diagramming: The differential effects on text-based representations and mental models. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , Stanford University, August 7–10, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Gobert, J.D., and Clement, J.J. 1999. Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36:39–53.
  • Göçer, A. 2010. A comparative research on the effectivity of cooperative learning method and jigsaw technique on teaching literary genres. Educational Research and Reviews 5:439–445.
  • Goldsmith, D.W. 2011. A case-based curriculum for introductory geology. Journal of Geoscience Education 59:119–125.
  • Gonzalez, H.L., Palencia, A.P., Umana, L.A., Galindo, L., and Villafrade, M.L.A. 2008. Mediated learning experience and concept maps: A pedagogical tool for achieving meaningful learning in medical physiology students. Advances in Physiology Education 32:312–316.
  • Graham, M.J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A.B., and Handelsman, J. 2013. Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science 341:1455–1456.
  • Gray, K., Steer, D., McConnell, D., and Owens, K. 2010. Using a student-manipulated model to enhance student learning in a large lecture class. Journal of College Science Teaching 40:86–95.
  • Gray, K.R., Owens, K.D., Steer, D.N., McConnell, D.A., and Knight, C.C. 2011. An exploratory study using hands-on physical models in a large introductory Earth Science classroom: Student attitudes and lessons learned. Electronic Journal of Science Education 12:1–23.
  • Greer, L., and Heaney, P.J. 2004. Real-time analysis of student comprehension: An assessment of electronic student response technology in an introductory Earth Science course. Journal of Geoscience Education 52:345–351.
  • Grissom, A.N., Czajka, C.D., and McConnell, D.A. 2015. Revisions of physical geology laboratory courses to increase the level of inquiry: Implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Geoscience Education , 63:285–296.
  • Gross, D., Pietri, E.S., Anderson, G., Myano-Camihort, K., and Graham, M.J. 2015. Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education 14:1–8.
  • Haak, D.C., Hille RisLambers, J., Pitre, E., and Freeman, S. 2011. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science 332:1213–1216.
  • Hageman, J.H. 2010. Use of molecular models for active learning in biochemistry lecture courses. Journal of Chemical Education 87:291–293.
  • Hales, T.C., and Cashman, K.V. 2008. Simulating social and political influences on hazard analysis through a classroom role playing exercise. Journal of Geoscience Education 56:54–60.
  • Hanson, D.M. 2006. Instructor's guide to process-oriented guided-inquiry learning. Lisle, IL: Pacific Crest.
  • Harpp, K.S., Koleszar, A.M., and Geist, D.J. 2005. Volcanoes in the classroom: A simulation of an eruption column. Journal of Geoscience Education , 53:173–175.
  • Harpp, K.S., and Sweeney, W.J. 2002. Simulating a volcanic crisis in the classroom. Journal of Geoscience Education 50:410–418.
  • Harris, M.A., Peck, R.F., Colton, S., Morris, J., Chaibub Neto, E., and Kallio, J. 2009. A combination of hand-held models and computer imaging programs helps students answer oral questions about molecular structure and function: A controlled investigation of student learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education 8:29–43.
  • Harwood, W.S. 1996. The one-minute paper: A communication tool for large lecture classes. Journal of Chemical Education 33:229–230.
  • Harwood, W.S., McKinster, J.G., Cruz, L., and Gabel, D. 2002. Acting out science: Using Senate hearings to debate global climate change. Journal of College Science Teaching 31:442–447.
  • Hay, D., Kinchin, I., and Lygo-Baker, S. 2008. Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 33:295–311.
  • Henderson, C., and Dancy, M. 2007. Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research 3:020102–1 -14.
  • Henderson, C., and Dancy, M.H. 2009. Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research 5:020107.
  • Henderson, C., Beach, A., and Finkelstein, N. 2011. Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:952–984.
  • Henderson, C., Dancy, M., and Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. 2012. Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation–decision process? Physical Review Physics Education Research 8:020104.
  • Hernández-Machado, B., and Casillas-Martínez, L. 2009. Design and assessment of an introductory geomicrobiology course for non-geology majors. Journal of Geoscience Education 57:23–32.
  • Herreid, C.F. 1994. Case studies in science—A novel method of science education. Journal of College Science Teaching 23:221–229.
  • Herreid, C.F. 1997–1998. What makes a good case? Journal of College Science Teaching 27:163–165.
  • Herreid, C.F. 2001. Don't! What not to do in teaching cases. Journal of College Science Teaching 30:292–294.
  • Houlton, H.R. 2010. Academic provenance: Investigation of pathways that lead students into the geosciences [M.S. thesis]. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
  • Johnson, J.K., and Reynolds, S.J. 2005. Concept sketches—Using student- and instructor-generated, annotated sketches for learning, teaching, and assessment in geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education 53:85–95.
  • Jones, L.R., Miller, A.G., and Watts, J.F. 2001. Conceptual learning and quantitative problem solving: Friends or foes? Journal of Cooperation and Collaboration in College Teaching 10:109–116.
  • Karpicke, J.D., and Blunt, J.R. 2011. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 331:772–775.
  • Kinchin, I.M., and Hay, D.B. 2005. Using concept maps to optimize the composition of collaborative student groups: A pilot study. Journal of Advanced Nursing 51:182–187.
  • Kinchin, I.M., Hay, D.B., and Adams, A. 2000. How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development. Educational Research 42:43–57.
  • Kober, N. 2015. Reaching students: What research says about effective instruction in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Kolodner, J. 2004. Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 39:1–31.
  • Kolodner, J.L., and Nagel, K. 1999. The design discussion area: A collaborative learning tool in support of learning from problem-solving and design activities. In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. International Society of the Learning Sciences, p. 37.
  • Kortz, K., and Smay, J. 2012. Lecture tutorials. Pedagogy in action: The SERC portal for educators. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/30439 (accessed 29 January 2017).
  • Kortz, K.M., Smay, J., and Murray, D.P. 2008. Increasing student learning in introductory geoscience courses using lecture tutorials. Journal of Geoscience Education 56:280–290.
  • Landis, C.R., Ellis, A.B., Lisensk, G.C., Lorenz, J.K., Meeker, K., and Wamser, C.C. 2001. Chemistry conceptests: A pathway to interactive classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Lev, S.M. 2004. A problem-based learning exercise for environmental geology. Journal of Geoscience Education 52:128–132.
  • Levine, R., Gonzalez, R., Cole, S., Fuhrman, M., and Carlson Le Floch, K. 2007. The geoscience pipeline: A conceptual framework. Journal of Geoscience Education 55:458–468.
  • Libarkin, J.C., and Anderson, S.W. 2005. Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: Results from the Geoscience Concept Inventory. Journal of Geoscience Education 53:394–401.
  • Libarkin, J.C., Ward, E.M.G., Anderson, S.W., Kortemeyer, G., and Raeburn, S.P. 2011. Revisiting the Geoscience Concept Inventory: A call to the community. GSA Today 21:26–28.
  • Lyman, F. 1987. Think–pair–share: An expanding teaching technique. MAA—CIE Cooperative News 1:1–2.
  • Macdonald, R.H., and Korinek, L. 1995. Cooperative-learning activities in large entry-level geology courses. Journal of Geological Education 43:341–345.
  • Macdonald, R.H., Manduca, C.A., Mogk, D.W., and Tewksbury, B.J. 2005. Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge survey of US faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education 53:237–252.
  • MacKay, R. 2017. Teaching with models—SERC pedagogy in action. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/1086.835 (accessed 27 January 2017).
  • Manduca, C., Iverson, E., Tewksbury, B., Luxenburg, M., Macdonald, H., McConnell, D.A., Mogk, D., and Tewksbury, B.J. 2017. Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances 3:e1600193, doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600193 .
  • Mayer, R.E. 2001. Multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mazur, E. 1997. Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • McConnell, D., Steer, D., and Owens, K. 2003. Assessment and active learning strategies for introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education 51:205–216.
  • McConnell, D.A., Steer, D.N., Owens, K.D., Knott, J.R., Van Horn, S., Boroswki, W., Dick, J., Foos, A., Malone, M., McGrew, H., Greer, L., and Heaney, P.J. 2006. Using conceptests to assess and improve student conceptual understanding in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education 54:61–68.
  • McDermott, L.C., and Shaffer, P.S. 1998. Tutorials in introductory physics, preliminary ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • McEwen, L., Stokes, A., Crowley, K., and Roberts, C. 2014. Using role-play for expert science communication with professional stakeholders in flood risk management. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 38:277–300.
  • Meltzer, D.E., and Manivannan, K. 2002. Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture. American Journal of Physics 70:639–654.
  • Miller, P.H., Kessel, F.S., and Flavell, J.H. 1970. Thinking about people thinking about people thinking about…: A study of social–cognitive development. Child Development 41:613–623.
  • Milner-Bolotin, M., Kotlicki, A., and Rieger, G. 2007. Can students learn from lecture demonstrations? Journal of College Science Teaching , 36:45–49.
  • Mintzes, J.J., Canas, A., Coffey, J., Gorman, J., Gurley, L., Hoffman, R., McGuire, S.Y., Miller, N., Moon, B., Trifone, J., and Wandersee, J.H. 2011. Comment on “Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping.” Science 334:453.
  • Mora, G. 2010. Peer instruction and lecture tutorials equally improve student learning in introductory geology classes. Journal of Geoscience Education 58:286–296.
  • Moskowitz, J.M., Malvin, J.H., Schaeffer, G.A., and Schaps, E. 1985. Evaluation of jigsaw, a cooperative learning technique. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10:104–112.
  • Murck, B. 1999. Promoting and evaluating participation in high-enrollment undergraduate courses. Journal of Geoscience Education 47:131.
  • Nesbit, J.C., and Adesope, O.O. 2006. Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 76:413–448.
  • Nielsen, K.L., Hansen, G., and Stav, J.B. 2016. How the initial thinking period affects student argumentation during peer instruction: Students' experiences versus observations. Studies in Higher Education 41:124–138.
  • Novak, J.D. 1990. Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science 19 :29–52.
  • Novak, J.D., and Cañas, A.J. 2008. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them.IHMC CmapTools, Technical Report 2006-01 Rev 2008-01, p. 1–36.
  • Novak, J.D., and Gowin, D.B. 1984. Learning how to learn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Orr, J.C. 2005. Instant assessment: Using one-minute papers in lower-level classes. Pedagogy 5:108–111.
  • Palmer, J., and Johnson, J.T. 1989. Jigsaw in a college classroom: Effects on student achievement and impact on student evaluations of teacher performance. Journal of Social Studies Research 13:34–37.
  • Perkins, D.V., and Saris, R.N. 2001. A jigsaw classroom technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology 28:111–113.
  • Pollock, S.J., and Finkelstein, N.D. 2008. Sustaining educational reforms in introductory physics. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research , 4:010110.
  • Prather, E.E., Slater, T.F., Adams, J.P., Bailey, J.M., Jones, L.V., and Dostal, J.A. 2004. Research on a lecture-tutorial approach to teaching introductory astronomy to nonscience majors. Astronomy Education Review 3:122–136.
  • Quinn, H.J., Mintzes, J.J., and Laws, R.A. 2003. Successive concept mapping. Journal of College Science Teaching 33:12–16.
  • Rao, S.P., and DiCarlo, S.E. 2000. Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. Advances in Physiology Education 24:51–55.
  • Reynolds, S.J., and Peacock, S.M. 1998. Slide observations–Promoting active learning, landscape appreciation, and critical thinking in introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education , 46:421–426.
  • Riggs, E.M., Lieder, C.C., and Balliet, R. 2009. Geologic problem solving in the field: Analysis of field navigation and mapping by advanced undergraduates. Journal of Geoscience Education 57:48–63.
  • Ruiz-Primo, M.A., and Shavelson, R.J. 1996. Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33:569–600.
  • Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Schultz, S.E., Li: M., and Shavelson, R.J. 2001. Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38:260–278.
  • Russell, J., Van Horne, S., Ward, A.S., Bettis, E.A., Sipola, M., Colombo, M., and Rochford, M.K. 2016. Large lecture transformation: Adopting evidence-based practices to increase student engagement and performance in an introductory science course. Journal of Geoscience Education 64 (1):37–51.
  • Russell, S.H., Hancock, M.P., and McCullough, J. 2007. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science 316:548–549.
  • Sawada, D., Piburn, M.D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., and Bloom, I. 2002. Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics , 102:245–253.
  • Sawyer, D.S., Henning, A.T., Shipp, S., and Dunbar, R.W. 2005. A data rich exercise for discovering plate boundary processes. Journal of Geoscience Education 53:65–74.
  • Schraw, G. 1998. Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science 26:113–125.
  • Schwartz, D.L. 1993. The construction and analogical transfer of symbolic visualizations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30:1309–1325.
  • Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. 1997. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Sharma, M.D., Johnston, I.D., Johnston, H., Varvell, K., Robertson, G., Hopkins, A., Stewart, C., Cooper, I., and Thornton, R., 2010. Use of interactive lecture demonstrations: A ten year study. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research , 6:020119.
  • Shellito, L., Walker, B., and Fadem, C. 2016. Climate of change. InTeGrate. Available at http://serc.carleton.edu/86299 (accessed 22 January 2017).
  • Singer, S.R., Nielsen, N.R., and Schweingruber, H.A., eds. 2012. Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B., Adams, W.K., Wieman, C., Knight, J.K., Guild, N., and Su, T.T. 2009. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 323:122–124.
  • Smith, M.K., Wood, W.B., Krauter, K., and Knight, J.K. 2011. Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE—Life Sciences Education 10:55–63.
  • Sokoloff, D.R., and Thornton, R.K. 1997. Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. The Physics Teacher , 35:340–347.
  • Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., and Donovan, S.S. 1999. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 69:21–51.
  • St. John, K., and McNeal, K.S. 2017. The strength of evidence pyramid: One approach for characterizing the strength of evidence of geoscience education research (GER) community claims. Journal of Geoscience Education , 65 (4):363–372.
  • Stead, D.R. 2005. A review of the one-minute paper. Active Learning in Higher Education , 6:118–131.
  • Swope, R.J., and Gieré, R. 2004. A strategy for teaching an effective undergraduate mineralogy course. Journal of Geoscience Education , 52:15–22.
  • Teasdale, R., Viskupic, K., Bartley, J.K., McConnell, D.A., Manduca, C., Bruckner, M., Farthing, D., and Iverson, E. 2017. A multidimensional assessment of reformed teaching practice in geoscience classrooms. Geosphere 13:260–268.
  • Tewksbury, B.J. 1995. Specific strategies for using the “jigsaw” technique for working in groups in non-lecture-based courses. Journal of Geological Education 43:322–326.
  • Torre, D.M., Daley, B.J., Stark-Schweitzer, T., Siddartha, S., Petkova, J., and Ziebert, M. 2007. A qualitative evaluation of medical student learning with concept maps. Medical Teacher 29:949–955.
  • Turpen, C., and Finkelstein, N.D. 2009. Not all interactive engagement is the same: Variations in physics professors' implementations of peer instruction. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research 5:020101.
  • Vickrey, T., Rosploch, K., Rahmanian, R., Pilarz, M., and Stains, M. 2015. Research-based implementation of peer instruction: A literature review. CBE—Life Sciences Education 14:1–11.
  • Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Walker, A., and Leary, H. 2009. A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 3:6–28.
  • Wallace, C.S., Prather, E.E., and Duncan, D.K. 2012. A study of general education astronomy students' understandings of cosmology. Part V. The effects of a new suite of cosmology lecture-tutorials on students' conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science Education 34:1297–1314.
  • Waterman, M.A. 1998. Investigative case study approach for biology learning. Bioscene 24:3–10.
  • Weaver, R.L., and Cortell, H.W. 1985. Mental aerobics: The half-sheet response. Innovative Higher Education 10:23–31.
  • Wilson, C.E. 2013. Graduates' decision points for majoring in the geosciences. American Geosciences Institute, Geoscience Currents No. 78. Available at http://www.agiweb.org/workforce/Currents/Currents-78-DecisionPoints2013b.pdf (accessed 9 October 2016).
  • Wilson, R.C. 1986. Improving faculty teaching: Effective use of the student evaluations and consultants. Journal of Higher Education 57:196–211.
  • Yammine, K., and Violato, C. 2015. The effectiveness of physical models in teaching anatomy: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Advances in Health Science Education 2:883–895.
  • Yin, Y., Vanides, J., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., Ayala, C.C., and Shavelson, R.J. 2005. Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: Implications for scoring, interpretation and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42:166–184.
  • Yuretich, R.F., Khan, S.A., Leckie, R.M., and Clement, J.J. 2001. Active-learning methods to improve student performance and scientific interest in a large introductory oceanography course. Journal of Geoscience Education , 49:111–119.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.